Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

, Volume 74, Issue 22, pp 4049–4057 | Cite as

Wallerian demyelination: chronicle of a cellular cataclysm

  • Nicolas Tricaud
  • Hwan Tae Park
Open Access


Wallerian demyelination is characteristic of peripheral nerve degeneration after traumatic injury. After axonal degeneration, the myelinated Schwann cell undergoes a stereotypical cellular program that results in the disintegration of the myelin sheath, a process termed demyelination. In this review, we chronologically describe this program starting from the late and visible features of myelin destruction and going backward to the initial molecular steps that trigger the nuclear reprogramming few hours after injury. Wallerian demyelination is a wonderful model for myelin degeneration occurring in the diverse forms of demyelinating peripheral neuropathies that plague human beings.


Myelin Degeneration Peripheral nervous system Schwann cells Wallerian demyelination Cellular reprogramming 



p75 neurotrophin receptor


Neural cell adhesion molecule


Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor


Brain-derived neurotrophic factor


Early growth response protein 2


Myelin protein zero


Myelin basic protein


Activator protein 1


Notch intracellular domain


Sex determining region Y-box 2


Mitogen-activated protein kinases


Extracellular signal-regulated kinases




Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase


Activating transcription factor 3


Guanosine triphosphate hydrolase


Demyelination is a tricky word to pronounce (phonetic: Open image in new window ) but it is nevertheless critical in human health. In the peripheral nervous system, myelin made by Schwann cells covers the majority of the axons and the loss of this myelin is termed peripheral demyelination. For clinicians, demyelination merely means the status of the nerve when myelin is gone but for biologists this also means the process through which Schwann cells lose their myelin (demyelinating cells). Indeed peripheral demyelination does not result from Schwann cells death but from a dedifferentiation process that transforms a myelinated Schwann cell into a demyelinated Schwann cell. This last cell is able to remyelinate during nerve regeneration.

The causes of peripheral demyelination are multiple: toxic (tellurium or diphtheric for example), metabolic (diabetes), infectious (Mycobacterium leprae), hereditary (Charcot–Marie–Tooth diseases), immune (Guillain–Barré syndrome, CIDP), thermic (hot or cold burn), ischemic, or traumatic (nerve compression, crush, or cut). Traumatic nerve injury induces Wallerian degeneration, which includes axonal degeneration and the subsequent Wallerian demyelination. Wallerian demyelination is the most common cause of peripheral nerve demyelination and probably everyone in this world has suffered this at least once. Indeed the smallest cut may easily sever a nerve bundle in the skin leading to pain, axonal degeneration, and Schwann cells demyelination. In peripheral nerves, neuronal plasticity allows axons to grow back and the nerve bundle to regenerate [1]. However, elimination of myelin is critical as myelin proteins are known to inhibit axonal regeneration [1]. Finally, demyelinated Schwann cells then remyelinate axons to restore the full nerve function.

Because nerve cut or crush induces a synchronized demyelination of Schwann cells downstream of the injury in the nerve, Wallerian demyelination has been the model of choice to study molecular and cellular mechanisms of demyelination. Recent cell biology investigations revealed that Wallerian demyelination is a stereotyped succession of molecular and cellular steps that lead to myelin degradation and loss. Microscopically visible events such as formation of myelin ovoids (small cellular chambers containing myelin clump) are typical of the late stages of Schwann cell demyelination and they were characterized using light and electron microscopy early in the twentieth century. However, these visible events result from early invisible molecular processes that occur in Schwann cell. These invisible processes were characterized only recently using new imaging, genetic, molecular, and cellular technologies.

Our goal here is to review both late cellular and early molecular processes that lead to Wallerian demyelination in Schwann cells. We propose to start with late events and to go back in time toward the initial event(s) that triggers demyelination following axonal degeneration.

Wallerian demyelination

As originally described by Waller in 1850, degeneration of peripheral nerves after injury is announced by the production of numerous small chambers along the distal stump of peripheral nerves [2]. These drastic changes of myelin morphology are accompanied by the biochemical destruction of the myelin sheath, which appears prominently 1 week after injury. Indeed biochemical signs of demyelination such as myelin protein digestion, drop of lipid content, and cholesterol ester sharply increase after 1 week [3, 4, 5, 6]. Before these late degenerative events are observed by biochemical and histochemical analyses, morphological changes in the myelin sheath can be detected during the first week post-injury and they can be conveniently divided into an early stage (up to 3 day) and a later stage (3–6 days) based on two pronounced characteristic features: complete axonal degeneration and macrophage infiltration. During the early stage, Schwann cell response to nerve injury is obvious as myelin ovoids appear in the cytoplasm and paranodal loops retract on the degenerating axon [7, 8, 9]. Molecularly, Schwann cells are also dedifferentiating into an immature state [10]. During the later stage (3–6 days), the number of macrophages sharply increases and these cells also start to digest myelin fragments expulsed by demyelinating Schwann cells [11, 12]. Actually since myelin ovoids retain obvious myelin structures under electron microscopy and because chemical destruction of the myelin has barely started by 1 week after injury, myelin disintegration (or breakdown) has been considered to be better terminology to describe the Schwann cell demyelination process that generates myelin ovoid [6, 12, 13, 14]. However alongside myelin ovoid formation, it has recently been suggested that myelin digestion by Schwann cells themselves also plays an important role in the biochemical destruction of myelin sheath early during Wallerian demyelination [15, 16, 17, 18]. Thus, Schwann cell demyelination may encompass both myelin disintegration and digestion even though the respective role of each process has never been formally demonstrated.

