Skip to main content
Log in

Stuck in the Middle: Overcoming Strategic Complexity through IT Flexibility

  • Research Paper
  • Empirical Study
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms have reacted to a recent surge in environmental volatility by turning to mixed business strategies as a way to protect their existing markets and to establish new markets. Rather than choose a single focus for their strategy, these firms pursue operational excellence, customer intimacy, and product leadership at the same time. Research shows that mixed strategies — a characteristic of so-called stuck in the middle firms — lead to lower firm performance than single or pure-strategies. Mindful of the potentially conflicting goals and complexities found in firms with mixed strategies, in this paper, we assess the role of IT flexibility in helping firms to overcome such complexity and to ultimately thrive in a volatile environment that calls for increasingly mixed strategies. Using data from matched surveys of executives in 241 firms, we reveal that IT flexibility (hardware compatibility, software modularity, and network connectivity) is highest in mixed strategy firms and that such firms predominate in volatile settings where flexible IT is more apt to provide the means of responding to sudden or unexpected market change. These findings help explain why mixed strategy firms have higher IT business value than pure strategy firms, a result noted in prior research. For firms trying to prosper under mixed strategies, our results confirm the importance of IT flexibility and the broader implications of using IT to pursue multiple strategic goals, as defines stuck in the middle firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barua A., Kriebel C.H. and Mukhopadhyay T. (1995), Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation, Information Systems Research, 6 (1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj A. (2000) A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation, MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd T.A., Lewis, B.R. and Turner D.E. (2004) The Impact of IT Personnel Skills on IT Infrastructure and Competitive IS, Information Resources Management Journal, 17 (2), 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd T.A. and Turner D.E. (2000) Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (1), 167–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd T. A. and Turner D.E. (2001a) An Exploratory Analysis of the Value of the Skills of IT Personnel: Their Relationship to IS Infrastructure and Competitive Advantage, Decision Sciences, 32 (1), 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd T.A. and Turner D.E. (2001b) An Exploratory Examination of the Relationship between Flexible IT Infrastructure and Competitive Advantage, Information and Management, 39 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y.E., Huff S.L., Barclay D.W. and Copeland D.G. (1997) Business Strategy Orientation, Information Systems Orientation and Strategic Alignment, Information Systems Research, 8 (2), 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess G.G. and Davis P.S. (1984) Porter’s (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27 (3), 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K.M. and Martin J.A. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier W.J., Smith K.G., and Grimm C.M. (1999) The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine C.H. (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Perseus Books, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns G.S. and Lederer A. (2003) A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage, Decision Sciences, 34 (1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen P. (1991) Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli R. (2004) In Search of the Locus of Information Technology Business Value: Do Measurement Levels Make a Difference? University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata F.J., Fuerst W.L. and Barney J.B. (1995) Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based Analysis, MIS Quarterly, 19 (4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N., Gurbaxani V. and Kraemer K.L. (2004) Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value, MIS Quarterly, 28 (2), 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson H. and Pillai R.R. (1998) Clockspeed and Informational Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry, Information Systems Research, 9 (4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles R.E. and Snow C.C. (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D. and Friesen P. (1983) Strategy-making and Environment: The Third Link, Strategic Management Journal, 4 (3), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory (Second Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J.W. and Markus M.L. (2000) The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing, Information Systems Research, 11 (3), 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli G. and Ives B. (2005) IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature, MIS Quarterly, 29 (4), 747–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell T.C. and Dent-Micallef A. (1997) Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business and Technology Resources, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G., Barney J. and Muhanna W.A. (2004) Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-based View, Strategic Management Journal, 25 (1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G., Muhanna W.A., and Barney J. (2005) Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-based Analysis, MIS Quarterly, 29 (4), 625–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R.B. and Pearce J.A. (1988) Planned Patterns of Strategic Behavior and their Relationship to Business-unit Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 9 (1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal R. and Chan Y.E. (2001) Alignment between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers and Defenders, Information Systems Research, 12 (1), 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A. and Grover V. (2003) Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2), 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallon P.P. (2007) Does IT Pay to Focus? An Analysis of IT Business Value under Single and Multi-focused Business Strategies, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16 (3), 278–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon P.P. (2008) A Process-oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24 (3), 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallon P.P. and Kraemer K.L. (2006) The Development and Application of a Process-oriented Thermometer of IT Business Value, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17 (45), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece D., Pisano G. and Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treacy M. and Wiersema F. (1995) The Discipline of Market Leaders, Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade W. and Hulland J. (2004) The Resource-based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research, MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • White R.E. (1986) Generic Business Strategies, Organizational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Strategic Management Journal, 7 (3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul P. Tallon.

Additional information

Paul P. Tallon is Associate Professor of Information Systems at the Joseph A. Sellinger School of Business and Management at Loyola College in Maryland. He was previously on the IS faculty at Boston College. Before joining academia, he worked as an IT auditor and accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers and as an IT consultant with the UN International Trade Center in Geneva, Switzerland. His research interests include the economic and organizational impacts of IT, strategic alignment, IT portfolio and real options analysis, and the economics of data management. He has published over two dozen research papers in a variety of top-tier IS journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tallon, P.P. Stuck in the Middle: Overcoming Strategic Complexity through IT Flexibility. Global J. Flexible Syst. Manage. 9, 1–9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396546

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396546

Keywords

Navigation