Skip to main content
Log in

Australian experience with herbicide tolerant (HT) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton

  • CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS "DECISION MAKING AND SCIENCE"
  • Published:
Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Australia’s nationally consistent framework for gene technology regulation is underpinned by the Gene Technology Act 2000, administered by an independent decision-maker, the Gene Technology Regulator. The object of the Act is “to protect the health and safety of people, and to protect the environment, by identifying risks posed by or as a result of gene technology, and by managing those risks through regulating certain dealings with genetically modified organisms”. Marketing and trade impacts are outside the scope of assessments required by the Act. Since 2001, seven licences have been issued for the commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) cotton with insect resistance and/or herbicide tolerance. Licences have also been issued for 32 GM cotton field trials with a broader range of traits. The decisions to grant licences for the environmental release of GM cottons require the preparation of Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plans (RARMPs) which apply the Regulator’s Risk Analysis Framework, based on internationally recognised standards and incorporating risk assessment, risk management and risk communication. In addition, licences for commercial release carry provisions for targeted surveillance if specific factors are identified in the risk assessment. More than 90 % of the Australian cotton crop is now planted with GM cotton varieties. No adverse effects to the health of people or the environment have been reported to date and no conditions for specific surveillance invoked. Information on the Australian regulatory system for gene technology, the Risk Analysis Framework, RARMPs and licences, is publicly available on the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator website at www.ogtr.gov.au.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APVMA:

Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority

Bt:

Bacillus thuringiensis

FSANZ:

Food Standards Australia and New Zealand

GM:

Genetically modified

GMOs:

Genetically modified organisms

GTR:

Gene Technology Regulator

HT:

Herbicide tolerance

OGTR:

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator

PRR:

Post release review

References

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission (2003) Working principles for risk analysis for application in the framework of the Codex Alimentarius. In: Codex Alimentarius Commission Procedural Manual, 13 edn. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/10007/CXG_044e.pdf

  • Eastick R, Hearnden M (2006) Potential for Weediness of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in Northern Australia. Weed Sci 54:1142–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OGTR (2002) Risk assessment and risk management plan for DIR 012/2002—Commercial release of Bollgard II® cotton. Document prepared by Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/

  • OGTR (2006) Risk assessment and risk management plan for DIR 066/2006—Commercial release of GM herbicide tolerant and/or insect resistant cotton. Document prepared by Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/

  • OGTR (2008) The biology of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium barbadense L. (cotton). Document prepared by Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/

  • OGTR (2009) Risk analysis framework. Document prepared by Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra. http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/riskassessments-1

  • OIE (2004) Handbook on import risk analysis for animals and animal products: introduction and qualitative risk analysis, Report No. 1. Office International des Epizooties (World Organisation for Animal Health), Paris

  • Standards Australia (2004) AS/NZS 4360:2004 risk management. Standards Australia International and Standards New Zealand, Sydney and Wellington

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author J. Smith declares that he has no conflict of interest and that the work reported in the paper reflects the experiences of the Australian Government Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Smith.

Additional information

Conference Proceedings: “Decision Making and Science—The Balancing of Risk Based Decisions that Influence Sustainability of Agricultural Production”, 7th and 8th October 2010 in Berlin, Germany. Sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, J. Australian experience with herbicide tolerant (HT) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 6 (Suppl 1), 99–104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0681-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0681-8

Keywords

Navigation