Abstract
Researchers haw often overlooked the relationships between sex and ratings of word characteristics, such as concreteness, context-availability, imageabil-ity, and emotionality. The current study investigated whether or not sex differences exist in such ratings for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. The results indicated that females rated concrete words as more emotional in nature. However, sex differences did not emerge in the ratings of absvact and emotion words. These findings indicate that sex differences can be demonstrated both across word types and across scales; they also emphasize the need to revise the standard models of word processing and representation so as to address issues related to sex differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALTARRIBA, J., & BAUR, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389–410.
FRIENDLY, M., FRANKLIN, P. E., HOFFMAN, D. M., & RUBIN, D. C. (1982). The Toronto word pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1080 words. Behavior Research Methods and instrumentation, 14, 375–399.
GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & instrumentation, 12, 395–427.
GOLEMAN, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
GRAVES, R., LANDIS, T., & GOODGLASS, H. (1981). Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words. Neuropsychologia, 19, 95–102.
HARSHMAN, R. A., HAMPSON, E., & BERENB, S.A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, part 1: Sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192.
HARSHMAN, R. A., & PAIVIO, A. (1987). “Paradoxical” sex differences in self-reported imagery. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–302.
HERZ, R.S., ELIASSEN, J., BELAND, S., & SOUZA, T. (2004) Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory. Neuropsychologia, 42, 371–378
HUNT, R. R., & ELLIS, H. C. (2004). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology (7th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
KIMURA, D., & CLARKE, P. G. (2002). Women’s advantage on verbal memory is not restricted to concrete words. Psychological Reports, 91, 1137–1142.
KIMURA, D., & SEAL, B. N. (2003). Sex differences in recall of real or nonsense words. Psychological Reports, 93, 263–264.
NELSON, D. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237–260.
PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25.
RUBIN, D. C., & FRIENDLY, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronounceability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition,, 79–94.
SCHWANENFLUGEL, P. J., AKIN, C., & LUH, W. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104.
SEIDLITZ, L., & DIENER, E. (1998). Sex differences in the recall of affective experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 262–271.
SHAVER, P., SCHWARTZ, J., KIRSON, D., & O’CONNER, C. (1987). Emption knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.
TOGLIA, M. P., & BATTIG, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbai].
YUILLE, J. C. (1968). Concreteness without imagery in Pa learning. Psychonomic Science, 11, 55–56.
WHISSELL, C. M. (1989). The dictionary of affect in language. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience, Vol. 4 (pp. 113–131). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was funded by a Faculty Research Award granted to the second author by the University at Albany. State University of N’ew York. We are grateful to N’oah Belanoff, Celena Martino, and Amy Stollery for their assistance with data collection. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and Jeffrey Johnson for helpful comments on a previous version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bauer, L.M., Altarriba, J. An Investigation of Sex Differences in Word Ratings Across Concrete, Abstract, and Emotion Words. Psychol Rec 58, 465–474 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395629
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395629