Skip to main content
Log in

What Drives Publication Productivity in German Business Faculties?

  • Publication Productivity
  • Published:
Schmalenbach Business Review Aims and scope

Abstract

How well universities prosper depends on their reputations, which in turn depend on high-level published research. I investigate German data from Handelsblatt and Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung (CHE) for university business faculties and show that publication productivity is characterized by increasing returns to scale, which stem from the number of professors a university employs, and that a higher ratio of students per professor does not usually hurt productivity. Third-party funds show only a small and weakly signifcant impact. My analysis of the total costs of universities indicates that publications, student education, and contract research all exhibit signifcant economies of scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, James D. and Zvi Griliches (2000), Research Productivity in a System of Universities, in David Encaoua, Bronwyn Hall, Francois Laisney, and Jacques Mairesse (eds.), The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 105–140.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn, Heinz, Harald Dyckhoff, and Roland Gilles (2007), Datenaggregation zur Leistungsbeurteilung durch Ranking: Vergleich der CHE-und DEA-Methodik sowie Ableitung eines Kompromissansatzes, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 77 (6), 615–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albach, Horst (1985), Lehre und Forschung als Kuppelproduktion, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (8), 862–864.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albers, Sönke (2012), Optimizable and Implementable Aggregate Response Modeling for Marketing Decision Support, International Journal of Research in Marketing 29 (2), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Albers, Sönke and André Bielecki (2012), Wovon hängt die Leistung in Forschung und Lehre ab? Eine Analyse deutscher betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche basierend auf den Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung und des Handelsblatts, Arbeitspapier, Kühne Logistics University, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Backes-Gellner, Uschi and Eva Zanders (1989), Lehre und Forschung als Verbundproduktion. Data-Envelopment-Analysis und organisationsökonomische Interpretationen der Realität in wirtschafts wissenschaftlichen Fachbereichen, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 59 (3), 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baumol, William J., John C. Panzar, and Robert D. Willig (1982), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Yovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berghoff, Sonja, Gero Federkeil, Petra Giebisch, Cort-Denis Hachmeister, Mareike Hennings, Isabel Roessler, and Frank Ziegele (2009), Das Hochschulranking 2009: Vorgehensweise und Indikatoren, Arbeitspapier Nr. 119, Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung, Gütersloh.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bielecki, André and Sönke Albers (2010), DEA with Econometrically Estimated Individual Coeffcients: A Pharmaceutical Sales Force Application, Working Paper, University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonaccorsi, Andrea and Cinzia Daraio (2005), Exploring Size and Agglomeration Effects on Public Research Productivity, Scientometrics 63 (1), 87–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinkman, Paul T. and Larry L. Leslie (1986), Economies of Scale in Higher Education: Sixty Years of Research, Review of Higher Education 10 (1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolli, Thomas and Frank Somogyi (2011), Do Competitively Acquired Funds Induce Universities to Increase Productivity?, Research Policy 40, 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cherchye, Laurens and Piet Vanden Abeele (2005), On Research Effciency: A Micro-Analysis of Dutch University Research in Economics and Business Management, Research Policy 34, 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cleveland, William S. (1979), Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (368), 829–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, Joel E. (1980), Publication Rate as a Function of Laboratory Size in a Biomedical Research Institution, Scientometrics 2 (1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohn, Elchanan, Sherry L.W. Rhine, and Maria C. Santos (1989), Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Forms: Economies of Scale and Scope, Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Charnes, Abraham, William W. Cooper, and Eduardo Rhodes (1978), Measuring the effciency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Groot, Hans, Walter W. McMahon, and J. Fredericks Volkwein (1991), The Cost Structure of American Research Universities, Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (3), 424–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deutscher Hochschulverband (2013), Mehr Studenten, mehr Professoren, schlechteres Betreuungsverhältnis, Forschung & Lehre 20 (1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dilger, Alexander and Harry Müller (2012), A Citation Based Ranking of German Speaking Researchers in Business Administration with Data of Google Scholar, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 82, 1089–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyckhoff, Harald, Sylvia Rassenhövel, Roland Gilles, and Christian Schmitz (2005), Beurteilung der Forschungsleistung und das CHE-Forschungsranking betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 34 (2), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dyckhoff, Harald, Sylvia Rassenhövel, and Kirsten Sandfort (2009), Empirische Produktionsfunktion betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung: Eine Analyse der Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 61, 22–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisend, Martin (2011), Is VHB-JOURQUAL2 a Good Measure of Scientifc Quality? Assessing the Validity of the Major Business Journal Ranking in German-Speaking Countries, BuR–Business Research 4 (2), 241–274.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Groot, Tom and Teresa Garcia-Valderrama (2006), Research Quality and Effciency: An Analysis of Assessments and Management Issues in Dutch Economics and Business Research Programs, Research Policy 35 (9), 1362–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Handelsblatt (2009), Handelsblatt Betriebswirte-Ranking 2009, http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/bwl-ranking, accessed on 07.06.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hofmeister, Robert and Heinrich W. Ursprung (2008), Das Handelsblatt ökonomen Ranking 2007: Eine kritische Beurteilung, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9 (3), 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hottenrott, Hanna and Susanne Thorwarth (2011), Industry Funding of University Research and Scientifc Productivity, ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 10–105, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45852.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jansen, Dorothea, Andreas Wald, Karola Franke, Ulrich Schmoch, and Torben Schubert (2007), Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der wissenschaftlichen Forschung. Zum Einfuss von Rahmenbedingungen auf Forschungsleistung, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59 (1), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston, Ron (1994), Effects of Resource Concentration on Research Performance, Higher Education 28 (1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Laband, David N. and Bernard F. Lentz (2003), New Estimates of Economies of Scale and Scope in Higher Education, Southern Economic Journal 70 (1), 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lerbinger, Paul (1985), Der Studentenberg als Hemmschuh der Forschung? Eine empirische Untersuchung der Beiträge deutscher Hochschulen in betriebswirtschaftlichen Zeitschriften, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (8), 848–858.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lloyd, Peter J., Margaret H. Morgan, and Ross A. Williams (1993), Amalgamations of Universities: Are There Economies of Size and Scope?, Applied Economics 25, 1081–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Löffer, Andreas and Daniela Lorenz (2011), Das BWL-Ranking des Handelsblatts auf dem Prüfstand, Working Paper, November 4, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mitra, Debanjan and Peter N. Golder (2008), Does Academic Research Help or Hurt MBA Programs?, Journal of Marketing 72, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Narin, Francis and Kimberly S. Hamilton (1996), Bibliometric Performance Measures, Scientometrics 36, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schimank, Uwe (1992), Forschungsbedingungen der Professoren an den westdeutschen Hochschulen: Daten aus einer Befragung im Wintersemester 1990/91, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 92/2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schrader, Ulf and Thorsten Hennig-Thurau (2009), VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking, BuR–Business Research 2 (2), 180–204.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sonnberger, Heike (2012), Soziologen gegen Hochschulranking CHE? Danke, nee, DDP 29.06.2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Volkwein, J. Fredericks and Kyle V. Sweitzer (2006), Institutional Prestige and Reputation Among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges, Research in Higher Education 47 (2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weingart, Peter (2005), Impact of Bibliometrics upon the Science System: Inadvertent Consequences? Scientometrics 62, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sönke Albers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albers, S. What Drives Publication Productivity in German Business Faculties?. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 67, 6–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396921

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396921

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation