Abstract
Objective: This research examined how public perceptions of the relationship between poverty and health predict support for poverty-related policies.
Methods: A random sample of 1,203 Albertans were interviewed by telephone to determine their perceptions of the relationship between poverty and health (myth, drift, behavioural, structural), and their support for government spending in six poverty-related policy areas: nutrition programs, housing, child care, increased welfare allowance, wage subsidies, and recreation programs.
Results: The greatest support was for child care programs, with the least support for increased welfare allowance. The degree of support for all policies except wage subsidies and recreation programs differed by the explanation chosen of the relationship between poverty and health. Those who chose a structural explanation were more likely to support government spending than those who chose a behavioural explanation.
Interpretation: Beliefs about the relationship between poverty and health influence support for policies. Public health professionals have a role in increasing public awareness of the structural factors that influence health.
Résumé
Objectif: Étudier les perceptions publiques du lien entre la pauvreté et la santé comme prédicteurs de l’appui aux politiques de lutte contre la pauvreté.
Méthode: Entretiens téléphoniques avec un échantillon aléatoire de 1 203 Albertains pour déterminer leur perception du lien (mythique, dérivé, comportemental ou structurel) entre la pauvreté et la santé et leur appui aux dépenses publiques dans six secteurs liés à la pauvreté: les programmes alimentaires, le logement, l’aide à l’enfance, la hausse des allocations d’aide sociale, les subventions salariales et les programmes de loisirs.
Résultats: Les programmes d’aide à l’enfance ont reçu le plus d’appui, et la hausse des allocations d’aide sociale, le moins d’appui. Sauf pour les subventions salariales et les programmes de loisirs, le niveau d’appui accordé différait selon l’explication choisie du lien entre la pauvreté et la santé. Les personnes ayant privilégié l’explication structurelle avaient plus tendance à appuyer les dépenses publiques que celles ayant choisi l’explication comportementale.
Interprétation: Les convictions au sujet du lien entre la pauvreté et la santé influencent l’appui aux politiques. Les professionnels de la santé publique ont donc un rôle à jouer pour sensibiliser le public aux facteurs structurels qui influencent la santé.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Federal, Provincial, Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health [ACPH]. Strategies for population health: Investing in the health of Canadians. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 1994.
Federal, Provincial, Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health [ACPH]. Report on the health of Canadians. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1996.
World Health Organization. The Jakarta Declaration on Health Promotion into the 21st Century, 1997. Available online: http://www.dnttm.ro/arspms/jakarta.html.
Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (Eds.). Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? The Determinants of Health of Populations. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1994.
Marmot M, Wilkinson R (Eds.). Social Determinants of Health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999.
National Council of Welfare. Poverty Profile 1998. Volume #113. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.
Raphael D. From increasing poverty to societal disintegration: How economic inequality affects the health of individuals and communities. In: Armstrong P, Armstrong H, Coburn D (Eds.). Unhealthy Times: Political Economy Perspectives on Health and Care in Canada. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2000;223–46.
Ross D, Roberts P. Income and Child Wellbeing: A New Perspective on the Poverty Debate. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development, 1999.
Wilkins R. Mortality by neighbourhood income in urban Canada, 1986–1991. Poster presented at the Conference of the Canadian Society for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CSEB), St. John’s, Newfoundland, 1995.
Lipps G, Frank J. The social context of school for young children. Canadian Social Trends 1997;47:22–26.
National Council of Welfare. Healthy Parents, Healthy Babies. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1997.
Federal, Provincial, Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health [ACPH]. Toward a Healthy Future. Second Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1999.
Canadian Public Health Association [CPHA]. Health Impacts of Social and Economic Conditions: Implications for Public Policy. Ottawa: Author, 1997.
National Forum on Health. Canada Health Action: Building on the Legacy. Synthesis Reports and Issues Papers. Volume, II. Ottawa: Author, 1997.
Burstein P. Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy. Social Forces 1998;77(1):27–63.
Cook F, Barrett E. Support for the American Welfare State: The Views of Congress and the Public. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
Page B, Shapiro R. Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Review 1983;77:175–90.
Sharp E. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999.
Kluegel J, Mason D, Wegener B (Eds.). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-communist States. New York: DeGruyter, 1995.
Stimson J, Mackuen M, Erikson R. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review 1995;89:543–65.
Jordan B. A Theory of Poverty and Social Exclusion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
Department of Health and Social Security. Inequalities in Health: Report of a Research Working Group (The Black Report). London: Department of Health and Social Security, 1980.
MacIntyre S. The Black Report and beyond: What are the issues. Soc Sci Med 1997;44(6):723–45.
Fox J, Benzeval M. Perspectives on social variations in health. In: Benzeval M, Judge K, Whitehead M (Eds.), Tackling Inequalities in Health: An Agenda for Action. London, UK: King’s Fund, 1995;10–21.
Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge, 1996.
Kawachi I, Kennedy B, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1491–98.
Reutter L, Neufeld A, Harrison, MJ. Public perceptions of the relationship between poverty and health. Can J Public Health 1999;90:13–18.
Bobo L. Social responsibility, individualism, and redistributive policies. Sociological Forum 1991;6:71–91.
Groskind F. Ideological influences on public support for assistance to poor families. Social Work 1994;39(1):81–89.
Jacoby W. Public attitudes toward government spending. Am J Political Science 1994;38:336–61.
Gilens M. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Hasenfeld Y, Rafferty J. The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces 1989;67(4):1027–48.
Dennis D. The 1999 Alberta Survey Sampling Report. Edmonton, Alberta: Population Research Laboratory, University of Alberta, 2000.
Heclo H. Values underpinning poverty programs for children. The Future of Children 1997;7(2):141–48.
Peters S. Exploring Canadian Values: Foundations for Well-Being. CPRN Study No. F-01. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks, Inc., 1995.
Sanders A. Rationality, self-interest, and public attitudes on public spending. Soc Sci Q 1988;69:311–24.
McGrath S. Child poverty advocacy and the politics of influence. In: Pulkingham J, Ternowetsky G (Eds.), Child and Family Policies. Halifax: Fernwood, 1997;172–87.
National Council of Welfare. Welfare Incomes 1997 and 1998. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1999–2000.
Sabatier P. Policy change over a decade or more. In: Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H (Eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993;13–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Acknowledgements: This research was funded by Support for the Advancement of Scholarship Small Faculties Research Grant, University of Alberta, and Social Sciences Research Operating Grant, University of Alberta. We thank Diane Dennis, MSc, for research assistance on this project. We also acknowledge the support of the Population Research Laboratory, Department of Sociology, University of Alberta.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reutter, L.I., Harrison, M.J. & Neufeld, A. Public Support for Poverty-related Policies. Can J Public Health 93, 297–302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405021
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405021