Abstract
This paper shows the light effects and geometric alignments created by the sunlight passing through the stained glasses of the eastern rose window in Mallorca Cathedral and projecting on the inner side of the cathedral's main façade and on the cathedral's floor. As well as providing more accurate information about these already known light effects, this paper makes use of laser scanning techniques and astronomical and geographical concepts in order to graphically display other novel effects which occur in coincidence with certain religious festivities throughout the year.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Throughout history, many buildings have been designed to interact with several celestial objects. Archaeoastronomy is the branch of science which studies these interactions, particularly in constructions dedicated to religious worship. Several examples can be cited which show how the design of certain constructions integrates the movement of stars: For instance, Magli (2016) reveals that the megalithic enclosure of Gobekli Tepe, probably the most ancient in the world, was designed to visualize the orbit of Sirius through the structures' orientation. Also, Catamo and Lucarini (2002) and Sigismondi (2012) describe the gnomon built by Francesco Bianchini in the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels and of the Martyrs, which makes it possible to observe the meridian passage of the Sun and also of the stars Polaris, Arcturus and Sirius.
The star which has played the most relevant role in the history or architecture is the sun (Heilbron 1999; Torres 2000; Linares 2015). Due to its presence, both light and shade effects and solstice and equinox alignments have been incorporated into the design of buildings, as seen for example in some religious constructions in Petra (Belmonte, González–García and Polcaro 2013), the Older Parthenon in Athens (Hannah 2013), or several places of worship (Heilbron 1999; González-García and Belmonte 2015; Ali and Cunich 2001).
This paper describes the light effects created by the sunlight passing through the stained glass of a rose window in Mallorca Cathedral. While it is well established that master builders were knowledgeable in astronomy and applied this knowledge to their buildings (Incerti 2013), the purpose of this paper is not to claim or deny that the architects who designed Mallorca Cathedral did so with such light effects or alignments in their minds. Using graphical tools and theoretical concepts of astronomy, this paper tries to show and explain the sunlight effects and geometric alignments which occur in this cathedral and involve its two main rose windows.
Sunlight Effects in Mallorca Cathedral
It is well known, particularly in Mallorca, that every year on the same dates, and almost at the same time, the morning sunlight passes through the giant eastern rose window and projects on the inner side of the main façade right underneath the western rose window, thus forming the celebrated ‘Eight Effect’ or ‘Festival of Light’ (Ruiz and Pol 2010). This light effect occurs every 2nd of February (Candlemas Day) and every 11th of November (Saint Martin of Tours) (see Fig. 1). These dates are 40 days and 43 days off Christmas, respectively, and the positions of both projections differ slightly.
Also, in the days prior to the winter solstice, the sunlight passing through the eastern rose projects almost exactly on the western rose window, thus creating another light effect which can be seen from outside the cathedral (Fig. 2).
Even though these sunlight effects are widely known and appreciated by the visitors to the cathedral, their astronomical and geometric explanation is not commonly known. Therefore, for the purposes of research, the entire Mallorca cathedral has been digitalized and specific techniques were used in order to show the following time and geometric features, both mathematically and graphically, and make them common knowledge:
-
(a)
Accurate calculation of the moments in time when the projection of the eastern rose window is positioned underneath the western rose window on 2nd February and 11th November each year.
-
(b)
Accurate determination of the day and the moment in time when the projection of the eastern rose window comes closest to the center of the western rose window.
-
(c)
Daily path of the eastern rose window center projection on the inner side of the cathedral's main façade during certain religious festivities. Specifically: Epiphany (6th January), Candlemas (2nd February), All Saints' Day (1st November), All Souls Day (2nd November), St. Martin's Day (11th November), Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception (8th December), Winter Solstice Day (21st December) and Christmas Day (25th December). We have also considered the following traditional festivities in the island of Mallorca: St. Anthony (17th January) and St. Sebastian (20th January).
-
(d)
As a novelty, particular position of the eastern rose window's projection on the inner side of the cathedral's main façade on St. Luke's feast day (18th October) and St. Alexander's feast day (26th February).
Thus, in addition to providing more accurate information on light effects which are already widely known, this paper presents some novel effects created by the sunlight inside the Mallorca Cathedral (we consider these effects to be novel because they have been largely overlooked), as well as a graphical analysis of the eastern rose window projection during certain religious festivities throughout the year. All our results are graphically displayed (floor plan and elevation) on the basis of strict astronomical criteria, as described in the following section.