Recent studies have demonstrated that this degenerative process of demyelination by Schwann cells is not limited to Wallerian degeneration. In hereditary demyelinating neuropathy, Schwann cell phenotype changes very much as in Wallerian degeneration [19]. In addition, demyelination induced by toxic material or immune attacks in inflammatory neuropathies also shows paranodal retraction, myelin clump—which is actually not ovoid in the respect of intact axon—and dedifferentiation indicating that these features also contribute to pathologic demyelination in various neuropathic diseases [20, 21, 22, 23]. Thus, the understanding of mechanistic aspects of Schwann cell demyelination in Wallerian degeneration might provide an important insight into the pathognomonic mechanism of demyelinating neuropathies.

24 h to 3 days: myelin collapse

During the early period of Wallerian degeneration, the generation of myelin ovoids is theoretically helpful for the clearance of compact myelin sheath within Schwann cells. Since Young described the myelin fragmentation process as the result of surface tension generated by myelin itself [24], there was not much progress in the understanding of the myelin ovoid formation during Wallerian degeneration. The active involvement of Schwann cell in the generation of these small chambers was first seen as a “contraction” of reactive and hypertrophic cells [13]. Successive morphological analysis using electron microscopy by Webster [9] and Ghabriel and Allt [25] showed the stereotypic segmentation of myelin at Schmidt–Lanterman incisures. These incisures are cellular channel of cytoplasm, crossing the compact myelin in order to “irrigate” the cell [26]. Incisures collapse occurred with an increase of cytoplasm in existing incisures, incisures dilatation, and not with de novo generation of new incisures. The apparent increased number of incisures in injured nerves probably results from small uncomplete incisures being more visible [7, 25, 27, 28]. Since adherens junctions and junctional proteins such as E-cadherin present in incisures are destroyed during Wallerian degeneration [18, 29], it is unlikely that more incisures form de novo at that time. Instead, the junctional destruction may allow an increase of cytoplasm in incisures that would make them more visible in demyelinating conditions. In this sense, junctional destruction in incisures may be a first step in the initiation of myelin fragmentation. The dilatation of incisures is not limited to Wallerian degeneration as it is reported in many other demyelinating conditions including the segmental demyelination of inflammatory neuropathies [30, 31, 32]. Furthermore, duplication of peripheral myelin protein 22 gene responsible for hereditary peripheral neuropathy Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease 1A resulted in an abnormal actin structure in incisures [33, 34]. Thus, the alteration of incisural structure may be a general pathognomonic feature of demyelinating neuropathies in the nerve.

The junctional complex composed of E-cadherin/catenins is highly localized to outer mesaxon, Schmidt–Lanterman incisures, and paranodal area. Its molecular composition is very similar to epithelial adherens junctions [35, 36]. The maintenance of compact myelin structure in adult nerves requires not only myelin proteins but also appropriate localization of this junctional complex in non-compact regions including incisures [36]. There seems to be a specific mechanism by which these junctional structures in non-compact areas are dismantled during Wallerian degeneration. First of all, the selective destruction of E-cadherin is dependent on actin polymerization [18]. In normal nerves, F-actin is highly enriched in incisures [37] and new actin polymerization occurs within these structures shortly after nerve injury. The inhibition of the actin polymerization not only prevents E-cadherin destruction but also myelin fragmentation. This is actually the earliest event that relates molecular changes occurring in Schwann cells to myelin fragmentation after nerve injury. Interestingly, although the protein level of β-catenin, an intracellular component of adherens junction, is not significantly reduced during Wallerian degeneration (unpublished observation), β-catenin is released from dissolved junctional region and translocated into the Schwann cell nucleus in an actin polymerization-dependent manner, illustrating the dissolution of junctional structures [18]. The role of nuclear translocation of β-catenin in Schwann cells after injury has not been determined yet.

However, actin polymerization-dependent junctional destruction does not seem to be sufficient to complete myelin fragmentation during Wallerian degeneration. Indeed the disappearance of the axon during Wallerian degeneration allows the apposition and the fusion of the innermost plasma membrane at incisures (Fig. 1). The resulting transverse cleavage requires simultaneous plasma membrane severance and repair for closing myelin around ovoids [25, 26]. This membrane remodeling seems to require a function of lysosomal enzymes which are recently considered to be essential components for membrane repair in various cellular phenomena [38, 39, 40]. Holtzman and collaborators showed the activation of lysosome in Schwann cells after injury [41]. In accordance with this, the expression of Lysosomal Associated Membrane Protein-1 (LAMP-1), a lysosomal marker, is dramatically increased in injured nerves and initially localize to incisures during myelin fragmentation [21, 42]. Morphological analyses showed that myelin membrane cleavage is not complete in peri-incisural areas when lysosome was inhibited [21] indicating that myelin fragmentation into small chamber, that definitely employs membrane cleavage/repair processes, requires lysosomal activity (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Illustration of the different steps occuring in a myelinated Schwann cell during Wallerian demyelination. The timeframe is shown at the top and between each timepoint the different events occuring in the cell during the respective time period are shown

Interestingly, it was recently shown that lysosomal function is actually related to an autophagy process in Wallerian demyelination (Fig. 1) [15, 21]. Autophagy is a self-eating process for recycling cellular organelles including mitochondria and peroxisome during diverse cellular events. Autophagy initiates with the formation of an isolation membrane that extends around the target organelle to form an autophagosome, which finally fuse with lysosome for the degradation of the target [43]. After peripheral nerve injury, autophagy is activated within a day in Schwann cells and mice defective for autophagy in these cells specifically exhibited delayed biochemical myelin destruction and stable compact myelin sheath even 7 days after injury [15, 21]. This is in line with the role of lysosome in myelin fragmentation. In addition, autophagy and lysosome activation have also been shown to occur in peripheral nerves during inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy, tellurium-induced neuropathy, and hereditary demyelinating neuropathy [15, 21, 44, 45]. So it is very likely that autophagy and lysosome activation is a common mechanism for Schwann cells to demyelinate in various type of demyelinating neuropathies.

4–24 h: cellular reprogramming and dedifferentiation

Before myelin collapse, 24 h after the initiation of Wallerian demyelination, very little changes are observed in the myelin sheath, but a complete revolution has nevertheless been engaged in the cell. Indeed demyelination is not a mere degenerative process resulting in apoptotic or necrotic cell death, but it represents a deep reprogramming of the myelinated Schwann cell [46]. Indeed the cell dedifferentiates and re-expresses genes that were active in the pro-myelinating cell or in the previous immature states [47, 48, 49]. However, while the demyelinating Schwann cell is morphologically and biochemically close to a pro-myelinating cell [10, 50], it is not just a phenocopy: Schwann cell also expresses during demyelination genes that were not expressed previously such as Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) and Olig1 [51, 52].

This step of cellular reprogramming, which starts in the nucleus around 4 h after nerve injury, is a key point to understand demyelination but it remains largely uncharted. The best characterized event in this step is the activation of the leucine-zipper zinc-finger transcription factor, c-Jun (Fig. 1). This factor is a key component of the AP-1 transcription complex and the terminal effector of the Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway (e.g., [53]). During Wallerian demyelination, c-Jun is strongly upregulated as early as 4 h after nerve injury with a maximum activation at 12 h [54, 55]. Reducing c-Jun expression in Schwann cells significantly delays demyelination and impairs functional recovery after nerve injury [51, 55]. This transcription factor appears as a key factor of the Schwann cell reprogramming as it upregulates genes related to neuronal growth and regeneration such as N-cadherin, p75NTR, and NCAM, and the signaling molecules GDNF, artemin, Shh, and BDNF, and it downregulates myelin-related genes expression such as Egr2, Mpz, Mbp, periaxin, and E-cadherin [51, 55, 56]. C-Jun targets also include genes involved in the morphogenetic and the myelin clearing processes observed during demyelination [51, 57]. In particular, JNK-c-Jun pathway stimulates the injury-induced autophagic flux in Schwann cells [15].

Another trigger for cell reprogramming is probably the Notch pathway and its nuclear component NICD, which is also activated during Wallerian demyelination (Fig. 1). If the stimulation of this pathway is sufficient to induce demyelination in vivo [58], the molecular mechanisms that activates the pathway and mediate its effect on the cell genome remain unknown.

Beyond transcriptional changes induced by c-Jun and Notch activation several additional modifications occur in the nucleus during demyelination. Sox2, one of the group of transcription factors that induce pluripotent stem cells from adult somatic cells [59], is strongly upregulated in Schwann cells during Wallerian demyelination [60], suggesting an increased chromatin plasticity. Interestingly Sox2 remains normally upregulated in injured nerves of mice deleted for c-Jun indicating it is not genetically downstream of c-Jun [55]. So an additional mechanism may activate Sox2 expression and transcriptional plasticity in demyelinating cells (Fig. 1). Histone deacetylase HDAC2 is also upregulated 24 h after nerve injury in mouse sciatic nerve [61]. This epigenetic factor promotes the expression of Oct6, a key pro-myelinating factor that represses c-Jun activation. This slows down the cell reprogramming and, together with HDAC1, allows the synchronization of remyelination after axon regeneration [61]. To go further, DNA methylation [62] and Polycomb complex [52] have been shown to be involved in Wallerian demyelination, confirming that Schwann cell also undergoes epigenetic remodeling of the genome that leads to the spectacular fragmentation of the myelin sheath.

One path that Schwann cells follow when they demyelinate is probably the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Fig. 1), the process through which epithelial cells acquire migration and proliferation abilities. First, EMT factors Zeb2 was recently shown to be upregulated 6 h after nerve injury and when the gene was deleted Schwann cells were able to demyelinate but could not remyelinate [63, 64]. Zeb2 deletion did not affect c-Jun and Sox2 upregulation after nerve injury [63] but antagonized inhibitory effects of Notch and Sox2 on myelination [64]. This suggests that Zeb2 acts downstream of c-Jun and Sox2 and participates to remyelination by inhibiting dedifferentiation signals rather than activating demyelination process. Similarly, we found that Snai2, another gene characteristic of EMT, was upregulated after nerve injury in the sciatic nerve of mice (NT unpublished data). Second, EMT is characterized by a shift from E-cadherin expression in the epithelial phenotype to N-cadherin expression in the mesenchymal phenotype [65]. In peripheral nerves, E-cadherin is expressed in myelinating Schwann cells [36], while N-cadherin is expressed in pro-myelinating cells and precursors and re-expressed in demyelinating cells [66] (Fig. 1). Finally, the nuclear translocation of β-catenin in dedifferentiating Schwann cells following injury [18] may also represent an EMT-like process during demyelination. As myelinating Schwann cells show an epithelial-like polarization [67], these data suggest that demyelination is an EMT-like process where epithelial-like myelinated Schwann cell is reprogrammed to mesenchymal-like demyelinated cell.

1–4 h: mitochondria and MAPK pathways ignite and amplify the demyelination signal

Starting around 4 h after nerve injury, Schwann cell reprogramming, which follows c-Jun, Notch, and Sox2 activation, leads 20 h later to the first signs of myelin collapse and, 2 days later, to the complete disintegration of the myelin sheath. As Wallerian demyelination is triggered by axonal injury and degeneration, in order to reach the Schwann cell nucleus, axonal signal(s) have to be transduced into the glial cell and propagated in the cytoplasm. The role of MAPK pathways in this process is well documented.

Indeed, ERK1/2 signaling is robustly activated around 4 h after nerve injury [54, 68, 69, 70] and activation of the raf/MEK/ERK pathway is sufficient to induce demyelination of Schwann cells in vitro and in vivo [68, 71] (Fig. 1). Blocking this pathway partially prevented demyelination [71]; however, it did not prevent c-Jun activation [72, 73], suggesting that additional mechanisms are involved.

Indeed p38 is activated in Schwann cells as soon as 15 min after nerve injury in the lesion area and a bit later, 6 h, in more distal parts [74, 75, 76, 77] (Fig. 1). Pharmacological inhibition of p38 activation or the enzyme deletion hindered demyelination, while its pharmacological activation in non-injured nerves was sufficient to induce both c-Jun phosphorylation and demyelination [76, 77, 78] ].

Another early event reported in Schwann cells after nerve injury is Rac1 activation and actin polymerization in Schmitt–Lanterman incisures [18]. While this actin polymerization is one of the first steps in the collapse of incisures occurring later during demyelination, it is not directly involved in c-Jun activation [18]. However, Rac1 has been shown to be essential for the activation of MKK7/JNK pathway in Schwann cells in culture suggesting this MAPK pathway may participate in c-Jun phosphorylation and demyelination [73] (Fig. 1). Indeed, while MKK7 activation promoted c-Jun phosphorylation in cultures [55] Rac1, MKK7 and JNK inhibition prevented it in nerve explant [73]. JNK expression and phosphorylation are quickly increased following injury in mouse sciatic nerves [55, 73] and ATF3, a transcription factor translocated in the nucleus after c-Jun activation via JNK, is also upregulated in Schwann cell nucleus [79]. However, as it has been reported that JNK activation is also a major event during axonal degeneration/regeneration after axotomy, it is possible therefore that JNK phosphorylation in injured nerves results from axonal injury and not from Schwann cell demyelination. ATF3 upregulation in Schwann cells nuclei may also result from c-Jun activation via p38 instead of JNK. So the role of MKK7/JNK pathway during Wallerian demyelination remains unclear.

The use of multiple MAPK pathways to induce the demyelination program in Schwann cells suggests that, beyond c-Jun and Sox2, numerous transcription and cotranscription factors are targeted during the process, underlining the concept of reprogramming (Fig. 1). In addition, it is very likely that multiple signaling pathways and basic cellular processes are affected by MAPK in demyelinating Schwann cells. Thus, Schwann cells physiology probably changes even before transcriptional modifications occur.

What is the origin of this massive and broad signaling resulting from the recruitment of MAPK pathways? Recently, we questioned the role of Schwann cell mitochondria during Wallerian degeneration. Using fluorescent probes targeted to mitochondria of Schwann cells in the crushed sciatic nerve of living mice [80], they found that mitochondria release a pulse of calcium in the cytoplasm just 1 h after crush. This mitochondrial calcium wave was necessary and sufficient to activate MAPK pathways and phosphorylate c-Jun thereafter (NT unpublished results). This indicates that mitochondria play an initial and central role during Schwann cell demyelination by releasing calcium that activates MAPK pathways (Fig. 1). In addition, this places mitochondria as the first target of an axonally initiated signal inside Schwann cells during Wallerian demyelination. Interestingly c-Jun upregulation that occurs in Schwann cells after crush was not prevented by blocking mitochondrial calcium release (NT unpublished results), showing that a mitochondria-independent pathway is likely to be also involved.

0–1 h: axonally derived signal is transduced in Schwann cells

Just like the very first moment of the Big Bang of the universe is crucial and unclear, the very first event(s) that triggers the Wallerian demyelination in Schwann cells is not known. There are many ways the Schwann cell can enter in the demyelination program but when a myelinated axon is severed, demyelination is triggered in less than 1 h in the distal part of the sciatic nerve and still the molecular triggers are not known. One hypothesis has nevertheless been raised.

In 2005, Guertin and collaborators [81] reported that as soon as 10 min after sciatic nerve cut, ErbB2/3 receptors were selectively phosphorylated in the distal clump of the nerve. Interestingly, this receptor activation did not last long—few hours—but a second long lasting activation appeared 3 days after the injury, suggesting that ErbB receptors were involved in two successive steps during Wallerian demyelination. Very early on, ErbB receptors phosphorylation occurred first in Schwann cell microvilli that cover the node of Ranvier and then propagated to the outer plasma membrane, abaxonal side, at the Schwann cell extremities [81] (Fig. 1). Pharmacologically inhibiting the receptors activation delayed Wallerian demyelination. As ErbB2/3 receptors is activated by Neuregulin 1, this suggested that this molecule, while required for Schwann cell survival, proliferation, and myelination [82], could also induce demyelination. Indeed it was also reported that Neuregulin 1-ErbB2 acted upstream of rac1-GTPase to regulate actin polymerization during Wallerian degeneration and inhibition of rac1 GTPase suppressed myelin fragmentation [18]. In addition, the aberrant activation of ErbB2 by M. leprae has been shown to lead to demyelination [83]. So a model of the initial Wallerian demyelination event includes the activation of ErbB2/3 receptors by Neuregulin 1 and the following amplification of the signal through Rac-MKK7-JNK and Ras-MEF-ERK1/2 pathways [68, 71, 73]. However, this model is not complete as genetic ablation of ErbB2 in adult Schwann cells did not produce a noticeable phenotype during Wallerian demyelination [84]. In addition, at the present time, there is no evidence that Neuregulin 1 or any other molecules that activates ErbB2/3 receptors is involved in triggering Wallerian demyelination. Thus, the signal that initiates Wallerian demyelination is still enigmatic and further studies addressing this issue are required not only for understanding the mechanism but also for providing therapeutic opportunities in the treatment of demyelinating diseases.

Conclusion and perspectives

While the troubles resulting from the loss of myelin in peripheral nerves are serious and common enough in humans to define a specific class of peripheral neuropathy, limiting the term “demyelination” to the loss of myelin is strongly restrictive because they are many ways through which myelin can be lost. Among these different ways, Wallerian demyelination resulting from traumatic nerve injury is both the most common cause of demyelination and the simplest model of Schwann cell demyelination process. This model has been instrumental in the molecular and cellular characterization of the dedifferentiation process. More data and experiments are required to fully characterize Wallerian demyelination but a clear picture is already emerging. In order to consolidate it, more effort will probably be needed characterizing late visible “macroscopic” events such as ovoids formation and destruction. In addition other concomitants cellular events such as mitochondrial and metabolic changes and miRNA and small non coding RNA activity would probably add significantly to the global picture of Wallerian demyelination.

The most critical point is probably the earliest events that occur in Schwann cells when the axon initiates its self-destruction. Indeed, Wallerian demyelination appears to start in an amplification pathway that spreads from the extremities of the myelin to the nucleus of the Schwann cell. This molecular amplification allows the multiple changes that are required to dedifferentiate the cell. This scheme is characteristic of a program that always initiates from a code source. So if the final goal of scientists and medical doctors is to prevent pathological demyelination, then there is no use to try to target some factors involved in the program because alternative parallel events are probably already in course toward the deadly end. The only logical way would be to target the initial trigger of the program. Therefore, the earliest events are targets of choice for a therapeutic approach.

Finally, we have here limited our study to the Wallerian demyelination process, mostly reporting in vivo events following nerve crush or cut because in vitro or ex vivo demyelination models are prone to artifacts. Wallerian demyelination is not pathological because it is the natural response to the destruction of the axon. In the absence of demyelination axons do not regenerate and regrowth properly [1], so it is no use to prevent Wallerian demyelination. It is however worth noting that similar molecular and cellular events have been reported in many models of pathological peripheral nerve demyelination such as hereditary, toxic, metabolic, or autoimmune diseases. This suggests that while there are many ways through which demyelination can be triggered a similar or even identical program is engaged in all these demyelinating diseases. In these conditions, provided one can target the right earliest event of the program, it could be possible to block Schwann cell demyelination in the long term in multiple diseases with the same tool.



NT is grateful for the support of European research council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC 311610) and ATIP-Avenir program. HTP is grateful for the support of National Research Foundation of Korea (2014R1A2A2A01002566 and 2016R1A5A2007009).


  1. 1.
    Rao SNR, Pearse DD (2016) Regulating axonal responses to injury: the intersection between signaling pathways involved in axon myelination and the inhibition of axon regeneration. Front Mol Neurosci 9:33. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoll G, Jander S, Myers RR (2002) Degeneration and regeneration of the peripheral nervous system: from Augustus Waller’s observations to neuroinflammation. J Peripher Nerv Syst 7:13–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson AC, McNabb AR, Rossiter RJ (1950) Chemistry of wallerian degeneration; a review of recent studies. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 64:105–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noback CR, Montagna W (1952) Histochemical studies of the myelin sheath and its fragmentation products during Wallerian (secondary) degeneration. I. Lipids. J Comp Neurol 97:211–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noback CR, Reilly JA (1956) Myelin sheath during degeneration and regeneration. II. Histochemistry. J Comp Neurol 105:333–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beuche W, Friede RL (1984) The role of non-resident cells in Wallerian degeneration. J Neurocytol 13:767–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams PL, Hall SM (1971) Chronic Wallerian degeneration—an in vivo and ultrastructural study. J Anat 109:487–503PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams PL, Hall SM (1971) Prolonged in vivo observations of normal peripheral nerve fibres and their acute reactions to crush and deliberate trauma. J Anat 108:397–408. doi: 10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7580 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Webster HF (1965) The relationship between Schmidt–Lantermann incisures and myelin segmentation during Wallerian degeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 122:29–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jessen KR, Mirsky R (2008) Negative regulation of myelination: relevance for development, injury, and demyelinating disease. Glia 56:1552–1565. doi: 10.1002/glia.20761 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirata K, Kawabuchi M (2002) Myelin phagocytosis by macrophages and nonmacrophages during Wallerian degeneration. Microsc Res Tech 57:541–547. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Daly JA, Imaeda T (1967) Electron microscopic study of Wallerian degeneration in cutaneous nerves caused by mechanical injury. Lab Investig 17:744–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friede RL, Martinez AJ (1970) Analysis of axon-sheath relations during early Wallerian degeneration. Brain Res 19:199–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scheidt P, Waehneldt TV, Beuche W, Friede RL (1986) Changes of myelin proteins during Wallerian degeneration in situ and in millipore diffusion chambers preventing active phagocytosis. Brain Res 379:380–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomez-Sanchez JA, Carty L, Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta M et al (2015) Schwann cell autophagy, myelinophagy, initiates myelin clearance from injured nerves. J Cell Biol 210:153–168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201503019 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niemi JP, DeFrancesco-Lisowitz A, Roldán-Hernández L et al (2013) A critical role for macrophages near axotomized neuronal cell bodies in stimulating nerve regeneration. J Neurosci 33:16236–16248. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3319-12.2013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry VH, Tsao JW, Fearn S, Brown MC (1995) Radiation-induced reductions in macrophage recruitment have only slight effects on myelin degeneration in sectioned peripheral nerves of mice. Eur J Neurosci 7:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung J, Cai W, Lee HK et al (2011) Actin polymerization is essential for myelin sheath fragmentation during Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci 31:2009–2015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-10.2011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martini R, Klein D, Groh J (2013) Similarities between inherited demyelinating neuropathies and Wallerian degeneration. Am J Pathol 183:655–660. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toews AD, Griffiths IR, Kyriakides E et al (1992) Primary demyelination induced by exposure to tellurium alters Schwann cell gene expression: a model for intracellular targeting of NGF receptor. J Neurosci 12:3676–3687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang SY, Shin YK, Park SY et al (2016) Autophagic myelin destruction by Schwann cells during Wallerian degeneration and segmental demyelination. Glia 64:730–742. doi: 10.1002/glia.22957 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roberson MD, Toews AD, Bouldin TW et al (1995) NGFR-mRNA expression in sciatic nerve: a sensitive indicator of early stages of axonopathy. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 28:231–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutton EJ, Carty L, Laurá M et al (2011) c-Jun expression in human neuropathies: a pilot study. J Peripher Nerv Syst 16:295–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00360.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holmes W, Young JZ (1942) Nerve regeneration after immediate and delayed suture. J Anat 77(63–96):10. doi: 10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7580 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghabriel MN, Allt G (1979) The role of Schmidt–Lanterman incisures in Wallerian degeneration. II. An electron microscopic study. Acta Neuropathol 48:95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ghabriel MN, Allt G (1981) Incisures of Schmidt–Lanterman. Prog Neurobiol 17:25–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghabriel MN, Allt G (1979) The role of Schmidt–Lanterman incisures in Wallerian degeneration. I. A quantitative teased fibre study. Acta Neuropathol 48:93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sotnikov OS (1966) Structure of Schmidt–Lantermann incisures. Fed Proc Transl Suppl 25:204–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hasegawa M, Seto A, Uchiyama N et al (1996) Localization of E-cadherin in peripheral glia after nerve injury and repair. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 55:424–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wiśniewski H, Raine CS (1971) An ultrastructural study of experimental demyelination and remyelination. V. Central and peripheral nervous system lesions caused by diphtheria toxin. Lab Investig 25:73–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saida K, Saida T, Brown MJ et al (1978) Antiserum-mediated demyelination in vivo: a sequential study using intraneural injection of experimental allergic neuritis serum. Lab Investig 39:449–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bradley WG, Jennekens FG (1971) Axonal degeneration in diphtheritic neuropathy. J Neurol Sci 13:415–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee S, Amici S, Tavori H et al (2014) PMP22 is critical for actin-mediated cellular functions and for establishing lipid rafts. J Neurosci 34:16140–16152. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1908-14.2014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu B, Arpag S, Zhang X et al (2016) Tuning PAK activity to rescue abnormal myelin permeability in HNPP. PLoS Genet 12:e1006290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006290 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fannon AM, Sherman DL, Ilyina-Gragerova G et al (1995) Novel E-cadherin-mediated adhesion in peripheral nerve: Schwann cell architecture is stabilized by autotypic adherens junctions. J Cell Biol 129:189–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tricaud N, Perrin-Tricaud C, Brusés JL, Rutishauser U (2005) Adherens junctions in myelinating Schwann cells stabilize Schmidt–Lanterman incisures via recruitment of p120 catenin to E-cadherin. J Neurosci 25:3259–3269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5168-04.2005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trapp BD, Andrews SB, Wong A et al (1989) Co-localization of the myelin-associated glycoprotein and the microfilament components, F-actin and spectrin, in Schwann cells of myelinated nerve fibres. J Neurocytol 18:47–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reddy A, Caler EV, Andrews NW (2001) Plasma membrane repair is mediated by Ca(2+)-regulated exocytosis of lysosomes. Cell 106:157–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Corrotte M, Castro-Gomes T, Koushik AB, Andrews NW (2015) Approaches for plasma membrane wounding and assessment of lysosome-mediated repair responses. Methods Cell Biol 126:139–158. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.11.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Feeney EJ, Spampanato C, Puertollano R et al (2013) What else is in store for autophagy? Exocytosis of autolysosomes as a mechanism of TFEB-mediated cellular clearance in Pompe disease. Autophagy 9:1117–1118. doi: 10.4161/auto.24920 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Holtzman E, Novikoff AB (1965) Lysomes in the rat sciatic nerve following crush. J Cell Biol 27:651–669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee HK, Shin YK, Jung J et al (2009) Proteasome inhibition suppresses Schwann cell dedifferentiation in vitro and in vivo. Glia 57:1825–1834. doi: 10.1002/glia.20894 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rubinsztein DC, Codogno P, Levine B (2012) Autophagy modulation as a potential therapeutic target for diverse diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11:709–730. doi: 10.1038/nrd3802 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Calle E, Berciano MT, Fernández R, Lafarga M (1999) Activation of the autophagy, c-FOS and ubiquitin expression, and nucleolar alterations in Schwann cells precede demyelination in tellurium-induced neuropathy. Acta Neuropathol 97:143–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weller RO, Mellick RS (1966) Acid phosphatase and lysosome activity in diphtheritic neuropathy and Wallerian degeneration. Br J Exp Pathol 47:425–434PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jessen KR, Mirsky R (2016) The repair Schwann cell and its function in regenerating nerves. J Physiol (Lond) 594:3521–3531. doi: 10.1113/JP270874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brosius Lutz A, Barres BA (2014) Contrasting the glial response to axon injury in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Dev Cell 28:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nagarajan R, Le N, Mahoney H et al (2002) Deciphering peripheral nerve myelination by using Schwann cell expression profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8998–9003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132080999 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patodia S, Raivich G (2012) Role of transcription factors in peripheral nerve regeneration. Front Mol Neurosci 5:8. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chen Z-L, Yu W-M, Strickland S (2007) Peripheral regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:209–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094337 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Arthur-Farraj PJ, Latouche M, Wilton DK et al (2012) c-Jun reprograms Schwann cells of injured nerves to generate a repair cell essential for regeneration. Neuron 75:633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ma KH, Hung HA, Srinivasan R et al (2015) Regulation of peripheral nerve myelin maintenance by gene repression through polycomb repressive complex 2. J Neurosci 35:8640–8652. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2257-14.2015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mechta-Grigoriou F, Gerald D, Yaniv M (2001) The mammalian Jun proteins: redundancy and specificity. Oncogene 20:2378–2389. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204381 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee HJ, Shin YK, Park HT (2014) Mitogen activated protein kinase family proteins and c-jun signaling in injury-induced Schwann cell plasticity. Exp Neurobiol 23:130–137. doi: 10.5607/en.2014.23.2.130 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Parkinson DB, Bhaskaran A, Arthur-Farraj P et al (2008) c-Jun is a negative regulator of myelination. J Cell Biol 181:625–637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200803013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fontana X, Hristova M, Da Costa C et al (2012) c-Jun in Schwann cells promotes axonal regeneration and motoneuron survival via paracrine signaling. J Cell Biol 198:127–141. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201205025 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hung HA, Sun G, Keles S, Svaren J (2015) Dynamic regulation of Schwann cell enhancers after peripheral nerve injury. J Biol Chem 290:6937–6950. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.622878 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Woodhoo A, Alonso MBD, Droggiti A et al (2009) Notch controls embryonic Schwann cell differentiation, postnatal myelination and adult plasticity. Nat Publ Group 12:839–847. doi: 10.1038/nn.2323 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Le N, Nagarajan R, Wang JYT et al (2005) Analysis of congenital hypomyelinating Egr2Lo/Lo nerves identifies Sox2 as an inhibitor of Schwann cell differentiation and myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2596–2601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407836102 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brügger V, Duman M, Bochud M et al (2017) Delaying histone deacetylase response to injury accelerates conversion into repair Schwann cells and nerve regeneration. Nat Commun 8:14272. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14272 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ma KH, Hung HA, Svaren J (2016) Epigenomic regulation of Schwann cell reprogramming in peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 36:9135–9147. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1370-16.2016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Quintes S, Brinkmann BG, Ebert M et al (2016) Zeb2 is essential for Schwann cell differentiation, myelination and nerve repair. Nat Publ Group 19:1050–1059. doi: 10.1038/nn.4321 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wu LMN, Wang J, Conidi A et al (2016) Zeb2 recruits HDAC-NuRD to inhibit Notch and controls Schwann cell differentiation and remyelination. Nat Publ Group 19:1060–1072. doi: 10.1038/nn.4322 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kalluri R, Weinberg RA (2009) The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Investig 119:1420–1428. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Crawford AT, Desai D, Gokina P et al (2008) E-cadherin expression in postnatal Schwann cells is regulated by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase a pathway. Glia 56:1637–1647. doi: 10.1002/glia.20716 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ozçelik M, Cotter L, Jacob C et al (2010) Pals1 is a major regulator of the epithelial-like polarization and the extension of the myelin sheath in peripheral nerves. J Neurosci 30:4120–4131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-09.2010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Harrisingh MC, Nadales EP, Parkinson DB et al (2004) The Ras/Raf/ERK signalling pathway drives Schwann cell dedifferentiation. EMBO J 23:3061–3071. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600309 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ogata T, Iijima S, Hoshikawa S et al (2004) Opposing extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Akt pathways control Schwann cell myelination. J Neurosci 24:6724–6732. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5520-03.2004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sheu JY, Kulhanek DJ, Eckenstein FP (2000) Differential patterns of ERK and STAT3 phosphorylation after sciatic nerve transection in the rat. Exp Neurol 166:392–402. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7508 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Napoli I, Noon LA, Ribeiro S et al (2012) A central role for the ERK-signaling pathway in controlling schwann cell plasticity and peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 73:729–742. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Monje PV, Soto J, Bacallao K, Wood PM (2010) Schwann cell dedifferentiation is independent of mitogenic signaling and uncoupled to proliferation: role of cAMP and JNK in the maintenance of the differentiated state. J Biol Chem 285:31024–31036. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.116970 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Shin YK, Jang SY, Park JY et al (2013) The neuregulin-Rac-MKK7 pathway regulates antagonistic c-jun/Krox20 expression in Schwann cell dedifferentiation. Glia 61:892–904. doi: 10.1002/glia.22482 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Myers RR, Sekiguchi Y, Kikuchi S et al (2003) Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase activity enhances axonal regeneration. Exp Neurol 184:606–614. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00297-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yamazaki T, Sabit H, Oya T et al (2009) Activation of MAP kinases, Akt and PDGF receptors in injured peripheral nerves. J Peripher Nerv Syst 14:165–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2009.00228.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yang DP, Kim J, Syed N et al (2012) p38 MAPK activation promotes denervated Schwann cell phenotype and functions as a negative regulator of Schwann cell differentiation and myelination. J Neurosci 32:7158–7168. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5812-11.2012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zrouri H, Le Goascogne C, Li WW et al (2004) The role of MAP kinases in rapid gene induction after lesioning of the rat sciatic nerve. Eur J Neurosci 20:1811–1818. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03641.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Roberts SL, Dun X-P, Dee G et al (2016) The role of p38alpha in Schwann cells in regulating peripheral nerve myelination and repair. J Neurochem 6:109. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13929 Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Blom CL, Mårtensson LB, Dahlin LB (2014) Nerve injury-induced c-Jun activation in Schwann cells is JNK independent. Biomed Res Int 2014:392971-11. doi: 10.1155/2014/392971 Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gonzalez S, Fernando R, Berthelot J et al (2015) In vivo time-lapse imaging of mitochondria in healthy and diseased peripheral myelin sheath. Mitochondrion 23:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2015.05.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Guertin AD, Zhang DP, Mak KS et al (2005) Microanatomy of axon/glial signaling during Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci 25:3478–3487. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3766-04.2005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Birchmeier C, Bennett DLH (2016) Neuregulin/ErbB signaling in developmental myelin formation and nerve repair, 1st ed. Essays Dev Biol Part A 116:45–64. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tapinos N, Ohnishi M, Rambukkana A (2006) ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase signaling mediates early demyelination induced by leprosy bacilli. Nat Med 12:961–966. doi: 10.1038/nm1433 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Atanasoski S, Scherer SS, Sirkowski E et al (2006) ErbB2 signaling in Schwann cells is mostly dispensable for maintenance of myelinated peripheral nerves and proliferation of adult Schwann cells after injury. J Neurosci 26:2124–2131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4594-05.2006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INSERM U1051, Institut des Neurosciences de Montpellier (INM)Université de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Peripheral Neuropathy Research Center, Department of Physiology, College of MedicineDong-A UniversityBusanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations