Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the possibility of testing the weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter (DM) models by applying the simplest phenomenological model which introduces an interaction term between dark energy (DE) and WIMP DM, i.e., Q = 3γDMHρDM. In general, the coupling strength γDE is close to 0 as the interaction between DE and WIMP DM is very weak, thus the effect of γDE on the evolution of Y associated with DM energy density can be safely neglected. Meanwhile, our numerical calculation also indicates that xf ≈ 20 is associated with DM freeze-out temperature, which is the same as the vanishing interaction scenario. As for DM relic density, it will be magnified by \( \frac{2-3{\upgamma}_{\mathrm{DM}}}{2}{\left[2\pi {g}_{\ast }{m}_{\mathrm{DM}}^3/\left(45{s}_0{x}_f^3\right)\right]}^{\gamma_{\mathrm{DM}}} \) times, which provides a new way to test WIMP DM models. As an example, we analyze the case in which WIMP DM is a scalar DM. (SGL+SNe+Hz) and (CMB+BAO+SNe) cosmological observations will give γDM = \( {0.134}_{-0.069}^{+0.17} \) and γDM = −0.0008 ± 0.0016, respectively. After further considering the constraints from DM direct detection experiment, DM indirect detection experiment, and DM relic density, we find that the allowed parameter space of the scalar DM model will be completely excluded for the former cosmological observations, while it will increase for the latter ones. Those two cosmological observations lead to an almost paradoxical conclusion. Therefore, one could expect more stringent constraints on the WMIP DM models, with the accumulation of more accurate cosmological observations in the near future.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G.R. Blumenthal, S.M. Faber, J.R. Primack and M.J. Rees, Formation of galaxies and large scale structure with cold dark matter, Nature 311 (1984) 517 [INSPIRE].
M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The evolution of large scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter, Astrophys. J. 292 (1985) 371 [INSPIRE].
D. Clowe et al., A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648 (2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407] [INSPIRE].
Supernova Search Team collaboration, Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201] [INSPIRE].
Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, G. Covone, M. Paolillo and Z.-H. Zhu, A multi-wavelength study of the gravitational lens COSMOS J095930+023427, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 13 (2013) 15.
S. Cao and Z.-H. Zhu, Cosmic equation of state from combined angular diameter distances: Does the tension with luminosity distances exist?, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 083006 [arXiv:1410.6567] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, X. Zheng, M. Biesiada, J. Qi, Y. Chen and Z.-H. Zhu, Ultra-compact structure in intermediate-luminosity radio quasars: building a sample of standard cosmological rulers and improving the dark energy constraints up to z ∼ 3, Astron. Astrophys. 606 (2017) A15 [arXiv:1708.08635] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, M. Biesiada, J. Qi, Y. Pan, X. Zheng, T. Xu et al., Cosmological investigation of multi-frequency VLBI observations of ultra-compact structure in z ∼ 3 radio quasars, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 749 [arXiv:1708.08639] [INSPIRE].
WMAP collaboration, Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: final maps and results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 20 [arXiv:1212.5225] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
C.O. Heinke, A. Bahramian, N. Degenaar and R. Wijnands, The nature of very faint X-ray binaries; hints from light curves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 447 (2015) 3034 [arXiv:1412.4097] [INSPIRE].
T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT search for internal bremsstrahlung signatures from dark matter annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1203.1312] [INSPIRE].
C. Weniger, A tentative gamma-ray line from dark matter annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 08 (2012) 007 [arXiv:1204.2797] [INSPIRE].
O. Macias, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, C. Gordon, R.M. Crocker and D.M. Nataf, Strong evidence that the galactic bulge is shining in gamma rays, JCAP 09 (2019) 042 [arXiv:1901.03822] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Measurement of separate cosmic-ray electron and positron spectra with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 011103 [arXiv:1109.0521] [INSPIRE].
XENON1T collaboration, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys. 148 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Dark matter results from first 98.7 days of data from the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121303 [arXiv:1607.07400] [INSPIRE].
K. Fujii et al., Physics case for the International Linear Collider, arXiv:1506.05992 [INSPIRE].
TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, First look at the physics case of TLEP, JHEP 01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
D. d’Enterria, Physics at the FCC-ee, arXiv:1602.05043 [INSPIRE].
CEPC-SPPC Study Group, CEPC-SPPC preliminary conceptual design report. 1. Physics and detector, IHEP-CEPC-DR-2015-01 (2015).
W. Zimdahl and D. Pavon, Interacting quintessence, Phys. Lett. B 521 (2001) 133 [astro-ph/0105479] [INSPIRE].
C. Feng, B. Wang, E. Abdalla and R.-K. Su, Observational constraints on the dark energy and dark matter mutual coupling, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 111 [arXiv:0804.0110] [INSPIRE].