Methods
Digital Reconstruction of Mallorca Cathedral
In order to calculate and graphically represent our results, it was necessary to create a digital model of the cathedral. Using a RTC360 Leica scanner, we carried out a laser scanner survey with 1250 stations and determined a cloud made up by 21,000,000 points covering the cathedral close and the space under consideration (Fig. 3).
In order to have a better graphic control of results and incorporate the numerical calculations into the architectural drawings, some parts of the building were outlined with CAD on the basis of the abovementioned survey (Figs. 4 and 5).
After this graphical analysis, the following parameters were established:
-
Distance between the eastern rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and the inner side of the cathedral's western façade \(\sigma \): \(\mathcal{L}=75.954\;{\text{m}}\).
-
Height to the center \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) of the eastern rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and height to the center \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) of the western rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) with respect to the central nave's floor level: \({\mathcal{H}}_{\mathcal{L}}=35.313\;{\text{m}}\) and \({\mathcal{H}}_{\mathcal{P}}=34.715\;{\text{m}}\).
-
Distance between \({\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{L}}\), which is the orthogonal projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the wall \(\sigma \), and the vertical axis containing \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{P}}\): \(\mathcal{D}=0.141\;{\text{m}}\).
-
Amplitude of the angle formed between the inner side of the western façade and the equatorial plane in the direction of rotation north-east: \(\gamma =57.163^\circ \) sexagesimal degrees.
These parameters, together with the geographical location of the cathedral (latitude: \(39^\circ {34}^{\prime}{02}^{\prime\prime}.2N\), longitude: \(2^\circ 38^{\prime}54^{\prime\prime}.9E\)), are used to make the geometric calculations.
Astronomical and Geometric Explanation
The graphical results of this paper, presented in section "Results", are based on solving some astronomical and geometric problems. Assuming that the center \({\theta }_{E}\) of the earth is the center of the universe and also the center of a celestial sphere where the stars are, we need to: 1) determine the position \({\theta }_{S}\) of the center of the sun in the celestial sphere (apparent right ascension \({\alpha }_{app}\) and apparent declination \({\delta }_{app}\)) at every given instant \(JD\), 2) determine the time equation \({E}^{m}\) at the instant \(JD\), and 3) determine the intersection \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}=\sigma \cap {r}_{S}\) of plane \(\sigma \) with the straight line \({r}_{S}\) passing through \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and having the direction of vector \(\overrightarrow{{\theta }_{E}{\theta }_{S}}\). Readers may turn to Martín (1990) and Meeus (1991) to learn in detail the definitions of the celestial positions, the time equation and all the concepts mentioned in this section.
In order to solve these problems, we use the well-known algorithms mentioned in Martín (1990) and Meeus (1991). The initial variable in these three problems is a calendar date.
Thus, we start from an initial variable date: year \(a\), month \(m\in {\mathbb{z}}\cap (\mathrm{1,12})\), day of the month \(d\), hour \(h\), minute \(m\), second \(s\), in Greenwich Civil Time, i.e., \(GMT+{12}^{h}\). Please note that in Mallorca, due to the delays and advancements imposed by the Spanish Government, we must consider the Greenwich Civil Time plus 1 hour in Autumn-Winter or plus 2 hours in Spring-Summer.
Next, the date is converted to Julian Date \(JD\). Readers may turn to Martín (1990) and Meeus (1991) for definitions and calculations of: CE Gregorian year (from 14th October 1582 onwards), CE and BCE Julian year (until 4th October 1582), and Julian Day \(JD\,(\# )\) according to the time measurement system proposed by Joseph Scaliger.
Meeus (1991) provides the following algorithm to calculate \(JD\) when \(JD>0\): Let \(D=d+\frac{h}{24}+\frac{m}{1440}+\frac{s}{86400}\). If \(m>2\), \(a\) and \(m\) remain unchanged. If \(m\le 2\), \(a\) is replaced by \(a-1\) and \(m\) is replaced by \(m+12\). Thus, if \(JD>0\), in CE Gregorian year we have that \(JD = \left\lfloor {365.25\left( {a + 4716} \right)} \right\rfloor + \left\lfloor {30.6001\left( {m + 1} \right)} \right\rfloor + 2 - \left\lfloor {\left( \frac{a}{100} \right)} \right\rfloor + \left\lfloor {\frac{{\left\lfloor \frac{a}{100} \right\rfloor }}{4}} \right\rfloor + D - 1524.5\), and in CE Julian year we have that \(JD=\lfloor 365.25({\text{a}}+4716)\rfloor +\lfloor 30.6001({\text{m}}+1)\rfloor +{\text{D}}-1524.5\), where \(\lfloor {\text{x}}\rfloor ={\text{max}}\{{\text{k}}\in {\mathbb{z}}\mathrm{ with k}\le {\text{x}}\}\).
