Abstract
We consider what multiple Higgs interactions may yet reveal about the scalar sector. We estimate the sensitivity of a Feynman topology-templated analysis of weak boson fusion Higgs pair production at present and future colliders — where the signal is a function of the Higgs coupling modifiers κV, κ2V, and κλ. While measurements are statistically limited at the LHC, they are under general perturbative control at present and future colliders, departures from the SM expectation give rise to a significant future potential for BSM discrimination in κ2V. We explore the landscape of BSM models in the space of deviations in κV, κ2V, and κλ, highlighting models that have measurable order-of-magnitude enhancements in either κ2V or κλ, relative to their deviation in the single Higgs coupling κV.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables, arXiv:1101.0593 [10.5170/CERN-2011-002] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for nonresonant pair production of Higgs bosons in the \( b\overline{b}b\overline{b} \) final state in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 052003 [arXiv:2301.03212] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for Higgs boson pair production in the hh → bbττ, γγWW∗, γγbb, bbbb channels with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 092004 [arXiv:1509.04670] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson pair production in events with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1707.02909] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson pair production in the bbττ final state in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 072004 [arXiv:1707.00350] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final states with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2021) 257 [arXiv:2011.12373] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson pair production in the two bottom quarks plus two photons final state in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 052001 [arXiv:2112.11876] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137531 [arXiv:2206.09401] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for resonant and non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the \( b\overline{b}{\tau}^{+}{\tau}^{-} \) decay channel using 13 TeV pp collision data from the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2023) 040 [arXiv:2209.10910] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
M. McCullough, An Indirect Model-Dependent Probe of the Higgs Self-Coupling, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015001 [Erratum ibid. 92 (2015) 039903] [arXiv:1312.3322] [INSPIRE].
G. Degrassi, P.P. Giardino, F. Maltoni and D. Pagani, Probing the Higgs self coupling via single Higgs production at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2016) 080 [arXiv:1607.04251] [INSPIRE].
M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Indirect probes of the trilinear Higgs coupling: gg → h and h → γγ, JHEP 10 (2016) 094 [arXiv:1607.03773] [INSPIRE].
G.D. Kribs et al., Electroweak oblique parameters as a probe of the trilinear Higgs boson self-interaction, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 093004 [arXiv:1702.07678] [INSPIRE].
Anisha et al., Quartic Gauge-Higgs couplings: constraints and future directions, JHEP 10 (2022) 172 [arXiv:2208.09334] [INSPIRE].
K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The Minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055014 [hep-ph/0612048] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
T. Binoth and J.J. van der Bij, Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 17 [hep-ph/9608245] [INSPIRE].
B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
R.M. Schabinger and J.D. Wells, A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 093007 [hep-ph/0509209] [INSPIRE].
C. Englert, T. Plehn, D. Zerwas and P.M. Zerwas, Exploring the Higgs portal, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 298 [arXiv:1106.3097] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, A Geometric Formulation of Higgs Effective Field Theory: Measuring the Curvature of Scalar Field Space, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 335 [arXiv:1511.00724] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson, The Effective W Approximation, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 42 [INSPIRE].
R. Contino et al., Strong Double Higgs Production at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1002.1011] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Automatic loop calculations with FeynArts, FormCalc, and LoopTools, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 89 (2000) 231 [hep-ph/0005029] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Luzio, R. Gröber and M. Spannowsky, Maxi-sizing the trilinear Higgs self-coupling: how large could it be?, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 788 [arXiv:1704.02311] [INSPIRE].
F. Arco, S. Heinemeyer and M.J. Herrero, Exploring sizable triple Higgs couplings in the 2HDM, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 884 [arXiv:2005.10576] [INSPIRE].
F. Arco, S. Heinemeyer, M. Mühlleitner and K. Radchenko, Sensitivity to triple Higgs couplings via di-Higgs production in the 2HDM at the (HL-)LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1019 [arXiv:2212.11242] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Cahn and S. Dawson, Production of Very Massive Higgs Bosons, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 196 [Erratum ibid. 138 (1984) 464] [INSPIRE].
D.L. Rainwater, D. Zeppenfeld and K. Hagiwara, Searching for H → τ +τ− in weak boson fusion at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 014037 [hep-ph/9808468] [INSPIRE].
D. Zeppenfeld, R. Kinnunen, A. Nikitenko and E. Richter-Was, Measuring Higgs boson couplings at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 013009 [hep-ph/0002036] [INSPIRE].
T. Figy, C. Oleari and D. Zeppenfeld, Next-to-leading order jet distributions for Higgs boson production via weak boson fusion, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 073005 [hep-ph/0306109] [INSPIRE].
T. Figy, Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to light Higgs Pair production via vector boson fusion, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 (2008) 1961 [arXiv:0806.2200] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Pair Production at N3LO, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 114016 [arXiv:1811.07906] [INSPIRE].
K. Arnold et al., VBFNLO: A Parton level Monte Carlo for processes with electroweak bosons, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1661 [arXiv:0811.4559] [INSPIRE].
