Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transfer of Learning between Matching (or Non-Matching)-To-Sample and Same-Different Discriminations in Rats

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four experiments examined transfer of learning between matching (or nonmatching)-to-sample discriminations and samedifferent discriminations. In Experiment 1, rats trained with matching (or nonmatching)-to-sample discriminations learned their subsequent nonshift tasks, consisting of the novel stimuli and novel configurations, faster than subsequent shifted ones. In Experiment 2, rats trained with same-different discriminations learned very quickly their subsequent same-different tasks consisting of the novel stimuli and novel configurations. Of all the rats, 88% responded correctly on the first trial in Phase 2 transfer. In Experiment 3, rats trained with the matching (or nonmatching)to- sample discriminations facilitated subsequent same-different discriminations, relative to rats given either a simultaneous discrimination or a pseudo-discrimination training with the matching (or nonmatching)-to-sample discriminations. In Experiment 4, rats trained with the same-different discriminations facilitated · subsequent matching (or nonmatching)-to-sample discriminations, relative to rats given either a position discrimination or a pseudo-discrimination training with the samedifferent task. These findings suggest that the same mechanism governs the formation of associations between stimuli in both matching (or nonmatching)-to-sample discriminations and samedifferent discriminations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGGLETON, J. P. (1985). One-trial object recognition by rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409–429.

  • BHATT, R. S., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1989). Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 231–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COOK, R. G., CAVOTO, K. K., & CAVOTO, B. R. (1995). Same-different texture discrimination and concept learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOK, R. G., CAVOTO, K. K., & CAVOTO, B. R. (1996). Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avain texture discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COOK, R. G., KATZ, J. S., & CAVOTO, B. R. (1997). Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 417–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COOK, R. G., & WIXED, J. T. (1997). Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: Testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 23 401–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DELIUS, J. D., DMELING, M., LEA, S. E. G., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1995). Reinforcement concordance induces and maintains stimulus associations in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 45, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V., CALLAHAN, T. D., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1993). Serial reversals of concurrent auditory discriminations in rats. The Psychological Record, 43, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, C. A., JAGIELO, J. A., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1983). “Same/different” symbol use by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, S. A., JAGIELO, J. A., ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching-to-sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERSEN, L., VON, & LEA, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination with polymorphous features. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FETTERMAN, J. G. (1991). Discrimination of temporal same-different relations by pigeons. In M. L. Commons, J. A. Nevin, & M. C. Davison (Eds.), Signal detection: Mechanisms, models, and applications (pp. 79–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALL, G., RAY, E., & BONARDI, C. (1993). Acquired equivalence between cues trained with a common antecedent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 391–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HONIG, W. K. (1969). Attentional factors governing the slope of the generalization gradient. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Ed.), Animal Discrimination Learning (pp. 35–62). London and New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEA, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOMBARDI, C. M., FACHINELLI, C. C., & DELIUS, J. D. (1984). Oddity of visual pattern conceptualized by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MUMBY, D. G., PINEL, J. P., & WOOD, E. R. (1990). Nonrecurring items delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: A new paradigm for testing nonspatial working memory. Psychobiology, 18, 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1978). The effect of overtraining on discrimination learning in white rats (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 49, 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1986). Overtraining, extinction and shift learning in a concurrent discrimination in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1988). Shift learning on identity and oddity learning in young children: Examination of validity of House’s chain model and Bowers’s rule model (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 36, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1992a). Effects of overtraining reversal learning by rats in concurrent and single discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1992b). Transfer of a matching and nonmatching concept in rats. Psychobiology, 20, 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1993a). Matching and nonmatching concept learning in rats. Psychobiology, 21, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1993b). Relational rule learning in the rat. Psychobiology, 21, 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1994). Transfer of matching and non-matching concept between recurring and non-recurring task in Kindergarten children (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1998). Stimulus classes formation in concurrent discriminations in rats as a function of overtraining. The Psychological Record, 48, 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1999a). A factor affecting stimulus classes formation in concurrent discriminations in rats. The Psychological Record, 49, 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, E. (1999b). Acquired equivalence of discriminative stimuli following two concurrent discrimination learning tasks as a function of overtraining in rats. The Psychological Record, 49, 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1999c). Mechanism of stimulus classes formation in concurrent discriminations in rats. The Psychological Record, 49, 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1999d). Transfer of learning between concurrent discriminations and matching (or non-matching)-to-sample discriminations in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (2000). Reversal learning in conditional discriminations is not controlled by reinforcer density. The Psychological Record, 49, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTHBLAT, L. A., & HAYES, L. L. (1987). Short-term object recognition memory in rats: Nonmatching with trial-unique junk stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 578–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANTIAGO, H., & WRIGHT, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory: Same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 498–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, R J. (1977). Transfer of oddity-from-sample performance in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, R J., & NEVIN, J. A. (1975). Transfer of hue matching in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAUGHAN, W., Jr. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAUGHAN, W., & HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1987). Choosing among natural stimuli. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 5–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WASSERMAN, E. A., HUGART, J. A., & KIRKPATRICK-STEGER, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, B., MACKINTOSH, N. J., & BOAKES, R. A. (1985). Matching and oddity learning in the pigeon: Transfer effects and absence of relational learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, A. A., SANTIAGO, H. C., SANDS, S. F., KENDRICK, D. F., & COOK, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial list by pigeons, monkey, and people. Science, 229, 287–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, A. A., SANTIAGO, H. C., URCUIOLI, P. J., & SANDS, S. F. (1983). Monkey and pigeon acquisition of same/different concept using pictorial stimuli. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 295–317). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, M. E., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1997). Entropy detection by pigeons: Response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 157–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, M. E., WASSERMAN, E. A., & GARNER, K. L. (1997). Effects of number of items on the pigeon’s discrimination of same from different visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 491–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1975). Concept learning in the pigeon: Transfer to new matching and nonmatching stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 88, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1976). Pigeons can learn identity or difference. Science, 191, 408–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., SHERBURNE, L. M., STEIRN, J. N., RANDALL, C. K., ROPER, K. L., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1992). Common coding in pigeons: Partial versus total reversals of one-to-many conditional discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., STEIRN, J. N., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Kagawa University, 1-1 Saiwai-Cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa, 760-8522, Japan

    Esho Nakagawa

Authors
  1. Esho Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esho Nakagawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagawa, E. Transfer of Learning between Matching (or Non-Matching)-To-Sample and Same-Different Discriminations in Rats. Psychol Rec 50, 771–805 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395382

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395382

Search

Navigation