Skip to main content
Log in

Depression of pyrite flotation by yeast and bacteria

  • Biobenefication
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microorganisms, such as the bacteria Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, have been reported to depress pyrite flotation (Elzeky and Attia, 1987; Atkins, 1990). However, the dependence of the depression on the type of organism or on suspension pH is still being determined. In this study, the relative effectiveness of various microorganisms (chemolithotrophic bacteria, chemoorganotrophic bacteria and yeast) over the pH range of 2 to 12 was studied. Screening tests using microflotation showed that every microorganism tested was capable of depressing naturally hydrophobic pyrite at acidic pH. Larger-scale experiments with both mineral pyrite and coal pyrite using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as depressants, showed that these microorganisms are very effective depressants for mineral pyrite at acid pH, but they are largely ineffective at neutral and alkaline pH, where the mineral pyrite surface is not naturally hydrophobic. The flotation response of the coal pyrite was completely different from the mineral pyrite. The coal pyrite was most floatable near neutral pH, with the floatability decreasing in acidic or alkaline solutions. Depression of the coal pyrite by yeast was not selective between the pyrite and the associated coal under the experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, A.S., 1990, “Developments in the biological suppression of pyritic sulfur in coal flotation,” Bioprocessing and Biotreatment of Coa., D.L. Wise, ed., Marcel Dekker, NY, pp. 507–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, A.S., Bridgewood, E.W., Davis, A.J., and Pooley, F.D., 1987, “A study of the suppression of pyritic sulfur in coal froth flotation by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans,” Coal Preparatio., Vol. 5, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A.F., and Miller, K.J., 1971, “Hydrolyzed Metal Ions as Pyrite Depressants in Coal Flotation: A Laboratory Study,” US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations, RI 7518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T.D., Smith, D.W., and Madigan, M.T., 1984, Biology of Microorganisms., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capes, C.E., Mcllhinney, A.E., Sirianni, A.F., and Puddington, I.E., 1973, “Bacterial oxidation in upgrading pyritic coals,” CIM Bulletin, November, pp. 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander, S., and Apian, F.F., 1990, “Surface and Electrochemical Studies in Coal Cleaning,” Final Report, US Department of Energy, DOE/PC/80523-T11 (D. 9000-7603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisele, T.C., 1992, “Coal Desulfurization by Bacterial Treatment and Column Flotation,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzeky, M., and Attia, Y.A., 1987, “Coal slurry desulfurization by flotation using thiophilic bacteria for pyrite depression,” Coal Preparation, Vol. 5, pp. 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbut, C.S., and Klein, C., 1977, Manual of Mineralogy, 19th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawatra, S.K., Eisele, T.C., and Johnson, H., 1991, “Recovery of liberated pyrite in coal flotation: entrainment or hydrophobicity?”, Processing and Utilization of High-Sulfur Coals I., Dugan, Quigley and Attia, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A.J., Johnson, N.W., Manlapig, E.V., and Thome, C.G., 1981, Mineral and Coal Flotation Circuits: Their Simulation and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmura, N., Kitamura, K., and Saiki, H., 1993, “Mechanism of Microbial Flotation Using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for pyrite suppression,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 14, pp. 671–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, C.E., and Apian, F.F., 1991, “Effect of feed particle size and reagents on coal-mineral matter selectivity during the flotation of bituminous coals,” Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainthorpe, A.C., 1989, “An investigation of the efficacy of biological additives for the suppression of pyritic sulfur during simulated froth flotation of coal,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 33, pp. 694–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenen, J.G., and Bos, P., 1989, “Habitats and ecological niches of chemolitho(auto)trophic bacteria,” Autotrophic Bacteria, Shlegel and Bovien, eds., Science Tech Publishers, Madison, WI, pp. 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, C.C., and Atkins, A.S., 1986, “Comparative coal fines desulphurization using the iron oxidising bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidan. and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisia. during simulated froth flotation,” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, C.C., Atkins, A.S., and Davis, A.J., 1987, “Suppression of pyritic sulfur during flotation tests using the bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 30, p. 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, O.H., and Kelly, D.P., 1973, “Studies of the growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans,” Arch. Mikrobiol., Vol. 88, pp. 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, H.F., and Taylor, J.A., 1935, “Froth Flotation of Coal — Sulfur and Ash Reduction,” US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations, RI 3263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R.E., 1979, “Froth flotation,” Coal Preparation, J.W. Leonard, ed., AIME, New York, Chapter 10, Part 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawatra, S.K., Eisele, T.C. Depression of pyrite flotation by yeast and bacteria. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 16, 1–5 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403227

Keywords

Navigation