Abstract
Finding out if neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana particles is known to be extremely difficult due to the smallness of neutrino mass and the fact that in the limit mν = 0 both Dirac and Majorana neutrinos become Weyl fermions, i.e. are indistinguishable. There have been suggestions in the literature that in the case of processes with production of a neutrino-antineutrino pair (if neutrinos are Dirac particles) or two neutrinos (if they are of Majorana nature) quantum statistics may be of help. This is because for Majorana neutrinos quantum indistinguishability of identical particles requires the amplitude of the process to be antisymmetrized with respect to the interchange of the final-state neutrinos, whereas no such antisymmetrization must be done for Dirac neutrinos. It has been claimed that the resulting differences between the cross sections for Dirac and Majorana neutrinos persist even for arbitrarily small but not exactly vanishing neutrino mass. We demonstrate that, at least in the framework of the Standard Model, this is not the case. We also give a general proof that within the Standard Model quantum statistics does not help tell Dirac and Majorana neutrinos apart in the limit of negligibly small mν/E.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
K.M. Case, Reformulation of the Majorana theory of the neutrino, Phys. Rev. 107 (1957) 307 [INSPIRE].
L.F. Li and F. Wilczek, Physical processes involving Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 143 [INSPIRE].
B. Kayser and R.E. Shrock, Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in neutral current reactions, Phys. Lett. B 112 (1982) 137 [INSPIRE].
B. Kayser, Majorana neutrinos and their electromagnetic properties, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1662 [INSPIRE].
W. Rodejohann, X.-J. Xu and C.E. Yaguna, Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in the presence of general interactions, JHEP 05 (2017) 024 [arXiv:1702.05721] [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrinoless double beta decay in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2951 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolinski, A.W.P. Poon and W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless double-beta decay: Status and prospects, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 219 [arXiv:1902.04097] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and J.T. Pantaleone, Heavy Majorana neutrino production, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2172 [INSPIRE].
J. Kogo and S.Y. Tsai, Production and decay of a pair of heavy neutrinos, Prog. Theor. Phys. 86 (1991) 183 [INSPIRE].
A. Hofer and L.M. Sehgal, Pair production and correlated decay of heavy Majorana neutrinos in e+e− collisions, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1944 [hep-ph/9603240] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Kim, M.V.N. Murthy and D. Sahoo, Inferring the nature of active neutrinos: Dirac or Majorana?, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 113006 [arXiv:2106.11785] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Kim, Practical Dirac Majorana confusion theorem: issues and applicability, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 972 [arXiv:2307.05654] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Bilenky, Neutrino Majorana, hep-ph/0605172 [INSPIRE].
CHARM-II collaboration, Flavor universality of neutrino couplings with the Z, Phys. Lett. B 320 (1994) 203 [INSPIRE].
CHARM-II collaboration, Precision measurement of electroweak parameters from the scattering of muon-neutrinos on electrons, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 246 [INSPIRE].
R. Plaga, A demonstration that the observed neutrinos are not Majorana particles, hep-ph/9610545 [INSPIRE].
B. Kayser, Comment on recent argument that neutrinos are not Majorana particles, hep-ph/9703294 [INSPIRE].
S. Hannestad, Can neutrinos be Majorana particles?, hep-ph/9701216 [INSPIRE].
S.H. Hansen, On the possibility of distinguishing between Majorana and Dirac neutrinos, hep-ph/9708359 [INSPIRE].
M. Zralek, On the possibilities of distinguishing Dirac from Majorana neutrinos, Acta Phys. Polon. B 28 (1997) 2225 [hep-ph/9711506] [INSPIRE].
M. Czakon, M. Zralek and J. Gluza, Are neutrinos Dirac or Majorana particles?, Acta Phys. Polon. B 30 (1999) 3121 [hep-ph/9910357] [INSPIRE].
A.B. Balantekin, A. de Gouvêa and B. Kayser, Addressing the Majorana vs. Dirac question with neutrino decays, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 488 [arXiv:1808.10518] [INSPIRE].
E.K. Akhmedov and J. Kopp, Neutrino oscillations: quantum mechanics vs. quantum field theory, JHEP 04 (2010) 008 [Erratum ibid. 10 (2013) 052] [arXiv:1001.4815] [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Majorana neutrinos and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 1883 [Erratum ibid. 25 (1982) 283] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Barr and A. Halprin, A comment on the possibility of distinguising between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in νμe scattering, Phys. Lett. B 202 (1988) 279 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Musolf and B.R. Holstein, Observability of the anapole moment and neutrino charge radius, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 2956 [INSPIRE].
C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 531 [arXiv:1403.6344] [INSPIRE].
B. Peon, Is Hinchliffe’s rule true?, Print-88-0582 (1988) [INSPIRE] [https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1990/9007/9007095.pdf].
J.M. Márquez, D. Portillo-Sánchez and P. Roig, Dirac-Majorana neutrinos distinction in four-body decays, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 033005 [arXiv:2305.14140] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Kim, M.V.N. Murthy and D. Sahoo, Comments on “Can quantum statistics help distinguish Dirac from Majorana neutrinos?”, arXiv:2402.11386v2.
D. Binosi and L. Theussl, JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams, Comput. Phys. Commun. 161 (2004) 76 [hep-ph/0309015] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Alexei Smirnov for numerous useful discussions. EA is grateful to C.S. Kim and Dibyakrupa Sahoo for discussions concerning refs. [11] and [12]. We thank J. M. Márquez for drawing our attention to ref. [29]. All diagrams in this work were generated with JaxoDraw [31].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2402.05172
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Akhmedov, E., Trautner, A. Can quantum statistics help distinguish Dirac from Majorana neutrinos?. J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)156
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)156