Abstract
The recent confirmation by the Fermilab-based Muon g-2 experiment of the (g − 2)μ anomaly has important implications for allowed particle spectra in softly broken supersymmetry (SUSY) models with neutralino dark matter (DM). Generally, the DM has to be quite light, with the mass up to a few hundred GeV, and bino-dominated if it is to provide most of DM in the Universe. Otherwise, a higgsino or wino dominated DM is also allowed but only as a strongly subdominant component of at most a few percent of the total density. These general patterns can easily be found in the phenomenological models of SUSY but in GUT-constrained scenarios this proves much more challenging. In this paper we revisit the issue in the framework of some unified SUSY models with different GUT boundary conditions on the soft masses. We study the so-called non-universal gaugino model (NUGM) in which the mass of the gluino is disunified from those of the bino and the wino and an SO(10) and an SU(5) GUT-inspired models as examples. We find that in these unified frameworks the above two general patterns of DM can also be found, and thus the muon anomaly can also be accommodated, unlike in the simplest frameworks of the CMSSM or the NUHM. We show the resulting values of direct detection cross-section for points that do and do not satisfy the muon anomaly. On the other hand, it will be challenging to access those solutions at the LHC because the resulting spectra are generally very compressed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsányi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon 2 magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
A. Fowlie, K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Dark matter and collider signatures of the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055012 [arXiv:1306.1567] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, A. Choudhury, A. Datta and S. Poddar, The Electroweak Sector of the pMSSM in the Light of LHC — 8 TeV and Other Data, JHEP 07 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1404.4841] [INSPIRE].
A. Choudhury and S. Mondal, Revisiting the Exclusion Limits from Direct Chargino-Neutralino Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055024 [arXiv:1603.05502] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, A. Datta, N. Ganguly and S. Poddar, Multilepton signals of heavier electroweakinos at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2017) 117 [arXiv:1707.04410] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi et al., Likelihood Analysis of the pMSSM11 in Light of LHC 13-TeV Data, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 256 [arXiv:1710.11091] [INSPIRE].
K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and S. Mukhopadhyay, Closing in on the chargino contribution to the muon g-2 in the MSSM: current LHC constraints, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 055035 [arXiv:1706.09313] [INSPIRE].
P. Cox, C. Han and T.T. Yanagida, Muon g − 2 and dark matter in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055015 [arXiv:1805.02802] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, J. Osborne, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, Supersymmetry and LHC Missing Energy Signals, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115010 [arXiv:1809.11082] [INSPIRE].
M. Abdughani, K.-I. Hikasa, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and J. Zhao, Testing electroweak SUSY for muon g − 2 and dark matter at the LHC and beyond, JHEP 11 (2019) 095 [arXiv:1909.07792] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Kitahara, Muon g − 2 vs LHC Run 2 in supersymmetric models, JHEP 04 (2020) 165 [arXiv:2001.11025] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, Improved (g − 2)μ Measurements and Supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 984 [arXiv:2006.15157] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, Improved (g − 2)μ Measurements and Wino/Higgsino Dark Matter, arXiv:2103.13403 [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [arXiv:1112.4391] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., Constrained Supersymmetry after two years of LHC data: a global view with Fittino, JHEP 06 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1204.4199] [INSPIRE].
A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM Favoring New Territories: The Impact of New LHC Limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1206.0264] [INSPIRE].
O. Buchmueller et al., The CMSSM and NUHM1 in Light of 7 TeV LHC, Bs → μ+ μ− and XENON100 Data, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2243 [arXiv:1207.7315] [INSPIRE].
C. Strege, G. Bertone, F. Feroz, M. Fornasa, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Global Fits of the CMSSM and NUHM including the LHC Higgs discovery and new XENON100 constraints, JCAP 04 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1212.2636] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., Killing the CMSSM softly, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 96 [arXiv:1508.05951] [INSPIRE].
C. Han, K.-i. Hikasa, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Status of CMSSM in light of current LHC Run-2 and LUX data, Phys. Lett. B 769 (2017) 470 [arXiv:1612.02296] [INSPIRE].
GAMBIT collaboration, Global fits of GUT-scale SUSY models with GAMBIT, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 824 [arXiv:1705.07935] [INSPIRE].