J. Baglio et al., The measurement of the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC: theoretical status, JHEP 04 (2013) 151 [arXiv:1212.5581] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
R. Frederix et al., Higgs pair production at the LHC with NLO and parton-shower effects, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 142 [arXiv:1401.7340] [INSPIRE].
FCC collaboration, FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 755 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the \( b\overline{b}b\overline{b} \) final state using proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01 (2019) 030 [arXiv:1804.06174] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for the HH \( b\overline{b}b\overline{b} \) process via vector-boson fusion production using proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2020) 108 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 145] [arXiv:2001.05178] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for Higgs Boson Pair Production in the Four b Quark Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 081802 [arXiv:2202.09617] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for Nonresonant Pair Production of Highly Energetic Higgs Bosons Decaying to Bottom Quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 041803 [arXiv:2205.06667] [INSPIRE].
C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, arXiv:2203.11601 [10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8] [INSPIRE].
E. Conte, B. Fuks and G. Serret, MadAnalysis 5, A User-Friendly Framework for Collider Phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 222 [arXiv:1206.1599] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3 myth for the kt jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan, C. Englert, N. Greiner and M. Spannowsky, Further on up the road: hhjj production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 101802 [arXiv:1310.1084] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan et al., hhjj production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 387 [arXiv:1506.08008] [INSPIRE].
F. Bishara, R. Contino and J. Rojo, Higgs pair production in vector-boson fusion at the LHC and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 481 [arXiv:1611.03860] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52 [Erratum ibid. 612 (2022) E24] [arXiv:2207.00092] [INSPIRE].
Z. Chacko, C. Kilic, S. Najjari and C.B. Verhaaren, Testing the Scalar Sector of the Twin Higgs Model at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 055031 [arXiv:1711.05300] [INSPIRE].
S. Di Vita et al., A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders, JHEP 02 (2018) 178 [arXiv:1711.03978] [INSPIRE].
B. Li, Z.-L. Han and Y. Liao, Higgs production at future e+e− colliders in the Georgi-Machacek model, JHEP 02 (2018) 007 [arXiv:1710.00184] [INSPIRE].
H. Abramowicz et al., Higgs physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 475 [arXiv:1608.07538] [INSPIRE].
D. Domenech, M.J. Herrero, R.A. Morales and M. Ramos, Double Higgs boson production at TeV e+e− colliders with effective field theories: Sensitivity to BSM Higgs couplings, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115027 [arXiv:2208.05452] [INSPIRE].
M. Gonzalez-Lopez, M.J. Herrero and P. Martinez-Suarez, Testing anomalous H W couplings and Higgs self-couplings via double and triple Higgs production at e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 260 [arXiv:2011.13915] [INSPIRE].
CLICdp collaboration, Double Higgs boson production and Higgs self-coupling extraction at CLIC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1010 [arXiv:1901.05897] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas et al., Higgs Boson Studies at Future Particle Colliders, JHEP 01 (2020) 139 [arXiv:1905.03764] [INSPIRE].
M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies, arXiv:1606.09408 [https://doi.org/10.23731/CYRM-2017-003.255] [INSPIRE].
ILC collaboration, The International Linear Collider. A Global Project, arXiv:1901.09829 [INSPIRE].
U. Baur, T. Plehn and D.L. Rainwater, Measuring the Higgs Boson Self Coupling at the LHC and Finite Top Mass Matrix Elements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 151801 [hep-ph/0206024] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan, C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Higgs self-coupling measurements at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 112 [arXiv:1206.5001] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso and M. West, Roads to the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 096028 [arXiv:2109.13290] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Gunion, R. Vega and J. Wudka, Higgs triplets in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1673 [INSPIRE].
C. Englert, E. Re and M. Spannowsky, Pinning down Higgs triplets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035024 [arXiv:1306.6228] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector boson pairs in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 723 [arXiv:2104.04762] [INSPIRE].
A. Ismail, H.E. Logan and Y. Wu, Updated constraints on the Georgi-Machacek model from LHC Run 2, arXiv:2003.02272 [INSPIRE].
D. Egana-Ugrinovic and S. Thomas, Effective Theory of Higgs Sector Vacuum States, arXiv:1512.00144 [INSPIRE].
I. Banta et al., Non-decoupling new particles, JHEP 02 (2022) 029 [arXiv:2110.02967] [INSPIRE].
I. Banta, A strongly first-order electroweak phase transition from Loryons, JHEP 06 (2022) 099 [arXiv:2202.04608] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Ross and J.C. Taylor, Renormalization of a unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 51 (1973) 125 [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and J.-N. Lang, Renormalization of mixing angles, JHEP 11 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1808.03466] [INSPIRE].
A. Sirlin, Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)L × U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 971 [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+e− Annihilation Into μ+μ− in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi et al., Higgs After the Discovery: A Status Report, JHEP 10 (2012) 196 [arXiv:1207.1718] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudoGoldstone boson, Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 148 [hep-ph/0306259] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Sigma Models with Negative Curvature, Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 358 [arXiv:1602.00706] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Geometry of the Scalar Sector, JHEP 08 (2016) 101 [arXiv:1605.03602] [INSPIRE].