Calculating the Position of the Sun in the Celestial Sphere
Now that we know \(JD\), we can calculate \({\delta }_{app}\), which is the apparent declination of the Sun in the celestial sphere. We will use the algorithms in Meeus (1991) with an error of \(0.01^{\prime\prime}\) sexagesimal seconds. Even though we do not need such level of accuracy for our purposes, we follow the steps and calculate the following astronomical variables:
-
(a)
\(T\), the time in Julian centuries of 36525 ephemeris days, measured from the Julian epoch \(J2000.00\), which corresponds to the date 2000 January 1.5 in Dynamical Time \(DT\): \(T=\frac{JD-2451545.00}{36525}\).
-
(b)
\(L_{0}\), geometric mean longitude of the Sun referred to the mean equinox of date T: \(L_{0} = 280^\circ .46646 + 36000^\circ .76983T + 0^\circ .0003032T^{2}\).
-
(c)
\(M\), the mean anomaly of the Sun:\(M = 357^\circ .52911 + 35999^\circ .05029T - 0^\circ .0001537T^{2}\).
-
(d)
\(e\), the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit:\(e = 0.016708634 - 0.000042037T - 0.0000001267T^{2}\).
-
(e)
\(C\), the equation of the Center of the Sun:\(C = \left( {1^\circ .914602 - 0^\circ .004817T - 0^\circ .000014T^{2} } \right)\sin M + \left( {0^\circ .019993 - 0^\circ .000101T} \right)\sin \left( {2M} \right) + 0^\circ .000289\sin \left( {3M} \right)\).
-
(f)
\(\odot\) , the true geometric longitude of the Sun referred to the mean equinox of date T:\(\odot = L_{0} + C\).
-
(g)
\(\Omega =125^\circ .04452-1934^\circ .136621T\).
-
(h)
\(\lambda \), the apparent longitude of the Sun referred to the true equinox of date T, correcting for nutation and aberration: \(\lambda = \odot - 0^\circ .00569 - 0^\circ .00478\sin \Omega\).
-
(i)
\(\varepsilon_{0}\), the mean obliquity of the ecliptic: \(\varepsilon_{0} = 23^\circ 26^{\prime}21^{\prime\prime}.448 - 46^{\prime\prime}.8150T - 0^{\prime\prime}.00059T^{2} + 0^{\prime\prime}.001813T^{3}\).
-
(j)
\(L^{\prime}\) , the mean longitude of the Moon: \(L^{\prime} = 218^\circ .3165 + 481267^\circ .8813T\).
-
(k)
\(\Delta \varepsilon \), the nutation in obliquity of the ecliptic: \(\Delta \varepsilon = 9^{\prime\prime}.20\cos \Omega + 0^{\prime\prime}.57\cos \left( {2L_{0} } \right) + 0^{\prime\prime}.10\cos \left( {2L^{\prime}} \right) - 0^{\prime\prime}.09\cos \left( {2\Omega } \right)\).
-
(l)
\(\varepsilon \), the true obliquity of the ecliptic: \(\varepsilon = \varepsilon_{0} + \Delta \varepsilon\).
-
(m)
\({\delta }_{app}\), the apparent declination of the Sun: \(\delta_{app} = \sin^{ - 1} \left( {\sin \varepsilon \sin \lambda } \right)\) , calculated in sexagesimal degrees.
Calculating the Time Equation
Next, given the date \(JD\), we proceed to calculate the time equation \({E}^{m}\). Again, we use the algorithms provided in Meeus (1991) to calculate the following astronomical variables:
-
(a)
The sum of the mean value of the aberration in longitude and the correction for reduction to the FK5 system: \(0^\circ .0057183=-20^{\prime \prime}.49552-0^{\prime \prime}.09033\).
-
(b)
\(\Delta \psi \), the nutation in longitude of the ecliptic: \(\Delta \psi = - 17^{\prime\prime}.20\sin \Omega - 1^{\prime\prime}.32\sin \left( {2L_{0} } \right) - 0^{\prime\prime}.23\sin \left( {2L^{\prime}} \right) + 0^{\prime\prime}.21\sin \left( {2\Omega } \right)\).
