Skip to main content

The Implementation of Scientific Literacy as Basic Skills in Norway After the School Reform of 2006

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education

Abstract

In 2006, Norway implemented a new curriculum, which introduced basic literacy skills in every school subject. In this new curriculum, the basic skills are considered fundamental to learning in every school subject. As a consequence, since 2006, Norwegian teachers and school leaders have been grappling with how to develop and teach writing, reading, and oral communication as an integrated part of disciplinary education. Several initiatives have sought to develop literacy in school science since the introduction of the curriculum. However, teachers and school leaders are generally somewhat hesitant to explicitly address basic skills in the classroom. Some communities of teachers who discuss the purposes and qualities of writing have nonetheless been successfully established in Norway. We will discuss two approaches for the implementation of the curriculum reform. The first is based on first language (L1) literacy research, considering literacy as a general competence, however with a strong emphasis on writing in the disciplines. The second is from the science education community, with its emphasis on scientific literacy. Some of the major projects in Norway have focused on the intersection between the basic literacy skills and the process dimension of science in the main area “The Budding Researcher” in the new curriculum. We conclude that these two approaches each have their own strengths for developing scientific literacy and the basic skills introduced in the curriculum. Together, they offer opportunities for considering basic skills as both generic and discipline-specific, and for developing a metalanguage for discussing and reflecting on the teaching and learning of school science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berge, K. L., & Skar, G. (2015). Ble elevene bedre skrivere? Intervensjonseffekter på elevers skriveferdigheter og skriveutvikling [Did the students become better writers? Intervention effects on students’ writing skills and development]. Report 2 from the NORM project. Retrieved from http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/uv/ils/PPU3220/h16/ble-elevene-bedre-skrivere.pdf

  • Bjønness, B., & Kolstø, S. D. (2015). Scaffolding open inquiry: How a teacher provides students with structure and space. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(3), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byhring, A. K., & Knain, E. (2016). Intertextuality for handling complex environmental issues. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyum, K. H., & Hertzberg, F. (2011). Skriv i alle fag! Argumentasjon og kildebruk i videregående skole [Write in every school subject! Argumentation and use of sources in upper secondary school]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilje, Ø., Ingulfsen, L., Dolonen, J., Furberg, A., Rasmussen, I., Kluge, A., et al (2016). Med ARK&APP. Bruk av læremidler og ressurser for læring på tvers av arbeidsformer [Use of learning resources for learning across teaching practices]. Report. University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, B., & Ødegaard, M. (2014). From words to concepts: Focusing on word knowledge when teaching for conceptual understanding within an inquiry-based science setting. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 777–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, F. (2010). Arbeid med grunnleggende ferdigheter [Working on basic skills]. In E. Ottesen & J. Möller (Eds.), Underveis, men i svært ulikt tempo. Et blikk inn i ti skoler etter tre år med Kunnskapsløftet. Oslo: NIFU/STEP Rapport 37/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, F., & Roe, A. (2015). Writing in the content areas: A Norwegian case study. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knain, E. (2015). Scientific literacy for participation: A systemic functional approach to analysis of school science discourses. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maagerø, E., & Skjelbred, D. (2010). De mangfoldige realfagstekstene: Om lesing og skriving i matematikk og naturfag [A multitude of science texts. On reading and writing in mathematics and science]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matre, S., & Solheim, R. (2015). Writing education and assessment in Norway: Toward shared understanding, shared language and shared responsibility. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 15, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestad, I., & Kolstø, S. D. (2014). Using the concept of ZPD to explore the challenges of and opportunities in designing discourse activities based on practical work. Science Education, 98(6), 1054–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2004). Kultur for læring [Culture for learning]. Stortingsmelding 30 (2003–2004). Oslo: Utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Kunnskapsløftet - Knowledge promotion. Information for pupils and parents/guardians. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kilde/kd/bro/2006/0002/ddd/pdfv/292311-kunnskapsloftet2006_engelsk_ii.pdf.

  • Mork, S. M. (2013). Revidert læreplan i naturfag. Økt fokus på grunnleggende ferdigheter og forskerspiren 8 [Revised curriculum in science. Icreased attention to basic skills and the Budding researcher]. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 9(2), 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for basic skills. To use for subject curricula groups appointed by the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/contentassets/fd2d6bfbf2364e1c98b73e030119bd38/framework_for_basic_skills.pdf

  • Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Official Norwgian Reports - NOU (2003). I første rekke. Forsterket kvalitet i en grunnopplæring for alle [First in line. Strenghtened quality in primary and secondary school] (Vol. 16): Statens forvaltningstjeneste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rødnes, K., & Gilje, Ø. (2016). Grunnleggende ferdigheter: På tvers eller i fag? [Basic skills: Across or within school subjects?] Retrieved from http://www.uv.uio.no/iped/forskning/prosjekter/ark-app/rodnes_gilje_ark_app_grf_2016.pdf

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivesind, K. (2012). Kunnskapsløftet: Implementering av nye læreplaner i reformen. Synteserapport fra evalueringen av Kunnskapsløftet [Knowledge promotion: The implementation of new curricula in the reform]. Acta Didactica, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, J., Solheim, R., & Aasen, A. J. (Eds.). (2011). På sporet av god skriveopplæring - ei bok for lærere i alle fag [Developing good teaching of writing—a book for teachers in every school subject]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solheim, R., & Matre, S. (2014). Forventninger om skrivekompetanse. Perspektiver på skriving, skriveopplæring og vurdering i «Normprosjektet» [Expectations on writing skills. Perspectives on writing, teaching of writing and assessment in the “Normproject”]. Viden om læsning, 15, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørvik, G. O., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). “Do Books Like These Have Authors?” New Roles for Text and New Demands on Students in Integrated Science-Literacy Instruction. Science Education, 99(1), 39–69. doi:10.1002/sce.21143.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2016). Natural science subject curriculum. Basic skills. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/kl06/NAT1-03/Hele/Grunnleggende_ferdigheter?lplang=eng

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Knain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knain, E., Ødegaard, M. (2018). The Implementation of Scientific Literacy as Basic Skills in Norway After the School Reform of 2006. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics