Skip to main content
Log in

Acquired Equivalence of Discriminative Stimuli Following Two Concurrent Discrimination Learning Tasks as a Function of Overtraining in Rats

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments examined whether or not the members of each stimulus class between the discriminative stimuli formed during overtraining became functionally equivalent. In Experiment 1, rats were trained on two discrimination tasks to criterion or overtrained. Then they were tested on two new discriminations, in which the negative stimuli for the original discriminations were exchanged. This manipulation had little disruptive influence. on rats’ subsequent choices following overtraining, but not after criterion training. The effect of overtraining on exchanging the negative stimuli of two discriminations was replicated in Experiment 2. Experiment 2 makes it clear that the members of each pair of stimuli begin to become functionally equivalent after the rats receive overtraining for 10 days, and become perfectly functionally equivalent after the rats receive overtraining for 20 days. In Experiment 3, half of the rats were concurrently trained on two discriminations to criterion or overtrained. The remaining rats were separately trained in one discrimination on odd days in the training phase and the other on even days to criterion or overtrained. Then all rats received testing, in which the negative stimuli between two discriminations were exchanged. There was no significant difference in test performance after overtraining between these two groups, which were very excellent. Results of Experiments 1, 2, and 3 indicate that, in rats, stimulus classes established during overtraining have two properties of stimulus equivalence relation: exchangeability and substitutability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DELIUS, J. D., AMELING, M., LEA, S. E. G., & STADDON, J. E. R. (1995). Reinforcement concordance induces and maintains stimulus associations in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 45, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, C. A., JAGIELO, J. A., ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDIAMOND, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280–340). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWRENCE, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LAWRENCE, D. H. (1950). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: II. Selective association in a constant stimulus situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 175–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1962). The effect of overtraining on a reversal and a nonreversal shift. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 555–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1964). Overtraining and transfer within and between dimension in the rat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1965a). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1965b). Overtraining, reversal, and extinction in rats and chicks. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59, 31–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1978). The effect of overtraining on discrimination learning in white rats (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 49, 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1986). Overtraining, extinction and shift iearning in a concurrent discrimination in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1992). Effects of overtraining on reversal learning by rats in concurrent and single discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAKAGAWA, E. (1998). Stimulus classes formation process in concurrent discriminations in rats as a function of overtraining. The Psychological Record, 48, 537–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIPLEY, W. C. (1935). Indirect conditioning. Journal of Genera! Psychology, 12, 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. (1937). The differential responses in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 7, 556–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Process, 15, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAUGHAN, W., Jr. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENTALL, T. R., STEIRN, J. N., SHERBURNE, L. M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagawa, E. Acquired Equivalence of Discriminative Stimuli Following Two Concurrent Discrimination Learning Tasks as a Function of Overtraining in Rats. Psychol Rec 49, 327–348 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395323

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395323

Navigation