Abstract
BRAF mutations have been found in gliomas which exhibit abnormal electrophysiological activities, implying their potential links with the ion channel functions. In this study, we identified the Drosophila potassium channel, Slowpoke (Slo), the ortholog of human KCNMA1, as a critical factor involved in dRafGOF glioma progression. Slo was upregulated in dRafGOF glioma. Knockdown of slo led to decreases in dRafGOF levels, glioma cell proliferation, and tumor-related phenotypes. Overexpression of slo in glial cells elevated dRaf expression and promoted cell proliferation. Similar mutual regulations of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels were then recapitulated in human glioma cells with the BRAF mutation. Elevated p-BRAF and KCNMA1 were also observed in HEK293T cells upon the treatment of 20 mM KCl, which causes membrane depolarization. Knockdown KCNMA1 in these cells led to a further decrease in cell viability. Based on these results, we conclude that the levels of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 are co-dependent and mutually regulated. We propose that, in depolarized glioma cells with BRAF mutations, high KCNMA1 levels act to repolarize membrane potential and facilitate cell growth. Our study provides a new strategy to antagonize the progression of gliomas as induced by BRAF mutations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase in the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway. It plays an important role in cell proliferation and differentiation [1, 2]. Abnormalities in the proto-oncogene BRAF have been found in various tumors [2,3,4,5]. BRAFV600E, the typical oncogenic mutation, accounts for about 90% of BRAF mutation tumors [6, 7]. In the central nervous system, BRAF mutations are usually found in gliomas, such as the pilocytic astrocytomas, diffuse midline gliomas, and in high grade astrocytomas with piloid features [8]. In children, pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) also exhibit high rates of BRAF alteration. BRAFV600E, for example, was found in about 10–20% of all pLGGs [9,10,11,12,13]. Patients with BRAFV600E usually exhibited worse outcomes than those with non-mutated BRAF pLGG [13]. Mechanistically, BRAF gain-of-function mutations [14, 15], or the activation of the MAPK pathway [16,17,18], clearly altered the electrophysiological properties of neurons. Brain slices carrying the BRAFV600E mutation showed significant increases of focally spontaneous firing rates, suggesting a relationship between BRAFV600E mutation and seizures [19]. When presented in astrocytes, BRAFV600E also led to hyper-excitable intrinsic properties such as threefold increases in action potential firing rates, low thresholds for the firing of action potentials, depolarized membrane potentials, and elevated hyperpolarization-activated inward currents [20]. Though ion-channel dysfunction was strongly implicated in such observations, how ion channels specifically function in BRAF glioma progression currently remained unclear.
KCNMA1 encodes a pore-forming α-subunit of the large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel [21]. KCNMA1 mediates the out-flow of K+ and is regulated by membrane depolarization and intracellular levels of Ca2+ [22, 23]. It plays multi-effect roles in many physiological processes, including membrane potential repolarization [24] and in the control of nerve excitability and neurotransmitter release [25]. Accumulating evidence suggests that K+ channels may be involved in tumorigenesis in a variety of tissues [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Differential expression levels of KCNMA1 in different cancer cells may reflect multiple-related functions in tumor growth. slowpoke (slo) is the ortholog of human KCNMA1 in Drosophila [32,33,34]. It is widely expressed throughout excitable tissues where it affects action potential shape, neural excitability, transmitter release, and smooth muscle tone [35]. Studies of slo mutants have revealed the corresponding roles of K+ channels in neuronal functions, circadian activity [34, 36].
The Drosophila larval brain is a unique system for genetic screening identifying factors that inhibit tumor growth. Drosophila Raf (dRaf) is the only ortholog of human BRAF. Overexpression of a truncated form of dRaf (dRafGOF) in glial cells of the larval brains led to glioma phenotypes such as enlarged brain sizes, over-proliferation of glial cells, seizure-like behavior in adult animals, and shortened lifespans [37, 38].
In this study, we employed a Drosophila RafGOF glioma model and identified that Slo was required for tumor progression. dRafGOF and Slo expression levels were revealed as co-dependent and mutually regulated in glioma brains. This co-dependency was recapitulated in human cells where elevated KCNMA1 was observed in gliomas with BRAFGOF mutation. In such case knockdown of KCNMA1 reduced p-BRAF levels and inhibited cell growth. Our data suggests that this co-dependent regulation of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels is mediated by a membrane potential-sensitive mechanism. Our study may lead to KCNMA1 becoming highlighted as a potential drug target that could be functionally-specific for tumors induced by BRAF mutations.
Materials and methods
Fly stocks and genetics
All flies were kept at 25 °C with standard cornmeal/yeast/agar medium. Late 3rd instar larvae were collected for studies unless otherwise stated. Sources of Drosophila stocks in this study are listed below: w1118 (THJ025, Tsinghua Drosophila center), repo-GAL4, UAS-eGFP/CyO; UAS-RafGOF/TM6B GAL80 (gifts from Xi Huang’s lab), slo RNAi (THU2519.N and THU2246, Tsinghua Drosophila center), sloKO (Generated in this study), slo gRNA (79777, Bloomington), nos-GAL4, UAS-Cas9 (67083, Bloomington), UAS-slo (Generated in this study).
Fly seizure-like behavior test
Analysis of seizure phenotype induced by heat-shock was performed in transparent tubes with 20 flies in each tube. Flies were heat shocked at 37 °C for the given time up to 10 min. Within 10 min after treatment, each occasion a fly dropped from the tube wall and lay upside-down at the bottom was counted as one seizure-like event.
Samples from patients
Five samples were obtained following informed consent from patients. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Research Ethics Board at the Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The permit to use the clinical data was approved by the institutional review boards.
Cell culture
DBTRG-05MG was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). T98G and U87-MG (from ATCC), were the gifts from Dr. Du Linyong. The HEK293T cell line (from ATCC) was a gift from Dr. Liang Hongqing. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM (GIBCO) at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2 with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Scientific, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin). All lines were routinely checked for STR identification and mycoplasma contamination.