G. Ferretti, UV Completions of Partial Compositeness: The Case for a SU(4) Gauge Group, JHEP 06 (2014) 142 [arXiv:1404.7137] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, The Higgs as a Composite Nambu-Goldstone Boson, in the proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A., 1–26 June 2009 (2011), p. 235–306 [https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0005] [arXiv:1005.4269] [INSPIRE].
M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Top quark induced effective potential in a composite Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094506 [arXiv:1502.00390] [INSPIRE].
L. Del Debbio, C. Englert and R. Zwicky, A UV Complete Compositeness Scenario: LHC Constraints Meet The Lattice, JHEP 08 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1703.06064] [INSPIRE].
V. Ayyar et al., Partial compositeness and baryon matrix elements on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 094502 [arXiv:1812.02727] [INSPIRE].
L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero and N. Tantalo, Multi-representation dynamics of SU(4) composite Higgs models: chiral limit and spectral reconstructions, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 220 [arXiv:2211.09581] [INSPIRE].
R. Gröber and M. Mühlleitner, Composite Higgs Boson Pair Production at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2011) 020 [arXiv:1012.1562] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, M. McCullough and E. Salvioni, Gegenbauer Goldstones, JHEP 01 (2022) 076 [arXiv:2110.06941] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Wolf, Spaces of constant curvature, AMS Chelsea Pub., Providence, RI, U.S.A. (2011).
J.D. Bekenstein, The Relation between physical and gravitational geometry, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3641 [gr-qc/9211017] [INSPIRE].
S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant, Dilaton at the LHC: complementary probe of composite Higgs, JHEP 05 (2023) 080 [arXiv:2212.00056] [INSPIRE].
W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba, Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 111802 [arXiv:0708.1463] [INSPIRE].
R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP 04 (2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248] [INSPIRE].
Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions, JHEP 12 (2011) 099 [arXiv:1107.3987] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan, C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, New Physics in LHC Higgs boson pair production, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 055002 [arXiv:1210.8166] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Herrero and R.A. Morales, One-loop corrections for WW to HH in Higgs EFT with the electroweak chiral Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 073008 [arXiv:2208.05900] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Herrero and R.A. Morales, One-loop renormalization of vector boson scattering with the electroweak chiral Lagrangian in covariant gauges, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075013 [arXiv:2107.07890] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Delgado, A. Dobado and F.J. Llanes-Estrada, One-loop WLWL and ZLZL scattering from the electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 02 (2014) 121 [arXiv:1311.5993] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Gavela, K. Kanshin, P.A.N. Machado and S. Saa, On the renormalization of the electroweak chiral Lagrangian with a Higgs, JHEP 03 (2015) 043 [arXiv:1409.1571] [INSPIRE].
I. Asiáin, D. Espriu and F. Mescia, Introducing tools to test Higgs boson interactions via WW scattering: One-loop calculations and renormalization in the Higgs effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 015009 [arXiv:2109.02673] [INSPIRE].
R. Gómez-Ambrosio, F.J. Llanes-Estrada, A. Salas-Bernárdez and J.J. Sanz-Cillero, SMEFT is falsifiable through multi-Higgs measurements (even in the absence of new light particles), Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 (2023) 095202 [arXiv:2207.09848] [INSPIRE].
R. Gómez-Ambrosio, F.J. Llanes-Estrada, A. Salas-Bernárdez and J.J. Sanz-Cillero, Distinguishing electroweak EFTs with WLWL → n × h, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 053004 [arXiv:2204.01763] [INSPIRE].
A. Dedes et al., Feynman rules for the Standard Model Effective Field Theory in Rξ-gauges, JHEP 06 (2017) 143 [arXiv:1704.03888] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2023-023, CERN, Geneva (2023).
ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair-production of vector-like quarks in pp collision events at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with at least one leptonically decaying Z boson and a third-generation quark with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 138019 [arXiv:2210.15413] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy diboson resonances in semileptonic final states in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1165 [arXiv:2004.14636] [INSPIRE].
F. Arco, D. Domenech, M.J. Herrero and R.A. Morales, Nondecoupling effects from heavy Higgs bosons by matching 2HDM to HEFT amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 095013 [arXiv:2307.15693] [INSPIRE].
K. Hartling, K. Kumar and H.E. Logan, The decoupling limit in the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015007 [arXiv:1404.2640] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
We thank Aidan Robson and Panagiotis Stylianou for helpful conversations. C.E. is supported by the STFC under grants ST/T000945/1, ST/X000605/1, and the Leverhulme Trust under grant RPG-2021-031. C.E. and D.S. acknowledge support from the Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Associateship Scheme. W.N. is funded by a University of Glasgow College of Science and Engineering Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2307.14809
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Englert, C., Naskar, W. & Sutherland, D. BSM patterns in scalar-sector coupling modifiers. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)158
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)158