-
(c)
\({\alpha }_{app}\), the apparent right ascension of the Sun taking into account the aberration and the nutation: \({\alpha }_{app}={{{\text{tan}}}^{-1}\left(\frac{{\text{cos}}\varepsilon {\text{sin}}\lambda }{{\text{cos}}\lambda }\right)}_{2}\), calculated in sexagesimal degrees.
-
(d)
If \({\alpha }_{app}<0\), then: \(A_{app} = \left( {\frac{{\alpha_{app} }}{360} - \left\lfloor {\frac{{\alpha_{app} }}{360}} \right\rfloor - 1} \right)*360 + 360\).
-
(e)
If \({\alpha }_{app}\ge 0\), then: \(A_{app} = A_{app} = \left( {\frac{{\alpha_{app} }}{360} - \left\lfloor {\frac{{\alpha_{app} }}{360}} \right\rfloor } \right) * 360\).
-
(f)
If \(L_{0} < 0\), then: \(l_{0} = \left( {\frac{{L_{0} }}{360} - \left\lfloor {\frac{{L_{0} }}{360}} \right\rfloor - 1} \right)*360 + 360\).
-
(g)
If \(\alpha_{app} \ge 0\), then: \(l_{0} = \left( {\frac{{L_{0} }}{360} - \left\lfloor {\frac{{L_{0} }}{360}} \right\rfloor } \right)*360\).
-
(h)
\(E\), the time equation: \(E = l_{0} - 0^\circ .0057183 - A_{app} + \Delta \psi \cos \varepsilon\), calculated in sexagesimal degrees.
-
(i)
\({E}^{m}\), the time equation: \({E}^{m}=4E\), calculated in minutes of time. We know that \(\left|{E}^{m}\right|<{20}^{m}\), i.e., the equation of time is always less than 20 minutes in absolute value. Therefore, if the calculation of \(\left|{E}^{m}\right|\) renders a value larger than 20, then we will add or substract a convenient multiple of \({24}^{h}\).
Since \({\alpha }_{app}\) is in the same quadrant as \(\lambda \), the function \({{{\text{tan}}}^{-1}\left(\frac{A}{B}\right)}_{2}\) is defined in a particular manner which the reader may find in Meeus (1991).
Calculating the Geometric Projection
Having calculated \({\delta }_{app}\) and \({E}^{m}\) based on \(JD\), the required parameters are gathered from subsection "Digital reconstruction of Mallorca Cathedral" in order to carry out the solar projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the plane \(\sigma \) and determine the point \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\). Cartesian orthonormal reference system \(\left\{\theta ;{\overrightarrow{e}}_{1},{\overrightarrow{e}}_{2},{\overrightarrow{e}}_{3}\right\}\) is used, such that a) if points in space have coordinates (x, y, z), then the equation of plane \(\sigma \) is x=0, b) \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{3}\) has direction towards the zenith, c) \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{1}\) has direction towards \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\), d) \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{2}\) is such that the base \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{1},{\overrightarrow{e}}_{2},{\overrightarrow{e}}_{3}\) is clockwise (i.e., if \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{1}\) pointed south, \({\overrightarrow{e}}_{2}\) would point west), and e) (0,0,0) are the coordinates of \({\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{L}}\), which is the orthogonal projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on \(\sigma \). Using the algorithms described in Martín (1990) and Meeus (1991), the following geometric parameters are calculated in order to determine \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\).
-
(a)
\({h}_{S}\), solar time. Taking into account the time equation \({E}^{m}\) and the geographical longitude of the cathedral \(lon=2^\circ 38^{\prime}54^{\prime\prime}.9E=- 2^\circ . 785833\), we determine the solar time in Mallorca: \({h}_{S}=h+\frac{m}{60}+\frac{s}{360 }-\frac{24}{360}*lon+\frac{{E}^{m}}{60}\).
-
(b)
\(\beta =90-lat\), where the geographical latitude of the cathedral is \(lat=39^\circ {34}^{\prime}{02}^{{\prime}{\prime}}.2N=39^\circ . 572777\).
-
(c)
\(H=360\frac{{h}_{S}-12}{24}\).
-
(d)
\(Azimuth={{\text{tan}}}^{-1}\left(\frac{{\text{sin}}H}{{\text{cos}}\left(H\right){\text{cos}}\beta -{\text{tan}}\left({\delta }_{app}\right){\text{sin}}\beta }\right)\).
-
(e)
\(Height={{\text{sin}}}^{-1}\left({\text{sin}}\beta {\text{cos}}\left({\delta }_{app}\right){\text{cos}}H+{\text{cos}}\beta {\text{sin}}\left({\delta }_{app}\right)\right)\).
-
(f)
\(\mu =\frac{-{x}_{0}}{\left({\text{cos}}\left(Azimuth\right){\text{cos}}\gamma +{\text{sin}}\left(Azimuth\right){\text{sin}}\gamma \right){\text{cos}}\left(Height\right)}\), where \({x}_{0}=75.954\).
-
(g)
\({y}_{1}=\mu \left(-{\text{cos}}\left(Height\right){\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Azimut}h\right){\text{sin}}\gamma +{\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Heig}ht\right){\text{sin}}\left(Azimuth\right){\text{cos}}\gamma \right)\).
-
(h)
\({z}_{1}=\mu {\text{sin}}\left(Height\right)\).
After the above steps, the coordinates of the projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) are determined. Such coordinates are: \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}=\left(0,{y}_{1},{z}_{1}\right)\). The variation of this projection \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\) over time results in paths \({\mathcal{T}}_{i/j}\) on the plane \(\sigma \). These paths are graphically described below.
Similarly, the intersection \({q}_{\mathcal{L}}=\rho \cap {r}_{S}\) is determined. This is the intersection of plane \(\rho \), which is the floor plane, and the straight line \({r}_{S}\) passing through \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and having the direction of vector \(\overrightarrow{{\theta }_{E}{\theta }_{S}}\). In order to do that, the last three steps above f), g), h) are modified as follows:
-
(1)
\(\mu =\frac{-35.313}{{\text{sin}}\left(Height\right)}\).
-
(2)
\({x}_{1}={x}_{0}+\mu \left({\text{cos}}\left(Height\right){\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Azimut}h\right){\text{cos}}\gamma +{\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Heig}ht\right){\text{sin}}\left(Azimuth\right){\text{sin}}\gamma \right)\).
-
(3)
\({y}_{1}=\mu \left(-{\text{cos}}\left(Height\right){\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Azimut}h\right){\text{sin}}\gamma +{\text{cos}}\left(\mathit{Heig}ht\right){\text{sin}}\left(Azimuth\right){\text{cos}}\gamma \right)\).
After the above steps, the coordinates of the projection \({q}_{\mathcal{L}}\) of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the floor plane \(\rho \) are determined. Such coordinates are: \({q}_{\mathcal{L}}=\left({x}_{1},{y}_{1},-35.313\right)\). The variation of this projection \({q}_{\mathcal{L}}\) over time results in paths \({\mathcal{L}}_{i/j}\) on the plane \(\rho \). These paths are graphically described below.
Results
Using the abovementioned astronomical and geometric algorithms (which were programmed in C++ by the authors for better numeric accuracy), the points \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\) are obtained which describe the daily paths \({\mathcal{T}}_{i/j}\) generated by the projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the plane \(\sigma \); and the points \({q}_{\mathcal{L}}\) are obtained which describe the daily paths \({\mathcal{L}}_{i/j}\) generated by the projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the cathedral’s floor plane \(\rho \). These daily paths \({\mathcal{T}}_{i/j}\), corresponding to the dates listed in Table 1, are graphically represented in Figs. 6, 7 and 8; and the daily paths \({\mathcal{L}}_{i/j}\) are graphically represented in Fig. 9.
Besides, in order to provide the reader with more information, the previous Fig. 6, 7 and 8 show (in orange and left to right) the analemmas for 7.00 am, 8.00 am and 9.00 am in Greenwich Civil Time. Figure 9 below shows (in orange) the analemmas for 8.00 am, 9.00 am and 10.00 am in Greenwich Civil Time.
Conclusion
The following considerations can be made about the light effects which are graphically displayed in section "Results".
Considerations about the commonly known sunlight effects:
-
(a)
On the 11th of November (St. Martin of Tours) at 8.33 am \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) is projected on the vertical straight line passing through the center of \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\); the distance between \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) is 13.05 meters. Similarly, on the 2nd of February (Candlemas Day) at 9.03 am \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) is projected on the vertical straight line passing through the center of \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\); the distance between \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) is 14.19 m. Thus, the ‘Eight Effect’ is more clearly visible on St. Martin's Day (cf. Fig. 6).
-
(b)
On 2nd February at 9.03 am the projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the plane \(\sigma \) is exactly at half the distance between the cathedral's floor level and the height of the topmost point in the edge of the rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) (cf. Fig. 6). This middle point lies at a height of 20.61 meters.
-
(c)
The paths \({\mathcal{T}}_{21/12}\), \({\mathcal{T}}_{25/12}\), \({\mathcal{T}}_{8/12}\) and \({\mathcal{T}}_{6/1}\) cross the stained glasses of the western rose window between 8.00 am and 8.30 am. Due to this, the sun rays passing through \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) are projected onto \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\), illuminating it from the inside of the cathedral. This effect is strongest on Winter Solstice Day at 8:17 am, when the distance between \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) and the path \({\mathcal{T}}_{21/12}\) is the shortest (1.31 meters) (cf. Figs. 7 and 8).
Considerations about other sunlight effects which are not commonly known:
-
(d)
On the 1st and 2nd of November at 8.45 am \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) is projected onto the ornamental element located on top of the frieze which crowns the main entrance porch to the cathedral. The mean distance between both projections \({p}_{\mathcal{L}}\) and this element is 0.89 meters (cf. Fig. 8).
-
(e)
On 17th January and on 20th January at 9.03 am the projection of \({\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the plane \(\sigma \) is positioned exactly at two thirds of the distance between the cathedral's floor level and the height of the topmost point in the edge of the rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{P}}\) (cf. Fig. 8). This position lies at a height of 27.48 meters.
-
(f)
As shown in figure 8, on the 18th of October at 10.03 am and on the 26th of February at 9.31 am the rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) is projected exactly onto the access door to the cathedral. On 18th October, this projection is even tangent to the horizontal plane of the cathedral.
With regard to the projections of the eastern rose window \({\mathcal{R}}_{\mathcal{L}}\) on the cathedral's floor plane \(\rho \), no significant relationship can be observed between the solar paths and the architectural elements. However, it should be noted that between March and June, the projection of this rose window illuminates a larger area of pavement than during the rest of the year.
In summary, this paper makes use of laser scanning techniques and astronomical and geometric concepts in order to graphically display the light effects and alignments (both known and unknown) which occur when the sunlight passes through the stained glasses of the eastern rose window in Mallorca Cathedral and projects this rose window on the inner side of the cathedral's main façade.
References
Ali, Jason, and Peter Cunich. 2001. The Orientation of Churches: Some New Evidence. Antiquaries Journal 81: 155-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581500072188
Belmonte, Juan Antonio, César González–García and Andrea Polcaro. 2013. Light and Shadows over Petra: Astronomy and Landscape in Nabataean Lands. Nexus Network Journal 15: 487-501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-013-0164-6.
Catamo, Mario and Cesare Lucarini. 2002. Il cielo in Basilica. La Meridiana della Basilica di Santa Maria degli Angeli e dei Martiri in Roma. Roma: Edizioni AGAMI.
González-García, César and Juan Antonio Belmonte. 2015. The Orientation of Pre-Romanesque Churches in the Iberian Peninsula. Nexus Network Journal 17: 353-377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-014-0231-7.
Hannah, R. 2013. Greek Temple Orientation: The Case of the Older Parthenon in Athens. Nexus Network Journal 15: 423-443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-013-0169-1.
Heilbron, John Lewis. 1999. The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Incerti, M. 2013. Astronomical Knowledge in the Sacred Architecture of the Middle Ages in Italy. Nexus Network Journal 15: 503-526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-013-0167-3.
Linares, O. 2015. Precisiones sobre la luz en el Pantheon de Roma. VLC arquitectura 2(1): 33-55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2015.3376.
Magli, G. 2016. Sirius and the project of the megalithic enclosures at Gobekli Tepe. Nexus Network Journal 18: 337-346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-015-0277-1.
Martín, F. 1990. Astronomía. Madrid: Parainfo.
Meeus, J. 1991. Astronomical Algorithms. Richmond: Willmann-Bell, Inc.
Ruiz, Daniel and Josep-Lluís Pol. 2010. Els esfectes de la llum solar a la seu de Mallorca. Actes d’història de la ciencia i de la técnica, Nova Època, 3(1): 37-47.
Sigismondi, C. 2012. Measuring the position of the center of the Sun at the Clementine Gnomon of Santa Maria degli Angeli in Rome. Journal for Occultation Astronomy 1: 20-23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.0510.
Torres, Elías. 2000. Luz cenital. Barcelona: Editorial Col·legi Oficial d’Arquitectes de Catalunya.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Samper, A., Moreno-García, D. & Herrera, B. Study of the Effects Created by the Sunlight Passing Through the Rose Windows of Mallorca Cathedral. Nexus Netw J 26, 469–483 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00760-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00760-x