Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to ascertain the feasibility of crowdsourcing via Facebook for medical research purposes; by investigating surgical, oncological and functional outcome and quality-of-life (QOL) in patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) enrolled in a Facebook community (1112 members).
Methods
Patients completed online open surveys on demographics, surgery and clinical outcomes (group 1); and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including knee-injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), hip-disability osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) and SF-36 (group 2). Mean follow-up was 70 months (12–374). Consistency checks were performed with Cohen’s kappa statistic for intra-rater agreement.
Results
The first survey was completed by 272 patients (group 1) and 72 patients completed the second (group 2). In group 1, recurrence-rate was 58 % (69/118) after arthroscopic, 36 % (35/97) after open and 50 % (5/10) after combined synovectomy (p = 0.003). In group 2, recurrence-rate was 67 % (26/39) after arthroscopic and 51 % (17/33) after open synovectomy (p = 0.19). Recurrence-risk was increased for diffuse disease (OR = 16; 95%CI = 3.2–85; p < 0.001). Mean function and QOL did not differ after arthroscopic or open synovectomy: KOOS 49 vs. 58 (p = 0.24), HOOS 62 vs. 53 (p = 0.56), TESS 78 vs. 82 (p = 0.86), SF-36 61 vs. 66 (p = 0.41). Cohen’s kappa statistic for intra-rater agreement was good to outstanding (κ = 0.68–0.95; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Local recurrence-risk was higher for diffuse-type disease and arthroscopic synovectomy. Functional outcome and QOL were comparable for both types of surgery. Gathering data via crowdsourcing seems a promising and innovative way of evaluating rare diseases including PVNS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a rare benign but locally aggressive giant cell tumour deriving from synovium, either localized giant cell tumour of tendon sheath (GCT-TS) or diffuse-type giant cell tumour (Dt-GCT) [1, 2]. It is most commonly found in the knee (75 %; Fig. 1) and hip (15 %) [1, 3]. Treatment may consist of arthroscopic or open synovectomy, intra-articular radioactive colloids, radiation therapy or systemic targeted therapy [4, 5].
Rare diseases, including PVNS, are difficult to investigate as published case series are generally small, of retrospective nature and often describe research periods of several decades with a short follow-up duration. Therefore, these studies only provide levels of evidence III-IV, and clear evidence is lacking as meta-analysis of gathered data is often not warranted.
With a growing number of patients using social media as a source of medical information, online patient platforms can also be used as a powerful educational tool. Gathering patient data via crowdsourcing on social media can be especially promising and useful in the evaluation of rare diseases, as large study populations may become easily available to researchers. Crowdsourcing is the practice of obtaining services, ideas or content by collecting contributions from a large group of people from an online community rather than from traditional data suppliers. This is already increasingly being used for meeting the needs of consumers, and we wanted to investigate if it could be used to evaluate patient satisfaction, functional outcome and quality of life for patients with PVNS. Crowdsourcing to obtain big data can be useful in all fields of medicine, especially regarding the evaluation of rare diseases and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Open online surveys may also be more attractive and quick to complete for the modern patient than conventional questionnaires on paper via regular mail.
Several small communities of patients with PVNS exist on Facebook; however, there is only one community with over 1100 patients at the time of study (>2000 at the time of writing). On this forum, patients share information on their disease, experiences with treating physicians, surgery or other treatments and clinical outcome, and seek support from fellow patients. From this forum, we learned that adequate patient information on PVNS is deficient and that there is a desire among patients to interact with other patients and professionals and a growing demand for taking part in scientific research projects on PVNS. This is also reflected by recent initiatives such as PatientsLikeMe (www.patientslikeme.com), in which patients can track their outcomes by sharing their data and by participating in the design and implementation of patient-centred trials [6, 7]. Such online patient communities may allow researchers rapid access to large study populations that are otherwise hard to assemble in rare diseases.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether we could use crowdsourcing via Facebook and online surveys for medical research purposes on PVNS. More specifically, we set out to correlate functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) to patient characteristics, surgical procedures and oncological outcome in patients with PVNS who were enrolled in a patient community on Facebook.
