Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subject area literacy instruction in low SES secondary schools in New Zealand.

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents findings of a study into patterns of literacy achievement and teaching in Year 12 biology, English and mathematics classes from 22 low socio-economic status (SES) secondary schools in New Zealand (NZ). We hypothesised that patterns of literacy teaching in specialised subject areas might contribute to well-documented inequities in education achievement for Māori (indigenous), Pacific Islands and low-SES students in NZ. We analysed participation and pass rates for sets of achievement standards that contribute to the standards based National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA), the main national school qualification (http://www.nzqa. govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/ncea/). These analyses showed that the rates at which students in the low-SES schools in the study participated in, and attained, key high literacy achievement standards were markedly lower than for schools nationally. Literacy instruction data were derived from observations of 104 teachers working with Year 12 (approximately 17 years old) students comprising 28 biology, 39 English and 37 mathematics teachers. Results from the classroom observations indicated that students had comparatively few opportunities to read longer, more complex subject-area texts and that instructional approaches commonly cited in the literature as effective in raising students’ subject area literacy, strategy instruction and extended discussion, were infrequently observed in this study. Infrequent too were teaching about language features (such as nominalisation) in mathematics or biology lessons and teaching to develop students’ critical literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allington, R.L. (2014). How reading volume affects both reading fluency and reading achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alozie, N.M., Moje, E.B. & Krajcik, J.S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A.N., Langer, J.A., Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanases, S.Z. & de Oliveira, L.C. (2014). Scaffolding Versus Routine Support for Latina/o Youth in an Urban School Tensions in Building Toward Disciplinary Literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 263–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, E.H. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biancarosa, C. & Snow, C.E. (2006). Reading next–A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A.R., Berryman, M.A., Wearmouth, J.B. & Peter, M. (2012). Developing an effective education reform model for indigenous and other minoritized students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K. & Beckett, K.L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 40–87. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brozo, W.G., Moorman, G., Meyer, C. & Stewart, T. (2013). Content area reading and disciplinary literacy: A case for the radical center. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(5), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L.M., Grunow, A. & LeMahieu, P.G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking, R.R. & Mestre, J.P. (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, M. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don’t know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGisi, L.L. & Willett, J.B. (1995). What high school biology teachers say about their textbook use: A descriptive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. & Schleppegrell, M.J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenke, S. (2010). Missed Opportunities, Misunderstandings, and Misgivings: A Case Study Analysis of Three Beginning English Teachers’ Attempts at Authentic Discussion With Adolescents in a Synchronous CMC Environment. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 387–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., … Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through conceptoriented reading instruction. Journal of educational psychology, 96(3), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V.A. (2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2013). Critical Literacy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, R., McNaughton, S. & Wilson, A. (2015). Raising literacy levels using digital learning: a design-based approach in New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 26(2) 198–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, M.L., Borman, G.D., Dole, J., Kral, C.C., Salinger, T., and Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A Practice Guide (NCEE #2008–4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.D. & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, I., McKinley, E., Jensen, S. & van der Merwe, A. (2009). Towards university: Navigating NCEA course choices in low-mid decile schools. Auckland: Starpath Project, the University of Auckland. Retrieved from the Starpath Project website, http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/research/starpath-home/starpath-research/towards-university.html

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. & Lai, M.K. (2009). A model of school change for culturally and linguistically diverse students in New Zealand: a summary and evidence from systematic replication. Teaching Education, 20(1), 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. & Wright, N. (2007). Secondary literacy across the curriculum: Challenges and possibilities. Language and Education, 21(5), 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C.R. & Patel, N.R. (1983). A Network Algorithm for Performing Fisher’s Exact Test in r × c Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(382), 427–434. http://doi.org/10.2307/2288652

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum: Learning Media, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (n.d.). New Zealand Education: Deciles. Retrieved from: http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/SchoolOperations/Resourcing/OperationalFunding/Deciles.aspx.

  • Moje, E. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N. & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E., Stockdill, D., Kim, K. & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In Kamil, M.L., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B. & Afflerbach, P. (Eds.). (2011).Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D.W., Bean, T.W., Birdyshaw, D. & Rycik, J.A. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(1), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S.B. & McCormick, S. (Eds.). (1995). Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Qualifications Authority (n.d., a). NCEA. Retrieved from the NZQA website, http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/ncea/.

  • New Zealand Qualifications Authority (n.d., b). NCEA. Fact Sheet 4. Retrieved from the NZQA website, http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/ncea/understanding-ncea/the-facts/factsheet-4/.

  • O’Brien, D.G., Stewart, R.A. & Moje, E.A. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 442–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming social background: Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do–Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I, Revised edition). OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D. (2013). Research foundations of the Common Core State Standards in English language arts. In S. Neuman and L. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality reading instruction in the age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 237–262). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T.L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent Literacy Research and Practice (pp. 415). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Hurwitz, L. & Cziko, C. (1999). Reading for understanding: A guide to improving reading in middle and high school classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C. & Murphy, L. (2012). Reading for understanding: How Reading Apprenticeship improves disciplinary learning in secondary and college classrooms (Second ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C. (2012). What Is Disciplinary Literacy and Why Does it Matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a State Services Commission (2013). Better Public Services: Boosting skills and employment. Wellington: State Services Commission. Retrieved from: http://www.ssc.govt.nz/bps-boosting-skills-employment#result5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, A.W. (2008). Toward a more anatomically complete model of literacy instruction: A focus on African American male adolescents and texts. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telford, M. & May, S. (2010). PISA 2009: Our 21st century learners at age 15. Wellington, New Zealand: Comparative Education Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannier, D.M. (2012). Primary and secondary school science education in New Zealand (Aotearoa)–Policies and practices for a better future. Wellington: Fulbright New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, S.A. (2013). Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20 (3): 178–208. doi:10.1080/09296174.2013.799918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2012). Mining the Text: 34 Text Features That Can Ease or Obstruct Text Comprehension and Use. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, I.A. & Son, E.H. (2011). A Dialogic Turn in Research on Learning and Teaching to Comprehend Handbook of reading research (Vol. iv, pp. 359–387). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., Jesson, R., Rosedale, N. & Cockle, V. (2012). Literacy and language pedagogy within subject areas in years 7–11. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/-Secondary_Literacy/Literacy_and_Language_Pedagogy

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., Madjar, I. & McNaughton, S. (2016). Opportunity to learn about disciplinary literacy in senior secondary English classrooms in New Zealand. The Curriculum Journal, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Woolf Fisher Research Centre, Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Aaron Wilson, Stuart McNaughton & Tong Zhu

Authors
  1. Aaron Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart McNaughton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, A., McNaughton, S. & Zhu, T. Subject area literacy instruction in low SES secondary schools in New Zealand.. AJLL 40, 72–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651985

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651985

Search

Navigation