Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon isotope discrimination and salt tolerance of rice genotypes

  • Physiology
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rice genotypes were evaluated for salt tolerance in a greenhouse based upon stable carbon isotope analysis under salt stress (EC = 8 dSm−1) and non-stressed (1 dSm−1) conditions. Ten seedlings from each replicate and genotype were randomly sampled at 25 or 33 days after sowing (DAS). Values for carbon isotope discrimination (A) were obtained from dried and homogenized seedling tissue of twelve genotypes. Rice genotypes were ranked from high to low salt tolerance based on whole plant average maximum A of these two salt levels at these two early growth stages. Differences in fractionation among genotypes were observed at 25 and 33 DAS. Fractionation effects of salinity stress on A were significantly different among genotypes at 33 DAS, but not at 25 DAS. The salt tolerant cultivar maintained significantly higher average flag leaf tissue A than did the sensitive cultivar. Flag leaves of salt stressed rice maintained higher A than predicted for these two genotypes based a theoretical A value. The lack of greater reductions in leaf tissue A of salt stressed rice genotypes may the result of an increased contribution of respired carbon to the total carbon budget of rice leaves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asch, F., M. Dingkuhn, and K. Dorffling. 2000. Salinity increases CO2 assimilation but reduces growth in field-grown irrigated rice. Plant Soil 218:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, R., S. S. M. Naqvi, A. N. Khanzada, and K. T. Hubick. 1998. Carbon-isotope discrimination in wheat under saline conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 30:87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, A. G., R. A. Richards, G. J. Rebetzke, and G. D. Farquhar. 2002. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 42:122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, G. D. and J. Lloyd. 1993. Carbon and oxygen isotope effects in the exchange of carbon dioxide between terrestrial plants and the atmosphere. In Stable Carbon Isotopes and Plant Carbon-Water Relations. Eds. J. R. Ehleringer, A. E. Hall and J. D. Farquhar. Academic Press, London, pp 47–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, G. D., J. R. Ehleringer, and K. T. Hubick. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40:503–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillion, J. S. and H. Griffiths. 1997. The influence of (photo)respiration on carbon isotope discrimination in plants. Plant Cell Env. 20:1217–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, S. and A. Caplan. 1998. Products of proline catabolism can induce osmotically regulated genes in rice. Plant Physiol. 116:203–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinkina, C. G. and T. M. Udel’nova. 1990. Effect of photorespiration on fractionation of stable carbon isotopes in a marine Chlorella. Fiziologiya Rastenii (Moscow) 37:96–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreto, F., D. Sebastiano, and G. Di Marco. 1999. Estimation of photorespiratory carbon dioxide recycling during photosynthesis. Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 26(8):733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreto, F., M. Centrillo, and K. Chartzoulakis. 2003. Photosynthetic limitations in olive cultivars with different sensitivity to salt stress. Plant Cell Env. 26:595–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutts, S., J. M. Kinet, and J. Bouharmont. 1996. Effects of salt stress on growth, mineral nutrition and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes differing in salinity resistance. Plant Growth Reg. 19:207–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menédez, C. M., and A. E. Hall. 1996. Heritability of carbon isotope discrimination and correlations with harvest index in cowpea. Crop Sci. 36:233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poss, J. A., S. R. Grattan, D. L. Suarez, and C. M. Grieve. 2000. Stable carbon isotope discrimination: an indicator of cumulative salinity and boron stress in Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Tree Physiol. 20:1121–1127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetzke, G. J., A. G. Condon, R. A. Richards, and G. D. Farquhar. 2002. Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci. 42(3): 739–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeske, C. A., O’Leary, M. H. 1984. Carbon isotope effects on the enzyme-catalyzed carboxylation of ribulose bisphosphate. Biochemistry. 23:6275–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Diaz, M., J. L. Garcia, M. C. Antolin, and J. L. Araus. 2002. Effects of soil drought and atmospheric humidity on yield, gas exchange, and stable carbon isotope composition of barley. Photosynthetica. 40:415–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1987. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L. M. C. Shannon, and C. M. Grieve. 2002. Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic parameters. Euphytica 127:235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., J. A. Poss, C. Wilson, A. S. E. Draz, G. B. Gregorio, and C. M. Grieve. 2003. Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by physiological characters. Euphytica 129:281–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Poss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poss, J.A., Zeng, L. & Grieve, C.M. Carbon isotope discrimination and salt tolerance of rice genotypes. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 32, 339–346 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543319

Navigation