Lentivirus production and infection
Lentiviral particles were generated by transfecting HEK293T cells with pLKO.1 -shRNA-copGFP-2A-PURO, pSAX2 and pVSVG at a ratio of 3:4:1. shRNAs in pLKO.1 were constructed commercially by the Tsingke company. The sequences of shRNA were as follows: NC-shRNA 5ʹ-CGTGACACGTTCGGAGAACC-3ʹ, KCNMA1-shRNA1 5ʹ -TTAACTCTATGATTTCAGGG-3ʹ, KCNMA1-shRNA2 5ʹ-TCTTTCCAATTCCAGCTCGG-3ʹ. Transfection was performed using Lipo8000™ Transfection Reagent (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Virus-containing supernatant was collected and filtered (0.45 µm) at 48 h and 72 h after transfection. The viral supernatant was then used to transfect cells in the presence of polybrene (8 µg/ml) for 24 h and selected with puromycin (4 µg/ml) for 72 h.
Antibody generation
Slo cDNA encoding aa 636 to 816 was cloned into a pGEX-4T-1 expression vector. The antigen was bacterially produced, and the antibody raised in rabbits according to the published protocol [39].
The same method was used to make the dRaf antigen (aa 285–421). Anti-dRaf was generated in guinea pigs.
Antibodies used in this study
The commercial primary antibodies in this paper were as follows: anti-REPO (8D12, DSHB); anti-pH3 (Ser10) (H0412, Millipore); anti-Cleaved-Caspase 3 (9664, Cell Signaling); anti-α tubulin (ab18251, abcam); anti-MEK (8727, Cell Signaling); anti-p-MEK (Ser217/221) (3958, Cell Signaling); anti-ERK (sc-514302, Santa Cruz); anti-p-ERK (T202/Y264) (4370, Cell Signaling); anti-KCNMA1 (sc-374142, Santa Cruz); anti-Ki-67 (9129, Cell Signaling); and anti-GAPDH (ab8245, abcam).
Three BRAF-related antibodies were used in this study: anti-BRAF (sc-5284, Santa Cruz) were used to detect the total levels of BRAF; anti-BRAFV600E specifically recognizing mutated amino acid sequence (ab228461, abcam) were used to detect the levels of BRAFV600E; anti-p-BRAF (S729) specifically recognizing phosphorylated site (ab124794, abcam) were used to detect the levels of BRAF with serine 729 phosphorylation, to measure the BRAF activation levels regardless of the presence of BRAF mutations.
Immunofluorescence staining
For brain immunostaining, late 3rd instar larval brains were dissected in ice-cold PBS (10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, 175 mM NaCl, pH7.4) and fixed for 15 min in PBS with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. For cell immunostaining, cells on slides were fixed for 15 min in PBS with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. All samples were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by washes and mixture of the secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h [39, 40]. All commercial secondary antibodies used were from the Jackson Laboratory. DNA was stained with DAPI (C1002, Beyotime) at 1:2000. Antifade Mounting Medium (P0126, Beyotime) was used to protect the fluorescent signals. Images were obtained using an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope and processed with Adobe Photoshop.
Quantification of mitotic glial cells
All samples were immunofluorescent stained with primary antibody (anti-Repo, anti-PH3), and appropriate secondary antibodies. The proliferating glial cells were double-labelled by anti-Repo and anti-PH3. Mitotic glial cells were quantified by counting the total numbers of proliferating glial cells in a hemispheric lobe.
Western blot
Late 3rd instar larval brains or cultured cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% IGEPAL CA‐630 and complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)]. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore #IPVH0001). Western blot assays were performed according to the published protocol [39]. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using Clinx ChemiScope.
Immunohistochemistry of tissue sections
Anti-KCNMA1 was used to stain the paraffin embedded sample sections performed by the Core Facilities, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine. Images were taken using a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i microscope.
Quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was extracted using the TRIzol (Invitrogen) method. A cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme) was then used according to the manufacturer's protocol. A 7900HT fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) was used for quantitative RT-PCR. PCR was carried out using a Power SYBR Green PCR Mix Kit (Vazyme) in 96-well plates following published methods [39]. rp49 was used as an internal control for Drosophila brain samples and GAPDH for human samples. The primer for RT-PCR in this study: for slo, forward 5ʹ-GCCCATGATAACAGAACTGG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-GTAAGTCGTGGACATCAGC-3ʹ; for Raf, forward 5ʹ-GAGGAAAACTGGAATATTCTGGCG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-CTCGGTGTCTTCACGTTGAGTGTC-3ʹ; for rp49, forward 5ʹ-GCTAAGCTGTCGCACAAA-3ʹ, reverse 5’-TCCGGTGGGCAGCATGTG-3ʹ; for BRAF, forward 5ʹ-TACCTGGCTCACTAACTAACGTG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-CACATGTCGTGTTTTCCTGAG-3ʹ; for KCNMA1, forward 5ʹ-GGCAGCAGTCTTAGAATGAGTAG-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-AAAGCCCACCACATGCGTT-3ʹ; for GAPDH, forward 5ʹ-CTCCTGCACCACCAACTGCT-3ʹ, reverse 5ʹ-GGGCCATCCACAGTCTTCTG-3ʹ.
Assessment of cell proliferation by CCK8
Cells were seeded (5000/well) and maintained in 96-well plates. For the determination of cell proliferation, a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8; Glpbio.GK10001) was used according to the user’s manual. Fluorescence (450 nm) was recorded on a microplate reader (Biotek Synergy H1).
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. All statistical data are processed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test in GraphPad Prism.