Materials and methods
In this open survey observational study, patients were recruited to complete questionnaires on their disease through a patient-initiated campaign on a PVNS patient community on Facebook (1112 members at time of consulting; https://www.facebook.com/groups/91851410592/?ref=ts&fref=ts). A first online survey on demographics, clinical presentation, findings on imaging and biopsy material, type and localization of disease, surgical and adjuvant treatment, local recurrences, post-operative complications, functional outcome, quality of life (QOL) and follow-up was open from December 2012 to April 2014 (group 1). A second online survey using standardized and validated questionnaires on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [8], to evaluate functional outcome and QOL, was open from August 2013 to February 2014 (group 2). The latter included range of motion (ROM), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) [9, 10], hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) [11], Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) [12] and short form-36 health survey (SF-36) [13]. Mean follow-up after index surgery was 70 months (range 12–374). The surveys were developed via SurveyMonkey® (https://www.surveymonkey.com) and usability and technical functionality were tested by the researchers. The surveys were announced on the Facebook community wall with a first notice of the study, and repeated requests for compilation after one, two, five, six and ten months. It was a voluntary survey and no incentives were offered. All responses were anonymous and automatically captured into an SPSS 20.0 file, which was password protected and only accessible to the researchers. Completeness checks were performed through JAVAScript and only fully completed surveys were included in the analysis. Respondents were able to review and change their answers before submitting. Unique site visitors were determined by IP addresses, and in case of duplicate entries only the most recent ones were included in the analysis. Propensity scores to adjust for a non-representative sample were not used in this study, but results were compared with previous results from the literature. The checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) was used (Appendix 1) [14, 15]. None of the patients were recalled for this study. In the present study, data were not verified by contacting treating physicians or patients. By completing the surveys, patients gave their informed consent for this study. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Dutch law (Medical Research involving Human Subjects Act) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Statistical analysis
Differences in dichotomous data were calculated with Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests and in numerical data with Mann–Whitney U tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors of influence on recurrence, including diffuse or localized disease, localization and type of surgery. To determine whether the results of this study are reliable, we performed consistency tests by evaluating intra-rater agreement for patients’ answers between both online surveys. We used Cohen’s kappa statistic to perform consistency checks by determining intra-rater agreement for patients that could be cross-linked by IP address in the two online surveys. Outstanding agreement was defined as κ > 0.80; substantial agreement as κ = 0.60–0.79; moderate agreement as κ = 0.40–0.59; and poor agreement as κ < 0.40 [16]. Data from the two surveys were not combined but analysed separately; hence, the occurrence of repeated measures was not accounted for. We used SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Armonk, NJ, USA) for statistical analyses. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
All 1112 members of the PVNS patient community on Facebook, at the time of consulting, could view the online open survey. Participation rate was 26.3 % (293/1112) in the first survey; and 11.8 % (131/1112) for SF-36, 5.3 % (59/1112) for KOOS, 0.8 % (9/1112) for HOOS and 3.1 % (34/1112) for TESS in the second survey. Completion rate was 92.8 % (272/293) in the first survey; and 84.7 % (111/131) for SF-36, 86.4 % (51/59) for KOOS, 100 % (9/9) for KOOS and 100 % (34/34) for TESS in the second survey.
From group 1, 272 patients were included (Table 1). They originated from 23 countries and underwent arthroscopic or open synovectomy between 1982 and 2012. Primary surgery was arthroscopic synovectomy (n = 118), open synovectomy (n = 97), combined arthroscopic and open synovectomy (hybrid synovectomy; n = 10) or unknown (n = 47). One hundred twenty two patients reported at least one local recurrence, 124 patients had no recurrences (Table 2). Mean number of surgeries was 2.6 (1–9). Final surgery was open synovectomy (n = 52), arthroscopic synovectomy (n = 36), hybrid synovectomy (n = 10) or unknown (n = 24). Total hip arthroplasty was required in 13/25 and total knee arthroplasty in 17/199 (p < 0.001). Adjuvant treatment was radiation therapy (n = 30), radioactive colloid instillation with 90Yttrium (n = 18), M-CSFR targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (n = 8) or nilotinib (n = 2), cryosurgery (n = 3) or methotrexate (n = 1).