S. Akula and P. Nath, Gluino-driven radiative breaking, Higgs boson mass, muon g-2, and the Higgs diphoton decay in supergravity unification, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115022 [arXiv:1304.5526] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo, S. Trojanowski and A.J. Williams, Looking for supersymmetry: ~1 TeV WIMP and the power of complementarity in LHC and dark matter searches, in 50th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, (2015) [arXiv:1507.07446] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and A.J. Williams, GUT-inspired SUSY and the muon g − 2 anomaly: prospects for LHC 14 TeV, JHEP 06 (2015) 020 [arXiv:1503.08219] [INSPIRE].
S. Mohanty, S. Rao and D.P. Roy, Reconciling the muon g − 2 and dark matter relic density with the LHC results in nonuniversal gaugino mass models, JHEP 09 (2013) 027 [arXiv:1303.5830] [INSPIRE].
J. Chakrabortty, S. Mohanty and S. Rao, Non-universal gaugino mass GUT models in the light of dark matter and LHC constraints, JHEP 02 (2014) 074 [arXiv:1310.3620] [INSPIRE].
I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir, Q. Shafi and C.S. Un, Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses and Muon g-2, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035008 [arXiv:1403.2337] [INSPIRE].
M. Adeel Ajaib, I. Gogoladze and Q. Shafi, GUT-inspired supersymmetric model for h → γγ and the muon g-2, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095005 [arXiv:1501.04125] [INSPIRE].
P. Cox, C. Han, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Gaugino mediation scenarios for muon g − 2 and dark matter, JHEP 08 (2019) 097 [arXiv:1811.12699] [INSPIRE].
H.M. Tran and H.T. Nguyen, GUT-inspired MSSM in light of muon g − 2 and LHC results at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035040 [arXiv:1812.11757] [INSPIRE].
M. Abdughani, Y.-Z. Fan, L. Feng, Y.-L. Sming Tsai, L. Wu and Q. Yuan, A common origin of muon g-2 anomaly, Galaxy Center GeV excess and AMS-02 anti-proton excess in the NMSSM, arXiv:2104.03274 [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, J. Lian, Y. Pan, D. Zhang and P. Zhu, Improved (g − 2)μ Measurement and Singlino dark matter in the general NMSSM, arXiv:2104.03284 [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, The new “MUON G-2” Result and Supersymmetry, arXiv:2104.03287 [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai, Muon g − 2 in Gauge Mediation without SUSY CP Problem, arXiv:2104.03289 [INSPIRE].
C. Han, Muon g-2 and CP-violation in MSSM, arXiv:2104.03292 [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Xiao, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, GUT-scale constrained SUSY in light of E989 muon g-2 measurement, arXiv:2104.03262 [INSPIRE].
S. Heinemeyer, E. Kpatcha, I. Lara, D.E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz and N. Nagata, The new (g − 2)μ result and the μνSSM, arXiv:2104.03294 [INSPIRE].
S. Iwamoto, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Wino-Higgsino dark matter in the MSSM from the g − 2 anomaly, arXiv:2104.03223 [INSPIRE].
S. Baum, M. Carena, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, The Tiny (g-2) Muon Wobble from Small-μ Supersymmetry, arXiv:2104.03302 [INSPIRE].
W. Yin, Muon g − 2 Anomaly in Anomaly Mediation, arXiv:2104.03259 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, M. Schutten and J. De Wit, Dark matter, fine-tuning and (g − 2)μ in the pMSSM, arXiv:2104.03245 [INSPIRE].
Y. Gu, N. Liu, L. Su and D. Wang, Heavy Bino and Slepton for Muon g-2 Anomaly, arXiv:2104.03239 [INSPIRE].
P. Cox, C. Han and T.T. Yanagida, Muon g − 2 and Co-annihilating Dark Matter in the MSSM, arXiv:2104.03290 [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Kitahara, Supersymmetric Interpretation of the Muon g − 2 Anomaly, arXiv:2104.03217 [INSPIRE].
H.-B. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, J.-L. Yang and T.-F. Feng, Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the μνSSM, arXiv:2104.03489 [INSPIRE].
J.-L. Yang, H.-B. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-X. Dong and T.-F. Feng, Muon (g − 2) in the B-LSSM, arXiv:2104.03542 [INSPIRE].