Results
Slo knockdown inhibits Drosophila Raf GOF glioma symptoms
To explore the potential roles of ion channels in tumor growth, we employed a Drosophila glioma model induced by constitutively activated Raf (dRafGOF) in the glial cells of larval brains. This model mimicked gliomas in patients with aberrant activations of BRAF [38, 41], with enlarged brain lobe sizes as marked by eGFP driven by the glial specific repo-GAL4 (Fig. 1b). We performed knockdown screens of ion channel genes with RNAi lines available, and quantified the brain lobe diameters of the 3rd instar larvae as the primary parameter to evaluate the functions of ion channels on tumor growth. The Drosophila line with repo-GAL4, UAS-eGFP only was used as control in this study. Ameliorative phenotypes were observed for dRafGOF glioma brains with slo knockdown (Fig. 1a, b). Two independent slo-RNAi lines targeting non-overlapping regions of slo transcript (RNAi1, THU2519.N and RNAi2, THU2246 from Tsinghua Drosophila Center) were crossed into the dRafGOF glioma background, respectively. Glial cell-specific knockdown of slo in dRafGOF gliomas completely prevented brain sizes (Fig. 1a–c).
To eliminate the possibility of off-target effects in RNAi experiments, a slo genetic mutation was generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 method. The mutant harbored a frame shift mutation with a 2 bp deletion in codon 85, resulting in a truncated protein (Fig. S1a and S1b). We named this slo mutation as sloKO. Homozygous sloKO mutant flies were viable and produced progeny, albeit with a weak locomotion defects as reported earlier [42, 43]. When the homozygous sloKO was introduced into the dRafGOF background, the brain lobe sizes of the 3rd instar larvae were significant smaller than those without such a sloKO introduction. This was consistent with the results from RNAi experiments (Fig. S1c, Fig. 1c). This observation confirms that the slo RNAi rescue phenotype is not an off-target event. Interestingly, neither knocking down slo in glial cells of wt brains nor the homozygous sloKO animals resulted in any discernible effects on their brain sizes or total numbers of mitotic glial cells as compared with wt brains (Fig. S2a–S2c). The viabilities of slo RNAi groups were not significantly altered, neither (Fig. S2d). These findings suggest that, although Slo plays a very prominent role in dRafGOF-induced glioma growth, its functions are largely dispensable for normal glial cell proliferation.
Recent studies have shown that the low-grade gliomas with BRAF mutations have been frequently accompanied by epileptic seizures [19, 44, 45]. Similar spontaneous epileptic phenotype was detected and adult animals lying upside-down were observed in dRafGOF glioma flies (Fig. 1d). A quick and well-established method to induce the seizure-like behavior in adult flies is to heat-shock the animals at 37 °C [46,47,48,49]. However, the dRafGOF glioma flies exhibited seizures at a greatly reduced heat shock time as compared to control flies. Four and half minute heat-shock began inducing weak but reproducible seizure-like activities in dRafGOF glioma flies (Fig. 1e), and the phenotype continued to be greatly enhanced from this point on. No wt flies showed any corresponding seizures (Fig. 1e). Such seizures were largely avoided by slo RNAi treatments (Fig. 1e). We also performed Kaplan–Meier survival curve analyses. Since male flies showed more pronounced survival rate changes, only male flies were used in this study. Results showed a significantly shorter median survival for dRafGOF glioma group (17 days, P < 0.0001) as compared with the control group (64 days); while dRafGOF glioma with slo RNAi groups showing extended median survival to 67 days and 58.5 days, respectively (Fig. 1f).
Elevated Slo expression promotes dRaf GOF glioma cell proliferation
slo encodes a pore-forming K+ channel protein involved in electrophysiological processes. An antibody against the fragment of Slo from aa 636 to 816 was generated in rabbits and exhibited antigen specificity against Slo protein. Anti-Slo immunofluorescence staining showed punctate signals in glial cells of Drosophila 3rd instar larval brains (arrowheads, Fig. 2a), which was consistent with previous reports [50, 51]. In order to verify Slo membrane locations, we stained cells in the larval salivary glands where the Slo punctate signals were associated with cell membranes (Fig. 2b). The Slo signals were notably denser in dRafGOF gliomas, suggesting a higher Slo protein levels in tumor cells. Upon slo knockdown, punctate Slo signals were decreased significantly (arrowheads, Fig. 2a). The Western blot results clearly showed that the expression of Slo in dRafGOF glioma brains was significantly higher than that in the controls (Fig. 2c), while slo knockdown resulted in a reduction of Slo expression. These results were consistent with the immunofluorescence staining data (Fig. 2a).
The superficial layer of the larval brain lobes mainly contains three glial cell types: namely perineural, sub-perineural and cortex glial cells. Perineural, sub-perineural glial cells collectively function as the brain blood barrier (BBB, Fig. 2d) [52, 53]. Since the BBB is an easily accessible structure in Drosophila larval brains, we examined the glial cells in the BBB. In Confocal cross section images, notably thickened glial cell layers were observed in dRafGOF glioma brains as compared with those of the wt (between two arrows, Fig. 2d, e). When slo expression was knocked down with RNAi, the thickness of glial cell layers was then restored (Fig. 2e). We assumed that the discrepancy of glial layer thickness among different samples was due to the hyper-proliferation of glioma cells [54,55,56]. Therefore, a mitosis marker, anti-PH3, was used to visualize proliferating cells. Indeed, the total numbers of proliferating glial cells double-labeled by anti-PH3 and anti-Repo were almost doubled in dRafGOF glioma brains as compared with wt (Fig. 2e, f). However, knockdown of slo resulted in decreased numbers of these mitotic glial cells. These experiments were repeated with the sloKO line and similar results were obtained (Fig. S3, Fig. 2e–g).