From group 2, 72 patients with PVNS in the knee or hip joint and a minimum follow-up of one year were included (Table 1). The knee was affected in 64 patients (52 diffuse; 12 localized) and the hip in eight (six diffuse; two localized). Other localizations (n = 18; e.g. ankle, elbow and shoulder) were excluded from PROMs analyses, as we wanted to focus on the two most common localizations; however, they were used for consistency checks between both surveys. Primary surgery was arthroscopic synovectomy (n = 38) or open synovectomy (n = 34). Recurrence rates are listed in Table 2. Mean number of surgeries was 2.5 (1–9). Recurrences were treated with open synovectomy (n = 16), arthroscopic synovectomy (n = 15) or complete resection and joint arthroplasty (n = 12). Total hip arthroplasty was required in 6/8 and total knee arthroplasty in 7/64 (p = 0.004). Adjuvant treatment was radiation therapy (n = 12), 90Yttrium (n = 9), imatinib (n = 1) or nilotinib (n = 1). Diffuse disease increased recurrence risk (odds ratio [OR] = 16; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 3.2–85; p = 0.001; Table 3). Mean functional and QOL results did not differ significantly after primary arthroscopic or open synovectomy (Table 4). Final surgery resulted in a mean TESS of 88 after arthroscopic synovectomy, 68 after open synovectomy and 69 after total joint arthroplasty (p = 0.017). Joint replacement surgery resulted in lower functional scores compared with joint salvage: TESS 69 vs. 82 (p = 0.010), KOOS 34 vs. 55 (p = 0.031) and SF-36 49 vs. 66 (p = 0.020). Mean ROM was lower for patients with diffuse disease (117 vs. 151 degrees; p = 0.024) and for recurrent disease requiring repeat surgery (113 vs. 138 degrees; p = 0.046).
Consistency checks were performed with Cohen’s kappa statistic for intra-rater agreement; 66 patients could be cross-linked between both surveys through IP address. Cohen’s kappa statistic for the two online surveys was outstanding for tumour localization with κ = 0.95 (p < 0.001), joint arthroplasty with κ = 0.88 (p < 0.001) and adjuvant treatment with κ = 0.82 (p < 0.001); and substantial for primary surgical treatment with κ = 0.78 (p < 0.001) and recurrences with κ = 0.68 (p < 0.001).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated whether we could use crowdsourcing via Facebook and online surveys for medical research purposes on PVNS. We set out to correlate functional outcome and QOL to patient characteristics, surgical procedures and oncological outcome in patients with PVNS who were enrolled in a patient community on Facebook. We concluded that the recurrence risk was highest for diffuse disease and after arthroscopic synovectomy. Lower functional results were reported for patients with diffuse disease, for patients with recurrences requiring repeat surgery, and for patients eventually requiring joint replacement surgery.
To determine whether the results of this study are reliable and whether crowdsourcing via social media is feasible in medical research, we performed consistency tests by evaluating intra-rater agreement for patients’ answers between both online surveys, which was substantial to outstanding for most study variables. The somewhat lower agreement in follow-up questions can be explained by the time interval between the two surveys as patients may have experienced a recurrence after filling out the first survey. In addition, we compared our results with previous publications on PVNS to assess the representativeness of our sampling frame [17] (Tables 3 and 5). An advantage of this comparison may be the determination of accurateness of the use of crowdsourcing and the reliability of the obtained data. Possible disadvantages of crowdsourcing may include selection bias through the sampling method, inhibiting comparison of results with previously published reports. The average age of 32 years at onset of disease in this study matches known epidemiology of PVNS (<40 years) [1, 2, 36]. Localization of PVNS in this study (73 % knee, 9 % hip, 18 % other) was also comparable to percentages described in literature (75 % knee, 15 % hip, 10 % other). Multifocal PVNS is rare and was not reported in this study [36]. Women were over-represented (78 %) when compared with known epidemiology of PVNS; possibly indicating that women are more likely to be on Facebook and to seek information via support groups [37]. All study variables were distributed equally between men and women. Women scored somewhat lower on SF-36 subdomains physical functioning, pain and PCS; all other functional and QOL scores did not differ between men and women (results not shown). Proportions of arthroscopic and open synovectomy [4] and total knee or hip arthroplasty were comparable to those previously published [38, 39].
Mean follow-up of approximately six years (range 1–31) was longer when compared with the majority of previously published reports [3, 19, 23, 29, 31, 32]. Together with the relatively high recurrence rates in this study (58–77 % after arthroscopic and 36–64 % after open synovectomy), this may indicate that to date, an underestimate of the true local recurrence rate of PVNS has been published.
Functional results after surgical treatment for PVNS have been reported (Table 5) [3, 18–32], but comparison is difficult, as functional results were not specified for diffuse and localized disease, type of surgery, primary or recurrent disease and different localizations. In this study, there was no difference in functional outcome and QOL between patients who underwent primary arthroscopic or open synovectomy. However, the long course of disease and the need for multiple surgeries has previously been reported to result in worse functional results in a large number of patients [23]; and in this study, lower functional results were also reported for patients with diffuse disease, with recurrences requiring repeat surgery, and for patients eventually requiring joint replacement surgery.
Our study has several limitations. First, the low participation rate in this study (26.3 %) may be explained by several arguments, including the voluntary character of the survey, and the attention paid to the survey by the Facebook members; maybe they didn’t see the requests on their wall, didn’t have time to compile the questionnaires or didn’t feel the need to add to a scientific research project. This is also of concern when similar studies involving social media are performed in medicine, as it may induce selection bias. In regards to this potential selection bias, patients who are currently unsatisfied with their situation may be more likely to enrol in a patient community on Facebook and to complete online surveys concerning functional and QOL results. However, the opposite may also be true for satisfied patients who are willing to share their experience and to improve awareness on this rare disease. Second, patients were not uniformly diagnosed and treated for PVNS, as they were collected from 23 different countries and treated by various surgeons without distinguishing between peripheral and tertiary referral centres. However, we believe that it represents a randomly chosen group of patients, perfectly reflecting the current worldwide situation and underlining the importance of centralization of care for musculoskeletal tumours [40]. Third, the accuracy of surgical data is subjective to the understanding of patients; data obtained from patients were not verified by contacting treating physicians. We considered this beyond the scope of the current study but we deem it valuable in future crowdsourcing studies via social media. Yet, PROMs are considered more reliable in reporting subjective patient outcomes when compared to the evaluation by treating physician, and are more often required by the FDA [8, 41].
In addition to using social media for crowdsourcing purposes in rare diseases, it may also increase the readership and impact of scientific publications apart from the indexed impact factor.
An increasing number of scientific papers can be found through social media such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and ResearchGate; and journals should explore these platforms and use it in a constructive way to increase the scientific exposure [42].
In conclusion, gathering data via crowdsourcing in a patient community on Facebook seems a promising and innovative way of evaluating rare diseases, as it provides for a representative and large sample of patients with long-term follow-up and valid clinical outcome data. The results of this study suggest that local recurrence risk and functional outcome were both negatively influenced by diffuse disease, which comprises a large part of the joint, is difficult to resect completely and often requires repeat surgery, especially after arthroscopic synovectomy.
References
de St. Aubain SN, van de Rijn M (2013) Tenosynovial giant cell tumour, diffuse type. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F (eds) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 102–103
de St. Aubain SN, van de Rijn M (2013) Tenosynovial giant cell tumour, localized type. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F (eds) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 100–101
Chen WM, Wu PK, Liu CL (2012) Simultaneous anterior and posterior synovectomies for treating diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1755–1762
Van der Heijden L, Gibbons CL, Hassan AB, Kroep JR, Gelderblom H et al (2013) A multidisciplinary approach to giant cell tumors of tendon sheath and synovium--a critical appraisal of literature and treatment proposal. J Surg Oncol 107:433–445
Van der Heijden L, Gibbons CL, Dijkstra PD, Kroep JR, van Rijswijk CS et al (2012) The management of diffuse-type giant cell tumour (pigmented villonodular synovitis) and giant cell tumour of tendon sheath (nodular tenosynovitis). J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94:882–888
Wicks P (2014) Could digital patient communities be the launch pad for patient-centric trial design? Trials 15:172
Wicks P, Vaughan T, Heywood J (2014) Subjects no more: what happens when trial participants realize they hold the power? BMJ 348:g368
Gnanasakthy A, Mordin M, Clark M, DeMuro C, Fehnel S et al (2012) A review of patient-reported outcome labels in the United States: 2006 to 2010. Value Health 15:437–442
de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB (2008) The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:16
Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sunden-Lundius A, Lohmander LS, Roos EM (2006) Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. Population-based reference data for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7
de Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Favejee MM et al (2009) Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:132
Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, Bombardier C, Griffin A et al (1996) Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res 5:508–516
Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M et al (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1055–1068
Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6:e34
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15:261–266
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Bhutta CB (2012) Not by the book—facebook as a sampling frame. Sociol Methods Res 41:57–88
de Visser E, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M, Wobbes T, van de Putte LB (1999) Diffuse and localized pigmented villonodular synovitis: evaluation of treatment of 38 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:401–404
Zvijac JE, Lau AC, Hechtman KS, Uribe JW, Tjin ATE (1999) Arthroscopic treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Arthroscopy 15:613–617
Shabat S, Kollender Y, Merimsky O, Isakov J, Flusser G et al (2002) The use of surgery and yttrium 90 in the management of extensive and diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of large joints. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41:1113–1118
Chin KR, Barr SJ, Winalski C, Zurakowski D, Brick GW (2002) Treatment of advanced primary and recurrent diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:2192–2202
De Ponti A, Sansone V, Da Gama MM (2003) Result of arthroscopic treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Arthroscopy 19:602–607
Chiari C, Pirich C, Brannath W, Kotz R, Trieb K (2006) What affects the recurrence and clinical outcome of pigmented villonodular synovitis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:172–178
Wu CC, Pritsch T, Bickels J, Wienberg T, Malawer MM (2007) Two incision synovectomy and radiation treatment for diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee with extra-articular component. Knee 14:99–106
Dines JS, DeBerardino TM, Wells JL, Dodson CC, Shindle M et al (2007) Long-term follow-up of surgically treated localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Arthroscopy 23:930–937
Ozturk H, Bulut O, Oztemur Z, Bulut S (2008) Pigmented villonodular synovitis managed by Yttrium 90 after debulking surgery. Saudi Med J 29:1197–1200
Nassar WA, Bassiony AA, Elghazaly HA (2009) Treatment of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee with combined surgical and radiosynovectomy. HSS J 5:19–23
Liu C, Zhao J, Chen L (2009) Clinical results of arthroscopic treatment for localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of knee. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 23:1042–1044
Akinci O, Akalin Y, Incesu M, Eren A (2011) Long-term results of surgical treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45:149–155
Griffin AM, Ferguson PC, Catton CN, Chung PW, White LM et al (2012) Long-term outcome of the treatment of high-risk tenosynovial giant cell tumor/pigmented villonodular synovitis with radiotherapy and surgery. Cancer 118:4901–4909
Nakahara H, Matsuda S, Harimaya K, Sakamoto A, Matsumoto Y et al (2012) Clinical results of open synovectomy for treatment of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee: case series and review of literature. Knee 19:684–687
Loriaut P, Djian P, Boyer T, Bonvarlet JP, Delin C et al (2012) Arthroscopic treatment of localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1550–1553
van der Heijden L, Mastboom MJ, Dijkstra PD, van de Sande MA (2014) Functional outcome and quality of life after the surgical treatment for diffuse-type giant-cell tumour around the knee: a retrospective analysis of 30 patients. Bone Joint J 96-B:1111–1118
Jain JK, Vidyasagar JV, Sagar R, Patel H, Chetan ML, Bajaj A (2013) Arthroscopic synovectomy in pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee: clinical series and outcome. Int Orthop 37(12):2363–9
Ma X, Shi G, Xia C, Liu H, He J, Jin W (2013) Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective study of seventy five cases (eighty one joints). Int Orthop 37(6):1165–70
Botez P, Sirbu PD, Grierosu C, Mihailescu D, Savin L, Scarlat MM (2013) Adult multifocal pigmented villonodular synovitis--clinical review. Int Orthop 37(4):729–33
Valdez RS, Guterbock TM (2014) Beyond traditional advertisements: leveraging facebook’s social structures for research recruitment. J Med Internet Res 16:e243
Vastel L, Lambert P, De PG, Charrois O, Kerboull M et al (2005) Surgical treatment of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1019–1024
Hamlin BR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Morrey BF (1998) Total knee arthroplasty in patients who have pigmented villonodular synovitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:76–82
Ogura K, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Ohe K, Shinoda Y et al (2013) Impact of hospital volume on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality after musculoskeletal tumor surgery: analysis of a national administrative database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1684–1691
Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109–112
Scarlat MM, Mavrogenis AF, Pecina M, Niculescu M (2015) Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with international orthopaedics. Int Orthop 39:1459–1464
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the patients of the PVNS patient community on Facebook for compiling the questionnaires.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix: Data reporting guidelines
Appendix: Data reporting guidelines
Appendix 1: CHERRIES checklist
Appendix I: Survey announcements
12-05-2013 Announcement of study initiative: Knowledge on QOL and functional results after treatment of PVNS is lacking; validated questionnaires will be launched here soon and your valuable data will be used to create awareness and improve treatment protocols as were recently published [REF JSO, JBJS Br].
01-08-2013 Announcement including link to survey: Please fill in this first Facebook-based research initiative on functional outcome and quality of life of patients with PVNS and allow us to evaluate your quality of life and limb or joint function in order to improve the current treatment protocols and therewith the functional outcome and quality of life of patients with PVNS in the future. All data will be handled with care and are only used according to the rules of good clinical and research practice. Data stored will not be traceable to your personal details, all will be anonymized.
Further announcements including link to survey were provided after 1, 2, 5, 6 and 10 months. (19-08-2013, 31-08-2013, 03-09-2013, 17-09-2013, 22-09-2013, 22-12-2013, 31-12-2013, 29-01-2014, 23-05-2014).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
van der Heijden, L., Piner, S.R. & van de Sande, M.A.J. Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a crowdsourcing study of two hundred and seventy two patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2459–2468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3208-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3208-1