P. Athron, C. Balázs, D.H. Jacob, W. Kotlarski, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, New physics explanations of aμ in light of the FNAL muon g − 2 measurement, arXiv:2104.03691 [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski, Low fine tuning in the MSSM with higgsino dark matter and unification constraints, JHEP 04 (2014) 166 [arXiv:1402.1328] [INSPIRE].
T. Moroi, The muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum ibid. 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin and J.D. Wells, Muon Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment in Supersymmetric Theories, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 035003 [hep-ph/0103067] [INSPIRE].
G.L. Kane, C.F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski and J.D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6173 [hep-ph/9312272] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski and E.M. Sessolo, Two ultimate tests of constrained supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1302.5956] [INSPIRE].
L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and A.J. Williams, What next for the CMSSM and the NUHM: Improved prospects for superpartner and dark matter detection, JHEP 08 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1405.4289] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron, C. Balázs, B. Farmer, A. Fowlie, D. Harries and D. Kim, Bayesian analysis and naturalness of (Next-to-)Minimal Supersymmetric Models, JHEP 10 (2017) 160 [arXiv:1709.07895] [INSPIRE].
V. Berezinsky, A. Bottino, J.R. Ellis, N. Fornengo, G. Mignola and S. Scopel, Neutralino dark matter in supersymmetric models with nonuniversal scalar mass terms, Astropart. Phys. 5 (1996) 1 [hep-ph/9508249] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath and R.L. Arnowitt, Nonuniversal soft SUSY breaking and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2820 [hep-ph/9701301] [INSPIRE].
L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.A. Varley, Global fits of the Non-Universal Higgs Model, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015014 [Erratum ibid. 83 (2011) 039901] [arXiv:0903.1279] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, K.A. Olive and P. Sandick, Update on the Direct Detection of Dark Matter in MSSM Models with Non-Universal Higgs Masses, New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105015 [arXiv:0905.0107] [INSPIRE].
A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, K. Wang, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Solving the muon g-2 anomaly in CMSSM extension with non-universal gaugino masses, JHEP 12 (2018) 041 [arXiv:1808.10851] [INSPIRE].
G.L. Kane and S.F. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [hep-ph/9810374] [INSPIRE].
M. Bastero-Gil, G.L. Kane and S.F. King, Fine tuning constraints on supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 103 [hep-ph/9910506] [INSPIRE].
H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and Y. Omura, Relaxed fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0703044] [INSPIRE].
D. Horton and G.G. Ross, Naturalness and Focus Points with Non-Universal Gaugino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857] [INSPIRE].
Y. Kawamura, H. Murayama and M. Yamaguchi, Low-energy effective Lagrangian in unified theories with nonuniversal supersymmetry breaking terms, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1337 [hep-ph/9406245] [INSPIRE].
C.F. Kolda and S.P. Martin, Low-energy supersymmetry with D term contributions to scalar masses, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 3871 [hep-ph/9503445] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, The State of the Art — Gauge Theories, AIP Conf. Proc. 23 (1975) 575 [INSPIRE].
H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons, Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193 [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384 (2008) 449 [arXiv:0704.3704] [INSPIRE].
F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Allanach and T. Cridge, The Calculation of Sparticle and Higgs Decays in the Minimal and Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Models: SOFTSUSY4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220 (2017) 417 [arXiv:1703.09717] [INSPIRE].
R.V. Harlander, J. Klappert and A. Voigt, Higgs mass prediction in the MSSM at three-loop level in a pure \( \overline{DR} \) context, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 814 [arXiv:1708.05720] [INSPIRE].
P. Kant, R.V. Harlander, L. Mihaila and M. Steinhauser, Light MSSM Higgs boson mass to three-loop accuracy, JHEP 08 (2010) 104 [arXiv:1005.5709] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 138 [arXiv:0811.4169] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1211 [arXiv:2006.06007] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2711 [arXiv:1305.1933] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 145 [arXiv:2012.09197] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: A program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: Version 1.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 577 [hep-ph/0405253] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov, Recasting direct detection limits within MicrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard Dark Matter scenarios, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 239 [arXiv:2003.08621] [INSPIRE].
PICO collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60 C3 F8 Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 022001 [arXiv:1902.04031] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
A. Sommerfeld, Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen, Annalen Phys. 403 (1931) 257.
N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].