B. Wang, J. Zang, C.-Y. Lin, E. Abdalla and S. Micheletti, Interacting dark energy and dark matter: observational constraints from cosmological parameters, Nucl. Phys. B 778 (2007) 69 [astro-ph/0607126] [INSPIRE].
B. Wang, Y.-g. Gong and E. Abdalla, Transition of the dark energy equation of state in an interacting holographic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 624 (2005) 141 [hep-th/0506069] [INSPIRE].
J. Cui and X. Zhang, Cosmic age problem revisited in the holographic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 233 [arXiv:1005.3587] [INSPIRE].
E. Abdalla and B. Wang, The mass and the coupling of the dark particle, Phys. Lett. B 651 (2007) 89 [arXiv:0705.0268] [INSPIRE].
M. Jamil and M.A. Rashid, Interacting dark energy with inhomogeneous equation of state, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 429 [arXiv:0803.3036] [INSPIRE].
O. Bertolami, F. Gil Pedro and M. Le Delliou, Dark energy-dark matter interaction and the violation of the equivalence principle from the Abell Cluster A586, Phys. Lett. B 654 (2007) 165 [astro-ph/0703462] [INSPIRE].
M. Szydlowski, Cosmological model with energy transfer, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 1 [astro-ph/0502034] [INSPIRE].
Y. Chen, Z.-H. Zhu, J.S. Alcaniz and Y. Gong, Using a phenomenological model to test the coincidence problem of dark energy, Astrophys. J. 711 (2010) 439 [arXiv:1001.1489] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, N. Liang and Z.-H. Zhu, Testing the phenomenological interacting dark energy with observational H(z) data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 1099 [arXiv:1012.4879] [INSPIRE].
H. Zhang, H. Yu, Z.-H. Zhu and Y. Gong, A quantitative criteria for the coincidence problem, Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 331 [arXiv:0906.1357] [INSPIRE].
Y. Zhang and H. Li, A new type of dark energy model, JCAP 06 (2010) 003 [arXiv:1003.2788] [INSPIRE].
S. Kumar and R.C. Nunes, Observational constraints on dark matter-dark energy scattering cross section, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 734 [arXiv:1709.02384] [INSPIRE].
W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, R.C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi and D.F. Mota, Tale of stable interacting dark energy, observational signatures, and the H0 tension, JCAP 09 (2018) 019 [arXiv:1805.08252] [INSPIRE].
E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena and S. Vagnozzi, Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: A promising solution to the H0 and cosmic shear tensions, Phys. Dark Univ. 30 (2020) 100666 [arXiv:1908.04281] [INSPIRE].
E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena and S. Vagnozzi, Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 063502 [arXiv:1910.09853] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao and N. Liang, Interaction between dark energy and dark matter: observational constraints from OHD, BAO, CMB and SNe Ia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 22 (2013) 1350082.
Y. Pan, S. Cao, Y. Gong, K. Liao and Z.-H. Zhu, Testing the interaction model with cosmological data and gamma-ray bursts, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 699 [arXiv:1211.0184] [INSPIRE].
Y. Pan, S. Cao, Y. Gong, K. Liao and Z.-H. Zhu, Testing the interaction model with cosmological data and gamma-ray bursts, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 699 [arXiv:1211.0184] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, Y. Chen, J. Zhang and Y. Ma, Testing the interaction between baryons and dark energy with recent cosmological observations, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 (2015) 1492 [INSPIRE].
J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1202.5821] [INSPIRE].
Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Observing the dark scalar doublet and its impact on the standard-model Higgs boson at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095011 [arXiv:0708.2939] [INSPIRE].
Y. Gao, T. Ghosh, K. Sinha and J.-H. Yu, SU(2) × SU(2) × U(1) interpretations of the diboson and Wh excesses, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 055030 [arXiv:1506.07511] [INSPIRE].
H. Terazawa and M. Yasue, Excited gauge and Higgs bosons in the unified composite model, Nonlin. Phenom. Complex Syst. 19 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1508.00172] [INSPIRE].
X. Liu and Z. Liu, TeV dark matter and the DAMPE electron excess, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035025 [arXiv:1711.11579] [INSPIRE].
J. Yepes, Top partners tackling vector dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135890 [arXiv:1811.06059] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, J. Qi, M. Biesiada, J. Li and Z.-H. Zhu, Measuring the viscosity of dark matter halos with strongly lensed gravitational waves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett. 502 (2021) L16.
