Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Swim Stress on Ne ophobia and Re conditioning Using a Conditioned Taste Aversion Procedure

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has found that swim stress during a classical conditioning trial attenuates conditioned taste aversion (CTA). In the current study, rats were used to examine the effects of inescapable swim stress on the habituation of neophobia to a flavored solution and reacquisition of an extinguished conditioned taste aversion. In Experiment 1, subjects were initially exposed to a taste, with some subjects receiving a swim experience to assess the level of neophobia on a subsequent taste-exposure test. Rats in Experiment 2 were given a taste-LiCl trial followed by extensive CS-alone extinction trials. Subjects then received the taste-LiCl pairing again, followed for some by a swim experience to examine its effect on subsequent reconditioning. Swim stress influenced CS processing on the final extinction trial. Thus, reacquisition was attenuated by swim, but there was no effect of swim stress on the attenuation of neophobia. These results are discussed in terms of the effects of stress on CS processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BERMUDEZ-RATTONI, F. (2004). Molecular mechanisms of taste recognition memory. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 209–217. doi:10.1038/nrn1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BOURNE, M. J., CALTON, J. L., GUSTAVSON, K. K., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1992). Effects of acute swim stress on LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats. Physiology & behavior, 51, 1227–1234. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOUTON, M. E. (1986). Slow reacquisition following extinction of conditioned suppression. Learning and Motivation, 17, 1–15. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(86)90017-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOUTON, M. E., & SWARTZENTRUBER, D. (1989). Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 43–53. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.15.1.43

    Google Scholar 

  • CALTON, J. L., MITCHELL, K. G., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1996). Retardation and summation tests of an extinguished conditioned excitor. Learning & Motivation, 27, 335–361. doi:10.1006/lmot.1996.0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DANGUIR, J., & NICOLAIDIS, S. (1977). Lack of reacquisition in learned taste aversions. Animal Learning & behavior, 5, 395–397. doi:10.3758/Bf03209585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOMJAN, M. (1977). Attenuation and enhancement of neophobia for edible substances. In L. M. Barker, M. Best, & M. Domjan (eds.), Learning mechanisms in food selection. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, K. F., & PARKER, L. A. (1975). Gustatory memory: Incubation and interference. Behavioural Biology, 13, 359–367. doi:10.1016/S0091-6773(75)91416-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUTIERREZ, R., TELLEZ, L. A., & BERMUDEZ-RATTONI, F. (2003). Blockade of cortical muscarinic but not Nmda receptors prevents a novel taste from becoming familiar. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1556–1562. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02608.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HALL, G., & PEARCE, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a pre-exposed Cs by a surprising event. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 127–140. doi:10.1080/14640748208400881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HART, J. A., BOURNE, M. J., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1995). Slow reacquisition of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & behavior, 23, 297–303. doi:10.3758/Bf03198926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KASPROW, W. J., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1993). Differential effects of distractor stimuli and the interval between favor exposures on neophobia and latent inhibition. The Psychological Record, 43, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAYE, H., GAMBINI, B., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1988). A dissociation between one-trial overshadowing and the effect of a distractor on habituation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 31–47. doi:10.1080/14640748808402307

    Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R. E., & MOORE, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415–419. doi:10.1037/h0046700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LUBOW, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1987). Neurobiology, psychology and habituation. Behavior Research & Therapy, 25, 81–97. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(87)90079-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASAKI, T., & NAKAJIMA, S. (2006). Taste aversion in rats induced by forced swimming, voluntary running, forced running, and lithium chloride injection treatments. Physiology & Behavior, 88, 411–416. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAJIMA, S., & MASAKI, T. (2004). Taste aversion learning induced by delayed swimming activity. Behavioural Processes, 67, 357–362. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PAYNE, J. D., NADEL, L., BRITTON, W. B., & JACOBS, W. J. (2004). The biopsychology of trauma and memory. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 76–128). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RADA, P., COLASANTE, C., SKIRZEWSKI, M., HERNANDEZ, L., & HOEBEL, B. (2006). Behavioral depression in the swim stress test causes a biphasic, long-lasting change in accumbens acetylcholine release, with partial compensation by acetylcholinesterase and muscarinic-1 receptors. Neuroscience, 141, 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • REVUSKY, S., & REILLY, S. (1989). Attenuation of conditioned taste aversion by external stressors. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & behavior, 33, 219–226. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(89)90453-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, D., & GARRUD, P. (1983). Variable processing of favors in rat Stm. Animal Learning & behavior, 11, 474–482. doi:10.3758/Bf03199804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, S., FIESER, S., JONES, J., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (2008). Effects of swim stress on latent inhibition using a conditioned taste aversion procedure. Physiology & behavior, 95, 539–541. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAGNER, A. R. (1976). expectancies and priming in Stm. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 177–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • WAGNER, A. R., RUDY, J. W., & WHITLOW, J. W. (1973). Rehearsal in animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 97, 407–426. doi:10.1037 /h0034136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHITEHOUSE, W. G., BLUSTEIN, J. E., WALKER, J., BERSH, P. J., & MARGULES, D. L. (1985). Shock controllability and opiate substrates of escape performance and nociception: Differential effects of peripherally and centrally acting naltrexone. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 717–733. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.99.4.717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd R. Schachtman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, J.M., Ramsey, A.K., Fowler, S.W. et al. Effects of Swim Stress on Ne ophobia and Re conditioning Using a Conditioned Taste Aversion Procedure. Psychol Rec 62, 295–306 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395803

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395803

Key words

Navigation