Abstract
Keplerian dynamics usually dictates the orbital configuration for a space mission. The fulfillment of special requirements, however, could demand that a spacecraft maintains a certain distance from the position of Keplerian equilibrium. This can be true for low Earth orbits and for three-body problems. The natural equilibrium position can be occupied by another satellite or it can be simply a reference orbiting point. Such a non-keplerian configuration, also called artificial equilibrium, can be maintained only if continuous thrust — provided by low specific impulse motors or solar sails — is applied. In the present paper, the maps identifying the equi-thrust regions for the two- and the three-body problem are reported. Once the space regions requiring a defined value of the thrust (in module) are detected, a control strategy for moving from an artificial equilibrium to a different one without changing the thrust level is proposed. In such an approach, therefore, the orbital maneuver is accomplished by means of an attitude change only, allowing for a remarkable simplification of the guidance and control systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. B. Palmerini, M. Sabatini, D. Pavarin, M. Manente “Controlled Orbital Dynamics of Low Altitude Formations by means of Electric Propulsion”, Advance in Astronautical Sciences, 129, 2461–2476, 2008.
M. Y. Morimoto, H. Yamakawa, K. Uesugi, “Artificial Equilibrium Points in the Low-Thrust Restricted Three-Body Problem”, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 30, 5, 2007.
C.R. McInnes, “Displaced non-Keplerian orbits using impulsive thrust”, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 110, pp. 259–315, 2011.
M. Y. Morrmoto, H. Yamakawa, K. Uesugi, “Periodic Orbits with Low-Thrust Propulsion in the Restricted Three-Body Problem”, Jouurnal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 29, 5, 2006.
C.R. McInnes, “Artificial Three-Body Equilibria for Hybrid Low-Thrust Propulsion”, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 31, 6, 2008.
G. Aliasi, G. Mengali, A. A. Quarta, “Artificial Equilibrium Points for Electric Sail with Constant Attitude”, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 50, 6, 2013.
R. L. Forward. “Statite: A Spacecraft That Does Not Orbit”. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 28, 5, 606–611, 1991.
S. Sgubini, S. Porfili, C. Circi “Polar Sitter Mission for Continuous Observation of the Poles”, Applied and Industrial Mathematics in Italy II: pp. 549–560, 2007.
J. D. Cunningham, H.J. Bloom, C.S. Nelson. “The National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System: meeting Future User Needs for Earth System Observations”, Weather and Environmental Satellites-Proceedings of the SPIE, 5549, 1–10, 2004.
D. J. Grebow, M. T. Ozimek, K. C. Howell, “Advanced modeling of optimal low-thrust lunar pole-sitter trajectories. Acta Astronautica, 67:7–8, 991–1001, 2008.
J. Heiligers, M. Macdonald, J. S. Parker, “Extension of Earth-Moon libration point orbits with solar sail propulsion”, Astrophysics and Space Scieinces, 361, 240–259, 2016.
W.H. Clohessy, R.S. Wiltshire, “Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous”, Journal of Aerospace Sciences, 27, 9, pp. 653–658, 1960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabatini, M., Sgubini, S. & Palmerini, G.B. Artificial Equilibrium Orbital Configurations by Means of Continuous Thrust. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 95, 145–152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404723
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404723