V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, LHC phenomenology of an extended standard model with a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035005 [arXiv:0706.4311] [INSPIRE].
M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Vacuum stability, perturbativity, and scalar singlet dark matter, JHEP 01 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0910.3167] [INSPIRE].
H. Han, J.M. Yang, Y. Zhang and S. Zheng, Collider signatures of Higgs-portal scalar dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 109 [arXiv:1601.06232] [INSPIRE].
H. Wu and S. Zheng, Scalar dark matter: real vs. complex, JHEP 03 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1610.06292] [INSPIRE].
C. Boehm, X. Chu, J.-L. Kuo and J. Pradler, Scalar dark matter candidates revisited, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075005 [arXiv:2010.02954] [INSPIRE].
Y. Pan, S. Cao and L. Li, Constraints on interacting dark energy from time delay lenses, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25 (2015) 1650003 [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, M. Biesiada, R. Gavazzi, A. Piórkowska and Z.-H. Zhu, Cosmology with strong-lensing systems, Astrophys. J. 806 (2015) 185 [arXiv:1509.07649] [INSPIRE].
Y. Chen, R. Li, Y. Shu and X. Cao, Assessing the effect of lens mass model in cosmological application with updated galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488 (2019) 3745 [arXiv:1809.09845] [INSPIRE].
J.-J. Wei and X.-F. Wu, An improved method to measure the cosmic curvature, Astrophys. J. 838 (2017) 160 [arXiv:1611.00904] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Scolnic et al., The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample, Astrophys. J. 859 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1710.00845] [INSPIRE].
L. Bian et al., The gravitational-wave physics II: progress, arXiv:2106.10235 [INSPIRE].
A. Piórkowska-Kurpas et al., Inspiraling double compact object detection and lensing rate: forecast for DECIGO and B-DECIGO, Astrophys. J. 908 (2021) 196 [arXiv:2005.08727] [INSPIRE].
Y. Chen, C.-Q. Geng, S. Cao, Y.-M. Huang and Z.-H. Zhu, Constraints on a ϕCDM model from strong gravitational lensing and updated Hubble parameter measurements, JCAP 02 (2015) 010 [arXiv:1312.1443] [INSPIRE].
J.-Z. Qi, S. Cao, S. Zhang, M. Biesiada, Y. Wu and Z.-H. Zhu, The distance sum rule from strong lensing systems and quasars — Test of cosmic curvature and beyond, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483 (2019) 1104 [arXiv:1803.01990] [INSPIRE].
T.-H. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Cao, S. Geng, Y. Liu and X. Ji, Implications from simulated strong gravitational lensing systems: constraining cosmological parameters using Gaussian Processes, Astrophys. J. 886 (2019) 94.
T.-H. Liu, S. Cao, J. Zhang, M. Biesiada, Y. Liu and Y. Lian, Testing the cosmic curvature at high redshifts: the combination of LSST strong lensing systems and quasars as new standard candles, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 496 (2020) 708.
J.-Z. Qi, J.-W. Zhao, S. Cao, M. Biesiada and Y. Liu, Measurements of the Hubble constant and cosmic curvature with quasars: ultracompact radio structure and strong gravitational lensing, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (2021) 2179 [arXiv:2011.00713] [INSPIRE].
Y. Ma et al., Testing cosmic opacity from the combination of strongly lensed and unlensed supernova Ia, Astrophys. J. 887 (2019) 163.
S. Cao, G. Covone and Z.-H. Zhu, Testing the dark energy with gravitational lensing statistics, Astrophys. J. 755 (2012) 31.
Y.-B. Ma, S. Cao, J. Zhang, S. Geng, Y. Liu, T. Liu et al., Implications of the lens redshift distribution of strong lensing systems: cosmological parameters and the global properties of early-type galaxies, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 121 [arXiv:1901.09737] [INSPIRE].
S. Geng, S. Cao, Y. Liu, T. Liu, M. Biesiada and Y. Lian, The velocity dispersion function of early-type galaxies and its redshift evolution: the newest results from lens redshift test, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (2021) 1319 [arXiv:2102.12140] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, M. Biesiada, M. Yao and Z.-H. Zhu, Limits on the power-law mass and luminosity density profiles of elliptical galaxies from gravitational lensing systems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 461 (2016) 2192 [arXiv:1604.05625] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, X. Li, M. Biesiada, T. Xu, Y. Cai and Z.-H. Zhu, Test of parametrized post-Newtonian gravity with galaxy-scale strong lensing systems, Astrophys. J. 835 (2017) 92 [arXiv:1701.00357] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, J. Qi, Z. Cao, M. Biesiada, J. Li, Y. Pan and Z.-H. Zhu, Direct test of the FLRW metric from strongly lensed gravitational wave observations, Sci. Rept. 9 (2019) 11608.
J. Qi, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, X. Ding, Z.-H. Zhu and X. Zheng, Strongly gravitationally lensed type-IA supernovae: Direct test of the Friedman-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 023530 [arXiv:1802.05532] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, J. Qi, M. Biesiada, X. Zheng, T. Xu and Z.-H. Zhu, Testing the speed of light over cosmological distances: the combination of strongly lensed and unlensed Type Ia supernovae, Astrophys. J. 867 (2018) 50 [arXiv:1810.01287] [INSPIRE].
S. Cao, J. Qi, M. Biesiada, T. Liu and Z.-H. Zhu, Precise measurements of the speed of light with high-redshift quasars: ultra-compact radio structure and strong gravitational lensing, Astrophys. J. Lett. 888 (2020) L25 [INSPIRE].
T. Liu, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, Y. Liu, Y. Lian and Y. Zhang, Consistency testing for invariance of the speed of light at different redshifts: the newest results from strong lensing and Type Ia supernovae observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506 (2021) 2181.
M.W. Auger et al., The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. X. Stellar, dynamical, and total mass correlations of massive early-type galaxies, Astrophys. J. 724 (2010) 511 [arXiv:1007.2880] [INSPIRE].
M. Cappellari et al., The SAURON project. 4. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the fundamental plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 366 (2006) 1126 [astro-ph/0505042] [INSPIRE].
I. Jorgensen, M. Franx and P. Kjaergaard, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 276 (1995) 4.
Y. Wu et al., Exploring the “L-σ” relation of HII galaxies and giant extragalactic HII regions acting as standard candles, Astrophys. J. Lett. 888 (2020) 113.
X. Zheng et al., Multiple measurements of quasars acting as standard probes: model independent calibration and exploring the dark energy equation of states, Science China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) 259511.
Y. Liu et al., Model-independent constraints on cosmic curvature: implication from updated Hubble diagram of high-redshift standard candles, Astrophys. J. 901 (2020) 129 [arXiv:2008.08378] [INSPIRE].
X. Zheng, S. Cao, Y. Liu, M. Biesiada, T. Liu, S. Geng et al., Model-independent constraints on cosmic curvature: implication from the future space gravitational-wave antenna DECIGO, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 14 [arXiv:2012.14607] [INSPIRE].
X. Zheng, X. Ding, M. Biesiada, S. Cao and Z. Zhu, What are Omh2(z1, z2) and Om(z1, z2) diagnostics telling us in light of H(z) data?, Astrophys. J. 825 (2016) 17 [arXiv:1604.07910] [INSPIRE].
J.-Z Qi et al., What is parameterized Om(z) diagnostics telling us in light of recent observations?, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 18 (2018) 66.
A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103511 [astro-ph/0205436] [INSPIRE].
A.G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L.M. Macri and D. Scolnic, Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics beyond ΛCDM, Astrophys. J. 876 (2019) 85 [arXiv:1903.07603] [INSPIRE].
X. Zheng, M. Biesiada, S. Cao, J. Qi and Z.-H. Zhu, Ultra-compact structure in radio quasars as a cosmological probe: a revised study of the interaction between cosmic dark sectors, JCAP 10 (2017) 030 [arXiv:1705.06204] [INSPIRE].
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont and C. Baccigalupi, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) 6.
F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 3017 [arXiv:1106.3366] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W.J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample — I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449 (2015) 835 [arXiv:1409.3242] [INSPIRE].
BOSS collaboration, The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470 (2017) 2617 [arXiv:1607.03155] [INSPIRE].
M. Blomqvist, H.M. Bourboux, N.G. Busca, V.S. Agathe and J. Rich, Baryon acoustic oscillations from the cross-correlation of Lyα absorption and quasars in eBOSS DR14, Astron. Astrophys. 629 (2019) 86.
P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
X.-G. He and J. Tandean, New LUX and PandaX-II results illuminating the simplest Higgs-portal dark matter models, JHEP 12 (2016) 074 [arXiv:1609.03551] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025 [Erratum ibid. 92 (2015) 039906] [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, JCAP 04 (2016) 027 [arXiv:1512.07501] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero, A. Berlin, D. Hooper and M.-X. Lin, Toward (finally!) ruling out Z and Higgs mediated dark matter models, JCAP 12 (2016) 029 [arXiv:1609.09079] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 08 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1606.02266] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2011.11548
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, W., He, Y., Diao, JW. et al. A new way to test the WIMP dark matter models. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)124
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)124