Abstract
Recent developments in behavior analysis and cognitive science can be used to improve the uneasy relationship between these two approaches to psychological inquiry. Stimulus equivalence phenomena demonstrate the power of behavior analytic procedures to induce complex generative performances that are typically studied by cognitive scientists, while connectionism challenges the previously dominant symbol-based accounts of cognition and emphasizes the importance of environmental constraints and fundamental principles of learning as accounts of cognitive processing. The nature and possible contribution of stimulus equivalence to cognitive science are outlined, and connectionist simulations of complex equivalence phenomena are described. These simulations provide a possible rapprochement between behavior analysis and cognitive science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D. (in press). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record.
BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.
BECHTEL, W., & ABRAHAMSEN, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
CHOMSKY, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.
COMMONS, M. L., GROSSBERG, S., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1991). Neural network models of conditioning and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DONAHOE, J. W., & PALMER, D. C. (1989). The interpretation of complex human behavior: Some reactions to Parallel Distributed Processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 399–416.
FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.
FODOR, J. A., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.
GREEN. G., SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1991). The role of instructions in the transfer of ordinal functions through equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 287–304.
GUPTA, P., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1992). Integrating category acquisition with inflexional marking: A model of the German nominal system. Presented at the 14th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contigencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.
LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioral Processes, 13, 205–215.
LIPKENS, R., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (in press). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
RUMELHART, D. E., HINTON, G. E., & WILLIAMS, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propogating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.
SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., GREEN, G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47–63.
SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
STEELE, D. M., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dermot Barnes expresses his gratitude to Professor Max Taylor for providing the professional and financial assistance necessary to attend the 15th Symposium for Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, D., Hampson, P.J. Stimulus Equivalence and Connectionism: Implications for Behavior Analysis and Cognitive Science. Psychol Rec 43, 617–638 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395903
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395903