Abstract
We report on an updated sensitivity for proton decay via p → \( \overline{\nu} \)K+ at large, dual phase liquid argon time projection chambers (LAr TPCs). Our work builds on a previous study in which several nucleon decay modes have been simulated and analyzed [1]. At the time several assumptions were needed to be made on the detector and the backgrounds. Since then, the community has made progress in defining these, and the computing power available enables us to fully simulate and reconstruct large samples in order to perform a better estimate of the sensitivity to proton decay. In this work, we examine the benchmark channel p → \( \overline{\nu} \)K+, which was previously found to be one of the cleanest channels. Using an improved neutrino event generator and a fully simulated LAr TPC detector response combined with a dedicated neural network for kaon identification, we demonstrate that a lifetime sensitivity of τ /Br (p → \( \overline{\nu} \)K+) > 7 × 1034 years at 90% confidence level can be reached at an exposure of 1 megaton · year in quasi-background-free conditions, confirming the superiority of the LAr TPC over other technologies to address the challenging proton decay modes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Bueno et al., Nucleon decay searches with large liquid Argon TPC detectors at shallow depths: atmospheric neutrinos and cosmogenic backgrounds, JHEP 04 (07) 041 [hep-ph/0701101] [INSPIRE].
A. Rubbia, Experiments for CP violation: A Giant liquid argon scintillation, Cerenkov and charge imaging experiment?, 2nd International Workshop on Neutrino Oscillations in Venice, Venice Italy (2004), pg. 321.
A. Rubbia, Underground Neutrino Detectors for Particle and Astroparticle Science: The Giant Liquid Argon Charge Imaging ExpeRiment (GLACIER), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 171 (2009) 012020 [arXiv:0908.1286] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Search for proton decay via p → e+ π0 and p → μ+ π0 in 0.31 megaton · years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 012004 [arXiv:1610.03597] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos and J. Walker, Flipping SU(5) out of trouble, Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 99 [hep-ph/0205336] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Aspects of split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 709 (2005) 3 [hep-ph/0409232] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Proton decay signatures of orbifold GUTs, Phys. Lett. B 539 (2002) 119 [hep-ph/0204037] [INSPIRE].
I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Proton decay in intersecting D-brane models, Nucl. Phys. B 664 (2003) 3 [hep-th/0304079] [INSPIRE].
P. Nath, A.H. Chamseddine and R.L. Arnowitt, Nucleon Decay in Supergravity Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 2348 [INSPIRE].
Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Flavor problem, proton decay and neutrino oscillations in SUSY models with anomalous U(1), Phys. Lett. B 473 (2000) 272 [hep-ph/9911264] [INSPIRE].
V. Lucas and S. Raby, Nucleon decay in a realistic SO(10) SUSY GUT, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6986 [hep-ph/9610293] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Pati, Probing Grand Unification Through Neutrino Oscillations, Leptogenesis, and Proton Decay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 4135 [hep-ph/0305221] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, J.C. Pati and F. Wilczek, Suggested new modes in supersymmetric proton decay, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 337 [hep-ph/9712307] [INSPIRE].
M.L. Alciati, F. Feruglio, Y. Lin and A. Varagnolo, Proton Lifetime from SU(5) Unification in Extra Dimensions, JHEP 03 (2005) 054 [hep-ph/0501086] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Search for proton decay via p → νK+ using 260 kiloton · year data of Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 072005 [arXiv:1408.1195] [INSPIRE].
B. Aimard et al., A 4 tonne demonstrator for large-scale dual-phase liquid argon time projection chambers, 2018 JINST 13 P11003 [arXiv:1806.03317] [INSPIRE].
C. Alt, Sensitivity study for proton decay via p → \( \overline{\nu} \)K+ using a 10 kiloton dual phase liquid argon time projection chamber at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich Switzerland (2020).
DUNE collaboration, Volume I. Introduction to DUNE, 2020 JINST 15 T08008 [arXiv:2002.02967] [INSPIRE].
L. Álvarez-Ruso, Y. Hayato and J. Nieves, Progress and open questions in the physics of neutrino cross sections at intermediate energies, New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 075015 [arXiv:1403.2673] [INSPIRE].
