Abstract
This article explores the dynamics of power-sharing between teacher and students in learning and teaching situations, and describes the theoretical bases, implementation, and results of an empirical study in three elementary schools in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Findings from 58 class observations and interviews with 50 students, 25 teachers, and three school principals suggest that teachers can empower students by acknowledging their right to and responsibility for learning and by sharing power with students. Power-sharing classroom practice requires the dual efforts of teachers and students, and can be facilitated by the teachers’ interactive teaching mode, students’ cooperation and willingness to engage in learning, and school policy and culture, etc. In the power-sharing classrooms, teachers played the role of facilitators and students played as collaborators. In this article, theoretical implications for understanding power-sharing and critical pedagogy are discussed. The empirical evidence from this Hong Kong study contributes to an understanding of teacher-initiated power-sharing in the Chinese context, and the practice of critical pedagogy in classrooms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Apple, M. W., & Beane, J. A. (1999). Lessons from democratic schools. In M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (Eds.), Democratic schools: Lessons from the chalk face (pp. 118–123). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Blackledge, D. C., & Hunt, B. J. (1985). Sociological interpretations of education. London, England: Croom Helm.
Breunig, M. (2005). Turning experiential education and critical pedagogy theory into praxis. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 106–122. doi: 10.1177/105382590502800205
Breunig, M. (2011). Problematizing critical pedagogy. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 2–23.
Ceng, H. L. (2012). 新课改视域课堂权力结构研究 [Studies on classroom power from the new curriculum reform perspective], 中国电力教育 [China Electric Power Education], (28), 42–43.
Cheng, R. H. M. (2004). Moral education in Hong Kong: Confucian-parental, Christian-religious and liberal-civic influences. Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 533–551. doi: 10.1080/0305724042000315626
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon, England & New York, NY: Routledge.
Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (1997). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of conflict and power. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 541–553. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)85542-4
Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, China: Author.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.
Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans., 1st American ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans., New Rev. ed.). London, England: Penguin Books.
Gallagher, C. W. (2002). Radical departures: Composition and progressive pedagogy. Refiguring English studies. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Garman, N. B. (1995). The schizophrenic rhetoric of school reform and the effects on teacher development. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development (pp. 23–38). London, England: Cassell.
Giroux, H. (1988). Literacy and the pedagogy of voice and political empowerment. Educational Theory, 38(1), 61–75. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1988.00061.x
Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for democratic schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 213–239.
Gore, J. M. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gore, J. M. (1995). On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(2), 165–88. doi: 10.1080/0962021950050203
Gore, J. M. (2002, December). Some certainties in the uncertain world of classroom practice: An outline of a theory of power relations in pedagogy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.
Han, Z. (2008). 浅议在新课程改革背景下建立和谐的师生关系 [Establishing harmonious teacher-student relationships in a post curriculum reform era]. 黑龙江教育学院学报 [Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education], 27(3), 87–89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7836.2008.03.031
Hittleman, D. R., & Simon, A. J. (2006). Interpreting educational research: An introduction for consumers of research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Ho, I. T. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 99–114). Hong Kong, China: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
Li, S.-Y. (2007). 教育全球化背景下我国课堂中权力与权利的变化 [Changes of power and right in China within the context of educational globalization]. 山西师范大学学报 (社会 科学版) [Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition)], 34(1), 145–148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5957.2007.01.036
Liang, J. X. (1999). 学校的权力关系: — 所本地中学维持纪律的个案硏究 [Power relations in school: Maintaining discipline in a local secondary school] (Unpublished master’s thesis). 香港中文大学, 香港, 中国 [The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China].
Mason, M. (2010). Critical theory and pedagogy. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (6th ed., pp. 133–140). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
McLaren, P. (2000). Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of possibility. In S. Steiner, H. Frank, P. McLaren, & R. Bahruth (Eds.), Freirean pedagogy, praxis and possibilities: Projects for the new millennium (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
McQuillan, P. J. (2005). Possibilities and pitfalls: A comparative analysis of student empowerment. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 639–670. doi:10.3102/00028312042004639
Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107(3), 232–262.
Perumal, J. (2008).. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 381–398. doi:10.1080/00220270701724570
Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London, England: Cassell Educational.
Reeves, D. B. (2008). The learning leader/Leadership for student empowerment. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 84–85.
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Brody-Shamir, S. (2006). Factors related to perceived power usage in schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 445–462. doi:10.1348/000709905X39189
Secretary for Education. (2012). Replies to initial written questions raised by finance committee members in examining the estimates of expenditure 2012–13. Retrieved July 12, 2013, from http://www.reo.gov.hk/pdf/20122013estimates/reo_estimates_1213-e.pdf
Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. E. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1–28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: JAI.
Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Stanier, L. (1997). Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: A module evaluation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(1), 95–98. doi:10.1080/03098269708725413
Sullivan, A. M., & King, L. (1999, April). An investigation into empowering students through cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
To, S.-M. (2006). Using Foucault’s concept of power to analyze school discipline and draw implications for school social work service in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 49(6), 779–790. doi: 10.1177/0020872806070974
Traynor, P. L. (2003). Factors contributing to teacher choice of classroom order strategies. Education, 123(3), 586–599.
Wang, G.-Z. (2006). 均衡课堂教学权力分配的初探 [Probing into the balanced distribution of power in classroom teaching]. 湖南科技学院学报 [Journal of Hunan University of Science and Engineering], 27(11), 58–59.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (E. Fischoff, H. Gerth, C. W. Mills, K. Ferdinand, T. Parsons, & M. Rheinstein, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Winograd, K. (2002). The negotiative dimension of teaching: Teachers sharing power with the less powerful. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 343–362. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00073-7
Wong, M.-Y. (2014). Teacher-student power relations as a reflection of multileveled intertwined interactions. British Journal of Sociology of Education. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.916600.
Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school: An interactionist viewpoint. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wu, Z.-L. (2008). 学生课程权力刍议 [Superficial discussion on students’ curriculum power]. 教育研究月刊 [Journal of Education Research], 165(1), 74–77.
Zhou, N., Lam, S.-F., & Chan, K. C. (2012). The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1162–1174. doi: 10.1037/a0027609
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, MY. A Qualitative Examination of Teacher-Student Power-Sharing in Chinese Classrooms: A Study in Hong Kong. Front Educ China 10, 251–273 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397065
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397065