To exclude the possibility that apoptosis may contribute to the decrease in total glial cell populations in the slo RNAi experiments, we stained the brains with anti-Cleaved Caspase3 to evaluate the potential apoptosis in slo knockdown dRafGOF glioma brains. No apoptotic signal was detected in the control or glioma brains, or in the glioma brains with slo knockdown (Fig. S4), suggesting that the inhibition of glioma progression by slo knockdown was independent of apoptosis. Based on these data, we conclude that the elevated levels of Slo in glial cells promotes tumor progression in dRafGOF glioma brains.
Expression of Slo and dRafGOFare co-dependent and mutually regulated
It is known that oncogenic BRAF mutations activate downstream MEK (MEK1 and MEK2) and ERK (ERK1 and ERK2) kinases in the BRAF/MAPK pathway (Fig. 3a) [1, 2]. To further probe the relationship between Slo and the BRAF/MAPK pathway, the expression levels of these proteins were examined. Western blot results showed that the total protein levels of both MEK and ERK remained unchanged, while levels of phosphorylated MEK (p-MEK) and phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) were upregulated significantly in dRafGOF gliomas (Fig. 3b). This suggested that the BRAF/MAPK pathway was hyper-active. However, upon slo-RNAi treatments the activity of the BRAF/MAPK pathway was suppressed, as manifested by the reduced levels of p-MEK and p-ERK (Fig. 3b). This experiment was repeated with the sloKO line and similar results were observed (Fig. 3c). This demonstrates that elevated Slo expression is required for BRAF/MAPK pathway activation in dRafGOF gliomas and that the knockdown of slo reduces p-MEK and p-ERK levels.
We then set to explore the relationship between Slo and dRaf expressions. An antibody against the fragment of dRaf from aa 331 to 466 was generated in Guinea pigs (Fig. 3d). The dRafGOF protein contained a truncated sequence with a smaller molecular weight of 39 kDa as compared with the full length dRaf of 88 kDa (Fig. 3d) [57]. Our immunofluorescent staining results showed that the strong dRaf signal co-localized with glial specific GFP in the cytoplasm of dRafGOF glioma cells (Fig. 3e). Western blot data confirmed that dRafGOF was highly expressed in glioma brains, while the expression levels of the full length wt dRaf was low (Fig. 3f). Furthermore, insufficiency of slo was accompanied by the downregulation of dRafGOF levels (Fig. 3f, g), while the levels of full length dRaf (88 kDa) remained unchanged (Fig. 3f, g). It seemed that only truncated dRafGOF levels had fallen upon slo knockdown. Since the expression of dRafGOF was driven by repo-GAL4 and the total mRNA levels of dRaf showed no significant changes (Fig. 3h), the downregulation of the dRafGOF was likely due to its degradation. This leaves it unclear as to why the full length dRaf levels remain unchanged. One possibility is that the full length dRaf is more stable than the truncated form.
We further asked whether overexpression of slo would upregulate dRaf expression in the wt brain, leading to tumor-like phenotypes. A Drosophila line with slo overexpression driven by repo-Gal4 in wt background was used in our study. Raised expression levels of Slo were confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot (Fig. S5a, S5b). Slo overexpression resulted in not only larger brain sizes but also increased numbers of proliferating glial cells as compared with controls (Fig. S5c–S5e). Remarkably, dRaf expression was also upregulated, without any significant changes in RNA levels (Fig. S5a, S5b). As expected, the p-MEK levels were also elevated, suggesting that over-expression of Slo promoted the glial cell proliferation via the BRAF/MAPK pathway. More importantly, it showed that elevated Slo alone was able to upregulate dRaf levels, which in turn gave rise to tumor like phenotypes. In summary, Slo protein level is elevated in dRafGOF glioma cells. Knockdown of slo not only downregulates dRafGOF expression but also ameliorates tumor phenotypes. Overexpression of Slo elevates dRaf expression in wt glial cells. Thus, expressions of Slo and dRafGOF are co-dependent and mutually regulated.
KCNMA1 expression is elevated in human glioma with BRAF V600E mutation
Having established that Slo functions on dRafGOF glioma progression in Drosophila larval brains, it is important to move on to consider if the same mechanism is represented in human patients. Since human BRAF mutations have been often detected in children, five glioma samples, classified as WHO grade I–V types, were collected from pediatric patients. Clinical data of these samples were obtained from the medical records (Table 1). We first estimated the expression of human ortholog of slo, KCNMA1, using a commercial anti-KCNMA1 antibody. The sample P1, which was diagnosed as a hair cell astrocytoma and classified as a WHO grade I glioma, exhibited high levels of KCNMA1 expression while signals from the other four samples were either low or undetected (Fig. 4a).
To validate the raised expression of KCNMA1 in this sample, Western Blot analysis was performed. As expected, the expression of KCNMA1 was highest in sample P1 (Fig. 4b), which was consistent with the immunochemical results. Remarkably, DNA sequencing data showed that the sample P1 carried the BRAFV600E, a well-studied and constitutively active form of BRAF mutation. No BRAF mutations were identified in any of the other four samples (Table 1). We then examined the status of BRAF/MAPK pathway. The extremely high level of p-MEK was reflected the hyper-activated status of the BRAF/MAPK pathway in sample P1 (Fig. 4b). These observations followed our findings in Drosophila that constitutively activated BRAFV600E promoting the ion channel KCNMA1 expression in glioma cells.
Lack of KCNMA1 suppresses the proliferation and MAPK pathway in BRAF V600E glioma cells
To study KCNMA1 function required for human glioma progression, the glioblastoma cell line DBTRG-05MG, a heterozygous mutant carrying BRAFV600E, was employed in our study together with other two glioblastoma cell lines (U87-MG and T98G) with wt BRAF as controls. U87-MG carries mutations in NF1 and PTEN, while T98G carries the mutations in PTEN and TP53 (cellosaurus.org). The phosphorylation at serine 729 (S729) of BRAF (p-BRAF) was used as a marker of activated BRAF [58, 59]. Western Blot with a specific anti-p-BRAF showed that the level of p-BRAF was significantly higher in DBTRG-05MG cells than that in two control glioma cell lines (Fig. 5a). It was most likely that the protein configuration of the BRAFV600E mutation facilitated BRAF phosphorylation [60]. DBTRG-05MG also showed very high levels of p-MEK and p-ERK, indicating the hyperactive status of BRAF/MAPK pathway (Fig. 5a). Importantly, as judged by the Western blot and immunofluorescence staining, only the DBTRG-05MG cell line showed elevated KCNMA1 expression (Fig. 5a, b). KCNMA1 in mammalian cell lines was also membrane-bound, correlating to what had been previously observed in Drosophila (Fig. 5b).