A. Hryczuk, The Sommerfeld enhancement for scalar particles and application to sfermion co-annihilation regions, Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 271 [arXiv:1102.4295] [INSPIRE].
A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi and G. Robbins, SuperIso Relic v4: A program for calculating dark matter and flavour physics observables in Supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 239 (2019) 238 [arXiv:1806.11489] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT and DES collaborations, Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys. J. 834 (2017) 110 [arXiv:1611.03184] [INSPIRE].
AMS collaboration, Antiproton Flux, Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio, and Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 091103 [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Constraining heavy dark matter with cosmic-ray antiprotons, JCAP 04 (2018) 004 [arXiv:1711.05274] [INSPIRE].
M. Boudaud, M. Cirelli, G. Giesen and P. Salati, A fussy revisitation of antiprotons as a tool for Dark Matter searches, JCAP 05 (2015) 013 [arXiv:1412.5696] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New Physics in Rare B Decays after Moriond 2021, arXiv:2103.13370 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, LHC Seminar New results on theoretically clean observables in rare B-meson decays from LHCb, 23 March, 2021, https://indico.cern.ch/event/976688/ attachments/2213706/3747159/santimaria_LHC_seminar_2021.pdf.
HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ -lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 226 [arXiv:1909.12524] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, D.A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori and M. Neubert, Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies, arXiv:2103.16558 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, arXiv:2103.11769 [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in b → s transitions after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1411.3161] [INSPIRE].
M. Drees, H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall and J.S. Kim, CheckMATE: Confronting your Favourite New Physics Model with LHC Data, Comput. Phys. Commun. 187 (2015) 227 [arXiv:1312.2591] [INSPIRE].
D. Dercks, N. Desai, J.S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall and T. Weber, CheckMATE 2: From the model to the limit, Comput. Phys. Commun. 221 (2017) 383 [arXiv:1611.09856] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005 [arXiv:1911.12606] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1712.02118] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135502 [arXiv:2004.05153] [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and R. Sato, Mass Splitting between Charged and Neutral Winos at Two-Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 252 [arXiv:1212.5989] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
CDF and D0 collaborations, Combination of CDF and D0 results on the mass of the top quark using up 9.7 fb−1 at the Tevatron, arXiv:1608.01881 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the \( \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} \) → lepton+jets channel from \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV ATLAS data and combination with previous results, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 290 [arXiv:1810.01772] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the all-jets final state at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and combination with the lepton+jets channel, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 313 [arXiv:1812.10534] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron et al., GM2Calc: Precise MSSM prediction for (g − 2) of the muon, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 62 [arXiv:1510.08071] [INSPIRE].
P. von Weitershausen, M. Schafer, H. Stöckinger-Kim and D. Stöckinger, Photonic SUSY Two-Loop Corrections to the Muon Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 093004 [arXiv:1003.5820] [INSPIRE].
H. Fargnoli, C. Gnendiger, S. Paßehr, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Two-loop corrections to the muon magnetic moment from fermion/sfermion loops in the MSSM: detailed results, JHEP 02 (2014) 070 [arXiv:1311.1775] [INSPIRE].
M. Bach, J.-h. Park, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Large muon (g − 2) with TeV-scale SUSY masses for tan β → ∞, JHEP 10 (2015) 026 [arXiv:1504.05500] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, JCAP 11 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2007.08796] [INSPIRE].
J. Billard, L. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 023524 [arXiv:1307.5458] [INSPIRE].
A. Hryczuk et al., Testing dark matter with Cherenkov light — prospects of H.E.S.S. and CTA for exploring minimal supersymmetry, JHEP 10 (2019) 043 [arXiv:1905.00315] [INSPIRE].
M. Berggren, What pp SUSY limits mean for future e+ e− colliders, in International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders, (2020) [arXiv:2003.12391] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two or three leptons at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 995 [arXiv:1803.02762] [INSPIRE].
X. Cid Vidal et al., Report from Working Group 3 : Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 585 [arXiv:1812.07831] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2104.04458
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborti, M., Roszkowski, L. & Trojanowski, S. GUT-constrained supersymmetry and dark matter in light of the new (g − 2)μ determination. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2021)252
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2021)252