C. Andreopoulos et al., The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 614 (2010) 87 [arXiv:0905.2517] [INSPIRE].
M. Honda, M. Sajjad Athar, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara and S. Midorikawa, Atmospheric neutrino flux calculation using the NRLMSISE-00 atmospheric model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 023004 [arXiv:1502.03916] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23, δCP, and the mass ordering, JHEP 01 (2019) 106 [arXiv:1811.05487] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Dziewonski and D.L. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25 (1981) 297.
R.D. Woods and D.S. Saxon, Diffuse Surface Optical Model for Nucleon-Nuclei Scattering, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 577 [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek and J.L. Ritchie, Fermi Motion Effects in Deep Inelastic Lepton Scattering from Nuclear Targets, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 1070 [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek and J.L. Ritchie, Further Studies of Fermi Motion Effects in Lepton Scattering from Nuclear Targets, Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 1400 [INSPIRE].
W.J. Marciano and Z. Parsa, Neutrino electron scattering theory, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2629 [hep-ph/0403168] [INSPIRE].
C. Berger and L.M. Sehgal, PCAC and coherent pion production by low energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 053003 [arXiv:0812.2653] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Ahrens et al., Measurement of neutrino-proton and anti-neutrino-proton elastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 785 [INSPIRE].
C.H. Llewellyn Smith, Neutrino Reactions at Accelerator Energies, Phys. Rept. 3 (1972) 261 [INSPIRE].
J. Nieves, J.E. Amaro and M. Valverde, Inclusive quasi-elastic neutrino reactions, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 055503 [Erratum ibid. 72 (2005) 019902] [nucl-th/0408005] [INSPIRE].
C. Berger and L.M. Sehgal, Lepton mass effects in single pion production by neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 113004 [arXiv:0709.4378] [INSPIRE].
J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo and M.J. Vicente Vacas, Inclusive Charged–Current Neutrino–Nucleus Reactions, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 045501 [arXiv:1102.2777] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Paschos and J.Y. Yu, Neutrino interactions in oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 033002 [hep-ph/0107261] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
E.L. Snider and G. Petrillo, LArSoft: Toolkit for Simulation, Reconstruction and Analysis of Liquid Argon TPC Neutrino Detectors, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898 (2017) 042057 [INSPIRE].
GEANT4 collaboration, GEANT4: a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250 [INSPIRE].
M. Miyajima et al., Average energy expended per ion pair in liquid argon, Phys. Rev. A 9 (1974) 1438 [INSPIRE].
ICARUS collaboration, Study of electron recombination in liquid argon with the ICARUS TPC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 523 (2004) 275 [INSPIRE].
I. De Bonis et al., LBNO-DEMO: Large-scale neutrino detector demonstrators for phased performance assessment in view of a long-baseline oscillation experiment, arXiv:1409.4405 [INSPIRE].
P. Cennini et al., Performance of a 3-ton liquid argon time projection chamber, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 345 (1994) 230 [INSPIRE].
Y. Li et al., Measurement of Longitudinal Electron Diffusion in Liquid Argon, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 816 (2016) 160 [arXiv:1508.07059] [INSPIRE].
DarkSide collaboration, Electroluminescence pulse shape and electron diffusion in liquid argon measured in a dual-phase TPC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 904 (2018) 23 [arXiv:1802.01427] [INSPIRE].
M. Abadi et al., TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdf.
F. Chollet et al., Keras, https://keras.io.
DUNE collaboration, Prospects for Beyond the Standard Model Physics Searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, arXiv:2008.12769 [INSPIRE].
G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873 [physics/9711021] [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report. Volume IV: The DUNE far detector single-phase technology, 2020 JINST 15 T08010 [arXiv:2002.03010] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hayato, A neutrino interaction simulation program library NEUT, Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 2477 [INSPIRE].
MINERvA collaboration, First evidence of coherent K+ meson production in neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 061802 [arXiv:1606.08890] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2010.06552
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Alt, C., Radics, B. & Rubbia, A. Neural-network-driven proton decay sensitivity in the p → \( \overline{\nu} \)K+ channel using large liquid argon time projection chambers. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)243
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)243