To investigate the potential roles of KCNMA1 in the glioma cell line with BRAFV600E mutation, two shRNA targeting non-overlapping regions of KCNMA1 transcript were individually cloned into lentivirus derived vectors and introduced into the DBTRG-05MG cell line. The knockdown efficiency of these two shRNAs was confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot (Fig. 5c, g). Ki67, a well-known proliferation marker was employed in this study. These two shRNAs showed impeded KCNMA1 expression and significantly reduced glioma cell proliferation in the DBTRG-05MG cell line as compared with the controls (Fig. 5d–f).
In order to uncover the relationship between BRAF/MAPK activation and elevated KCNMA1 expression, we examined BRAF/MAPK components using Western Blot analyses in the DBTRG-05MG cell line. Notably in the presence of RNAi-mediated knockdown of KCNMA1, marked reductions of BRAFV600E and p-BRAF were observed (Fig. 5g), as well as significant decreases of p-MEK and p-ERK, while total MEK and ERK remained unchanged. These results indicate that a sufficient quantity of KCNMA1 is required to maintain BRAFV600E and p-BRAF levels (Fig. 5g). This is reminiscent of the Slo function in Drosophila RafGOF glioma cells. Taken together, our data indicates that KCNMA1 expression is upregulated in human BRAFV600E glioma cells. Knockdown of KCNMA1 leads to lower levels of p-BRAF (p-BRAFV600E included), resulting in both down-regulation of cell proliferation and suppression of the BRAF/MAPK pathway. The co-dependency and mutual regulation of KCNMA1 and p-BRAF levels seems to be therefore confirmed for BRAFV600E glioma cells in a human context.
Mutual regulation of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels requires channel functions
To understand the mechanism of the mutual regulation of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels, we addressed the question whether the KCNMA1 K+ channel function was involved in this process. KCNMA1 encodes the pore-forming alpha subunit of the MaxiK channels that mediate the export of K+. Such channels are activated by membrane depolarization and an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ [22, 23]. Cromolyn sodium, an FDA-approved anti-allergy drug involving in calcium ion transport [61, 62], was predicted as a potential inhibitor for KCNMA1[63]. Correspondingly, we observed decreased cell viability in DBTRG-05MG cells upon cromolyn treatment (Fig. 6a), and unambiguous reductions of p-BRAF, BRAFV600E and p-MEK were detected in the presence of cromolyn inhibition (Fig. 6b). It is interesting to note that blockage of K+ channel activity also leads to lower levels of KCNMA1, which could be due to decreased levels of p-BRAF. The result from cromolyn treatment demonstrates the co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels and confirms that the K+ channel function is involved in this process.
In the glioma cell line, p-BRAF activated downstream signaling pathways accompanied by higher KCNMA1 expression (Fig. 5a). However, it remained unclear if the increased KCNMA1 expression depended on the activation of the entire pathway. Therefore, we employed Dabrafenib [64], a selective inhibitor blocking MEK phosphorylation by mutated forms of BRAF kinase in our study. Cell growth assays showed that Dabrafenib significantly suppressed the proliferation of DBTRG-05MG cells (Fig. 6c). Under this condition, the high levels of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 remained unchanged and no p-MEK signal was undetected (Fig. 6d). Thus, we concluded that the mutual regulations of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 were not dependent on p-MEK.
p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels are linked to membrane depolarization
We then wanted to know whether any co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels also occurs in cells with wt BRAF. In the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293T (wt BRAF), basal levels of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 were detectable (Fig. 7a). p-BRAF was then noted as clearly downregulated upon KCNMA1 knockdown, while the total expressions of BRAF remained unchanged (Fig. 7a) Concurrent p-MEK decreases were also observed, confirming decreased p-BRAF activity (Fig. 7a). We also raised KCNMA1 expression to see whether p-BRAF levels would follow. Indeed, the overexpression of KCNMA1 also resulted in elevated levels of p-BRAF, BRAF expression, and a corresponding increase in cell proliferation (Fig. 7b, c). These observations confirmed the co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels in HEK293T cells.
It has been reported that the addition of KCl in cell culture medium depolarizes the membrane potential and activates the BRAF/MAPK pathway [65, 66]. HEK293T cells were therefore treated with 20 mM KCl to induce membrane depolarization. As expected, p-BRAF levels were upregulated (Fig. 7d) and, interestingly, the KCNMA1 protein levels were also increased (Fig. 7d). We note that the depolarization of membrane also activates KCNMA1 K+ channels [22, 23]. We then wanted to know whether the KCNMA1 was required for the activation of BRAF/MAPK pathway by depolarization. Knockdown of KCNMA1 in the presence of 20 mM KCl failed to elevate p-BRAF or p-MEK (Fig. 7d). This result suggests that the KCNMA1 channel is necessary for the activation of the BRAF/MAPK pathway upon membrane depolarization induced by KCl.
We further explored the physiological significance of the co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 regulation in HEK293T cells. The cultured cells were treated with 20 mM KCl, with untreated cells as control. Cell growth was then monitored. In the presence of KCl alone, the proliferation of HEK293T cells was almost unaffected, while with additional knockdown of KCNMA1, cell proliferation was dramatically suppressed (Fig. 7e). These results uncover the robust nature of the codependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels and suggest that both are regulated by membrane potential changes. In summary, p-BRAF levels show strong positive correlation with depolarization status. It is KCNMA1, as a K+ channel, that functions to provide compensatory repolarization of the membrane which is required to maintain optimal cell growth conditions.
Discussion
In this study, we have focused on the dependency between glioma growth and ion channel function. The Drosophila RafGOF tumor model mimics gliomas that carries BRAF mutations [38] and show corresponding phenotypes such as glial cell over-proliferation, seizure-like behavior, and shortened life span. Using the Drosophila RafGOF glioma model, together with patient samples and cell lines, we have uncovered the mechanisms of how K+ channels slo/KCNMA1 and p-BRAF strongly enhance glioma growth.
KCNMA1 has been noted as highly expressed in glioblastomas (high grade gliomas). Inconsistent conclusions have been drawn linking the KCNMA1 levels with glioblastoma malignancy [67,68,69]. Such inconsistencies could be due to the different genetic backgrounds of these gliomas. Based on our investigation, we have concluded that KCNMA1 expression is not simply biased toward high grade gliomas, but is linked more specifically to the BRAF mutations that enhance tumor proliferation. It would be interesting to look at more samples from patients in future study to strengthen this observation.
The trans-membrane protein Slo exhibits a low expression in the wt Drosophila brain. We have shown that dRafGOF promotes Slo expression and that the knockdown of slo brings down dRafGOF in dRafGOF gliomas. In addition, the overexpression of Slo in wt background also leads to an elevated dRaf level, resulting in BRAF/MAPK pathway activation. The glioblastoma cell line DBTRG-05MG with the BRAFV600E mutation [70, 71] showed high levels of both p-BRAF and KCNMA1 with a correspondingly hyper-activated BRAF/MAPK pathway. The co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels was therefore confirmed for this cell line. The same co-dependency of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels was then also recognized in the HEK293T cell line, which was derived from non-tumor tissue with wt BRAF. This p-BRAF and KCNMA1 level codependency in mammalian cells was highly reminiscent of that previously observed in Drosophila RafGOF glioma brains. Thus, we believe that the co-dependency of dRafGOF/p-BRAF and Slo/KCNMA1 is a conserved phenomenon occurring in many different cells and across various species.
It is known that the DBTRG-05MG cells are heterozygous for BRAFV600E and contain a copy of wt BRAF [70, 71]. BRAFV600E is highly phosphorylated as compared with its wt copy[6], which again resembles that observed in the Drosophila RafGOF glioma model [38, 72]. In particular, we noticed that the in slo or KCNMA1 knockdown experiments, dRafGOF or BRAFV600E levels decreased obviously while the endogenous wt counterparts remained unchanged. Therefore, it is likely that the p-dRafGOF or p-BRAFV600E is more susceptible for protein degradation. When the channel protein is knocked down, it is p-dRafGOF or p-BRAFV600E, rather than their wt counterparts that degrade quickly.
Two inhibitor experiments have uncovered interesting features of mutual regulations of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels in DBTRG-05MG cells. We found that the p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels remained unaffected even when MEK phosphorylation was inhibited by Dabrafenib [64]. Thus we propose that an unknown mechanism exists to relay the signals from p-BRAF to establish the KCNMA1 levels in glioma cells, and that this occurs without the involvement of p-MEK. Furthermore, in the presence of cromolyn, K+ channel activity was decreased [63], leading to lower levels of p-BRAF and diminished glioma cell viability. This result indicates that the K+ channel function is involved in the mutual regulation of p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels and suggests that the KCNMA1 channel could be a potential drug target specific for tumors that are induced by BRAF mutations.
The study here on HEK293T cells cultured with KCl provides a further clue why p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels are codependent. Treatment of KCl leads to membrane depolarization [65, 66], which in turn activates KCNMA1 channel activity [22, 23]. The fact that cells are able to cope with these membrane potential changes in the presence of KCNMA1 may be due to KCNMA1 being able to compensate for depolarization by promoting repolarization of the membrane potential [25]. Correspondingly, poor cell growth was then observed when such repolarization is inhibited by KCNMA1 knockdown in these depolarized cells. Based on this, we propose that the depolarization by BRAF mutations [20] may be an unhealthy condition for cell growth and that KCNMA1 acts to counter this and repolarize the membrane potential to re-optimize conditions for these cells. In this scenario, there must be a membrane potential-mediated mechanism that co-regulates p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels for optimal membrane potential. In this relationship, high levels of p-BRAF will therefore also require elevated expressions of KCNMA1, and vice versa. However, the exact nature of this membrane potential-mediated feedback loop remains to be elucidated.
In conclusion, our study reveals that p-BRAF and KCNMA1 levels are mutually regulated and co-dependent (Fig. 7f). In glioma cells, high levels of p-BRAFV600E leads to membrane depolarization and elevated KCNMA1 expression. Raised KCNMA1 then acts to repolarize the membrane potential and sustain p-BRAF levels, which promotes tumor cell proliferation. When KCNMA1 is knocked down, insufficient amounts of KCNMA1 are available to repolarize the membrane potential. Cell growth is therefore inhibited and p-BRAFV600E becomes degraded. Therefore, the co-dependency of KCNMA1 and p-BRAF is highlighted as critical for BRAF-mutated glioma progression and, due to this, KCNMA1 could be a valuable potential therapeutic drug target for the treatment of tumors with BRAF mutations.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. The manuscript has data included as electronic supplementary material.
References
Wan PT et al (2004) Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF. Cell 116(6):855–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00215-6
Davies H et al (2002) Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417(6892):949–954. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00766
Roskoski R Jr (2010) RAF protein-serine/threonine kinases: structure and regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 399(3):313–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.092
De Luca A et al (2012) The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and the PI3K/AKT signalling pathways: role in cancer pathogenesis and implications for therapeutic approaches. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16(Suppl 2):S17-27. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.2011.639361
Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G (2007) Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(4):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2109
Lavoie H, Therrien M (2015) Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(5):281–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3979
Samatar AA, Poulikakos PI (2014) Targeting RAS-ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13(12):928–942. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4281
Louis DN, The, et al (2021) WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106
Collins VP, Jones DT, Giannini C (2015) Pilocytic astrocytoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol 129(6):775–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1410-7
Jones DT et al (2008) Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas. Cancer Res 68(21):8673–8677. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-2097
Schindler G et al (2011) Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in 1,320 nervous system tumors reveals high mutation frequencies in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma and extra-cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol 121(3):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0802-6
Dougherty MJ et al (2010) Activating mutations in BRAF characterize a spectrum of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 12(7):621–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noq007
Lassaletta A et al (2017) Therapeutic and prognostic implications of BRAF V600E in pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 35(25):2934–2941. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.71.8726
Lim CS et al (2017) BRaf signaling principles unveiled by large-scale human mutation analysis with a rapid lentivirus-based gene replacement method. Genes Dev 31(6):537–552. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.294413.116
Yeh E et al (2018) Patient-derived iPSCs show premature neural differentiation and neuron type-specific phenotypes relevant to neurodevelopment. Mol Psychiatry 23(8):1687–1698. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.238
Gasser A et al (2010) Two Nedd4-binding motifs underlie modulation of sodium channel Nav1.6 by p38 MAPK. J Biol Chem 285(34):26149–26161. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.098681
Wittmack EK et al (2005) Voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.6 is modulated by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci 25(28):6621–6630. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0541-05.2005
Poolos NP, Bullis JB, Roth MK (2006) Modulation of h-channels in hippocampal pyramidal neurons by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci 26(30):7995–8003. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2069-06.2006
Koh HY et al (2018) BRAF somatic mutation contributes to intrinsic epileptogenicity in pediatric brain tumors. Nat Med 24(11):1662–1668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0172-x
Goz RU, Akgül G, LoTurco JJ (2020) BRAFV600E expression in neural progenitors results in a hyperexcitable phenotype in neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 123(6):2449–2464. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00523.2019
Pallanck L, Ganetzky B (1994) Cloning and characterization of human and mouse homologs of the Drosophila calcium-activated potassium channel gene, slowpoke. Hum Mol Genet 3(8):1239–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/3.8.1239
Magleby KL (2003) Gating mechanism of BK (Slo1) channels: so near, yet so far. J Gen Physiol 121(2):81–96. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028721
Horrigan FT, Aldrich RW (2002) Coupling between voltage sensor activation, Ca2+ binding and channel opening in large conductance (BK) potassium channels. J Gen Physiol 120(3):267–305. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028605
Robitaille R, Charlton MP (1992) Presynaptic calcium signals and transmitter release are modulated by calcium-activated potassium channels. J Neurosci 12(1):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.12-01-00297.1992
Petersen OH, Maruyama Y (1984) Calcium-activated potassium channels and their role in secretion. Nature 307(5953):693–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/307693a0
Basile MS et al (2019) KCNMA1 expression is downregulated in colorectal cancer via epigenetic mechanisms. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020245
Ma G et al (2017) KCNMA1 cooperating with PTK2 is a novel tumor suppressor in gastric cancer and is associated with disease outcome. Mol Cancer 16(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-017-0613-z
Ramírez A et al (2018) Calcium-activated potassium channels as potential early markers of human cervical cancer. Oncol Lett 15(5):7249–7254. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8187
Oeggerli M et al (2012) Role of KCNMA1 in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 7(8):e41664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041664
Khaitan D et al (2009) Role of KCNMA1 gene in breast cancer invasion and metastasis to brain. BMC Cancer 9:258. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-258
Mound A et al (2013) Molecular interaction and functional coupling between type 3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and BKCa channel stimulate breast cancer cell proliferation. Eur J Cancer 49(17):3738–3751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.013
Atkinson NS, Robertson GA, Ganetzky B (1991) A component of calcium-activated potassium channels encoded by the Drosophila slo locus. Science 253(5019):551–555. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857984
Singh S, Wu CF (1989) Complete separation of four potassium currents in Drosophila. Neuron 2(4):1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(89)90070-6
Elkins T, Ganetzky B, Wu CF (1986) A Drosophila mutation that eliminates a calcium-dependent potassium current. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83(21):8415–8419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.21.8415
Gribkoff VK, Starrett JE Jr, Dworetzky SI (2001) Maxi-K potassium channels: form, function, and modulation of a class of endogenous regulators of intracellular calcium. Neuroscientist 7(2):166–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840100700211
Fernández MP et al (2007) Impaired clock output by altered connectivity in the circadian network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(13):5650–5655. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608260104
Read RD (2011) Drosophila melanogaster as a model system for human brain cancers. Glia 59(9):1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.21148
Penman CL et al (2015) Current understanding of BRAF alterations in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic targeting in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Front Oncol 5:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00054
Sang R et al (2022) Mxc, a Drosophila homolog of mental retardation-associated gene NPAT, maintains neural stem cell fate. Cell Biosci 12(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00820-8
Wu D et al (2019) RanGAP-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport of Prospero regulates neural stem cell lifespan in Drosophila larval central brain. Aging Cell 18(1):e12854. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12854
