Skip to main content
Log in

Social responsibility, individualism, and redistributive policies

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Previous research supports the “consensus on individualism” hypothesis, which holds that most Americans value hard work and self-reliance, perceive an open opportunity structure, and as a result, oppose redistributive policies, whether targeted by race or designed to help the poor in general. In contrast, this paper shows that one form of egalitarianism, a sense of social responsibility, remains a potent American value. Factor analysis of 18 stratification belief items from the 1984 General Social Survey results in two dimensions—one involving social responsibility and the other economic individualism. Social responsibility is the more powerful predictor of redistributive policy attitudes. Individuals who place a higher priority on social responsibility than on individualism are more likely than those with the opposite priorities to support redistributive policies, but are also disproportionately low income, black, and less politically active. These results suggest that economic individualism appears a hegemonic value in the United States partly because of the lack of political influence and low socioeconomic status of those most committed to social responsibility beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apostle, Richard., Charles Y. Glock, Thomas Piazza, andMarijean Suzelze 1983 The Anatomy of Racial Attitudes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert 1948 “Public opinion and public opinion polling.” American Sociological Review 13:542–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Whites' opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or relatistic group conflict?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:1196–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988a “Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes.” In P. A. Katz and D. A. Taylor (eds.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy: 85–114. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988b “Attitudes toward the black political movement: Trends, meaning, and effects on racial policy preferences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 51:287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean 1982 The Current Crisis in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, Richard M. 1979 “Social policy and ideology: Public opinion in eight nations.” In R. Tomarson (ed.), Comparative Social Research, vol. 2:3–40. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James A. andTom W. Smith 1986 General Social Survey, 1972–1986, Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, Joe R. 1972 “America's welfare stereotypes.” Socical Science Quarterly 52:921–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Stanley 1984 “Economic individualism and American public opinion.” American Politics Quarterly 11:3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. andAndre Modigliani 1987 “The changing culture of affirmative action.” In R. G. Braungart and M. M. Braungart (eds.), Research in Political Sociology: 137–177. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J. 1987 Middle American Individualism: The Future of Liberal Democracy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Max and Franz Hollinger 1986 “Perceptions and ideologies of inequality in advanced capitalist societies: A comparison of attitudes in Western Germany and the United States.” Paper presented at the 1986 meetings of the Research Committee on Social Stratification of the International Sociological Association.*

  • Hamilton, Richard F. 1972 Class and Politics in the United States. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1981 What's Fair: American Beliefs About Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joan andWilliam H. Form 1973 Income and Ideology: An Analysis of the American Political Formula. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, Mary R. andMichael J. Muha 1984 “Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial tolerance, or ideological refinement.” American Sociological Review 49:751–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, Karl G. andDag Sorbom 1984 LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Mooresville, ID: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. andJ. Caffrey 1965 “Alpha Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 30:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Irwin andR. Glenn Hass 1988 “Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:893–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. 1983 “Diversity and complexity in American public opinion.” In A. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline: 389–425. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. andDavid O. Sears 1981 “Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40:414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, James R. andEliot R. Smith 1986 Beliefs About Inequality. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Frank 1987 Dollars and Dreams. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin 1979 The First New Nation. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin and William Schneider 1978 “The Bakke case: How would it be decided at the bar of public opinion?” Public Opinion March/April:38–48.

  • Mann, Michael 1970 “The social cohesion of liberal democracy.” American Sociological Review 35:423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Karl U., Vered Kraus, and Peter Schmidt 1981 “Opportunity and inequality: Exploratory analyses of the structure of attitudes towards stratification for West Germany.” Paper presented at the 1981 meetings of the International Political Science Association.

  • McCloskey, Hebert andJohn Zaller 1984 The American Ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, Ann Shola andTheda Skocpol 1984 “Why not equal protection?: Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920.” American Sociological Review 49:726–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Robert V. 1983 “Explaining perceptions of class and racial inequality in England and the United States of America.” British Journal of Sociology 34:344–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton 1973 The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O. 1988 “Symbolic racism.” In P. A. Katz and D. A. Taylor (eds.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy: 53–84. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Robert Y. 1986 “The dynamics of public opinion toward social welfare policy.” Paper presented at the American Political Sciences Association Meetings, Washington, D.C.

  • Sniderman, Paul M. andMichael G. Hagen 1985 Race and Inequality. Chatham, NJ: Chatham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969 Democracy in America. (1835*) New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanneman, Reeve andLynn Weber Cannon 1987 The American Perception of Class. Phildelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, andNorman H. Nie 1972 Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robin M., Jr. 1979 “Change and stability in values and value systems: A sociological perspective.” In M. Rokeach (ed.), Understanding Human Values: 15–46. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John B. 1974 “The stigma of public dependency: A comparison of alternative forms of public aid to the poor.” Social Problems 21:213–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bobo, L. Social responsibility, individualism, and redistributive policies. Sociol Forum 6, 71–92 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112728

Key words

Navigation