Alfonso TB, Jones BW (2002) gcm2 promotes glial cell differentiation and is required with glial cells missing for macrophage development in Drosophila. Dev Biol 248(2):369–383. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0740
Elkins T, Ganetzky B, Wu C-F (1986) A gene affecting a calcium-dependent potassium current in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci 83:8415–8419
Elkins T, Ganetzky B (1988) The roles of potassium currents in Drosophila flight muscles. J Neurosci 8(2):428–434. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.08-02-00428.1988
Mulcahy Levy JM, McMahon M (2018) Linking brain tumors and epileptic seizures. Nat Med 24(11):1638–1639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0249-6
Xing H et al (2021) Clinical characteristics of BRAF V600E gene mutation in patients of epilepsy-associated brain tumor: a meta-analysis. J Mol Neurosci 71(9):1815–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-021-01837-3
Ganetzky B, Wu CF (1982) Indirect suppression involving behavioral mutants with altered nerve excitability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics 100(4):597–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/100.4.597
Kasbekar DP, Nelson JC, Hall LM (1987) Enhancer of seizure: a new genetic locus in Drosophila melanogaster defined by interactions with temperature-sensitive paralytic mutations. Genetics 116(3):423–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/116.3.423
Pavlidis P, Tanouye MA (1995) Seizures and failures in the giant fiber pathway of Drosophila bang-sensitive paralytic mutants. J Neurosci 15(8):5810–5819. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-08-05810.1995
Burg MG, Wu CF (2012) Mechanical and temperature stressor-induced seizure-and-paralysis behaviors in Drosophila bang-sensitive mutants. J Neurogenet 26(2):189–197. https://doi.org/10.3109/01677063.2012.690011
Sailer CA et al (2006) Immunolocalization of BK channels in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 24(2):442–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04936.x
Contet C et al (2016) BK channels in the central nervous system. Int Rev Neurobiol 128:281–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2016.04.001
Awasaki T et al (2008) Organization and postembryonic development of glial cells in the adult central brain of Drosophila. J Neurosci 28(51):13742–13753. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4844-08.2008
Stork T et al (2008) Organization and function of the blood–brain barrier in Drosophila. J Neurosci 28(3):587–597. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4367-07.2008
Whitfield ML et al (2006) Common markers of proliferation. Nat Rev Cancer 6(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1802
López-Sáez JF et al (1998) Cell proliferation and cancer. Histol Histopathol 13(4):1197–1214. https://doi.org/10.14670/hh-13.1197
Feitelson MA et al (2015) Sustained proliferation in cancer: mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. Semin Cancer Biol 35(Suppl):S25-s54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.02.006
Melnick MB, Perkins LA, Lee M, Ambrosio L, Perrimon N (1993) Developmental and molecular characterization of mutations in the Drosophila-rafserine/threonine protein kinase. Development 118:127–138
Haling JR et al (2014) Structure of the BRAF-MEK complex reveals a kinase activity independent role for BRAF in MAPK signaling. Cancer Cell 26(3):402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.007
Vido MJ et al (2018) BRAF splice variant resistance to RAF inhibitor requires enhanced MEK association. Cell Rep 25(6):1501.e3-1510.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.049
Cope N et al (2018) Mechanism of BRAF activation through biochemical characterization of the recombinant full-length protein. ChemBioChem 19(18):1988–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201800359
Shapiro GG, König P (1985) Cromolyn sodium: a review. Pharmacotherapy 5(3):156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1985.tb03412.x
Corcia A et al (1986) Characterization of the ion channel activity in planar bilayers containing IgE-Fc epsilon receptor and the cromolyn-binding protein. Embo j 5(5):849–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04294.x
Rask-Andersen M, Masuram S, Schiöth HB (2014) The druggable genome: Evaluation of drug targets in clinical trials suggests major shifts in molecular class and indication. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 54:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135943
Roskoski R Jr (2018) Targeting oncogenic Raf protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol Res 135:239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2018.08.013
Zubkov AY, Rollins KS, Zhang JH (2002) KCl activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in rabbit bailar artery. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293(1):660–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00241-3
Shim JH et al (2015) KCl mediates K(+) channel-activated mitogen-activated protein kinases signaling in wound healing. Arch Plast Surg 42(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.11
Weaver AK, Bomben VC, Sontheimer H (2006) Expression and function of calcium-activated potassium channels in human glioma cells. Glia 54(3):223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20364
Khaitan D, Ningaraj N (2019) Evidence of calcium-activated potassium channel subunit alpha-1 as a key promoter of glioma growth and tumorigenicity. Glioma 2(1):46
Catacuzzeno L et al (2015) Reconciling the discrepancies on the involvement of large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K channels in glioblastoma cell migration. Front Cell Neurosci 9:152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00152
Quentmeier H et al (2001) Immunocytochemical analysis of cell lines derived from solid tumors. J Histochem Cytochem 49(11):1369–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540104901105
Bignell GR et al (2010) Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 463(7283):893–898. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08768
Xia F et al (2008) Raf activation is regulated by tyrosine 510 phosphorylation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 6(5):e128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060128
Acknowledgements
We thank Fan Yang and Xiaoying Chen of the Department of Biophysics, Kidney Disease Center of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, for discussions on the manuscript. Special thanks to Xi Huang for the initial suggestion and the fly stocks; we thank Chris Wood of the College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, for English language support. We thank Tsinghua Stock Center and Bloomington Stock Center (BDSC) for the fly stocks and the Core Facility of Drosophila Resource and Technology of CAS for fly microinjections. We thank Hongqing Liang, Linyong Du for cell lines. We thank Qiong Huang, Jingyao Chen, Chengcheng Zhang and Yajun Yu from the Core Facilities, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine for their technical support.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1004904; 2013CB945601).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. XY, YX and SX conceived the idea of the project and designed the experiments. SX, CX performed the experiments. CX, CW contributed to clinical sample collections. CW, YL, JD, RS, ZL, JH and WG contributed to project discussion and coordination. SX and CX wrote the initial manuscript. XY, and YX revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Research Ethics Board at the Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (2022-IRB-181).
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.
Consent to publish
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Fig. 4a, b and Table 1.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, S., Xu, C., Wu, C. et al. Co-dependent regulation of p-BRAF and potassium channel KCNMA1 levels drives glioma progression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 80, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04708-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04708-9