Skip to main content
Log in

Causal constructs and conceptual confusions

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior analysts take the position that prediction and control constitute the goals of science. This assumption has resulted in descriptive operations being overlooked and misunderstood. Among the most serious of these misunderstandings is the confusion of events with descriptive constructions. Confusion is likely when the events described present problems of observation, when they appear to resemble our descriptions of them, and when they are taken to be synonymous with our reactions to them. Examples of confusing events with their descriptions are examined in the context of the radical behavioral interpretation of causality, along with their implications for a scientific understanding. An alternative interpretation of causal knowledge is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAMS, M. A. (1994). Inherited behavior: Interbehavioral and radical behavioral interpretations. The Interbehaviorist, 22, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAUM, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior and culture. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAUM, W. M. (1995). Rules, culture and fitness. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CAPRA, F. (1976). The tao of physics. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • FETTERMAN, J. G., & KILLEEN, P. R. (1990). A componential analysis of pacemaker timing systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 766–780.

  • HAYES, L. J. (1991). Substitution and reference. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 3–18). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1992). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1993). Reality and truth. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 33–41). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1994). Psicologica interconductual: Basica y aplicada. In L. J. Hayes, E. Ribes, & E. Lopez Valdez (Eds.), Psicologica interconductual: Contribuciones en honor a J. R. Kantor. Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico: Universidade Guadalajara Direccion de Publicaciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1996). Space and time in psychological perspective. In L. J. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in Behavioral Behavioral Epistemology. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C, HAYES, L. J., & REESE, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophic core: A review of S. C. Pepper’s “World Hypotheses.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1938). The nature of psychology as a natural science. Acta Psychologica, 4, 1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1950). Psychology and logic, V.ll. Chicago: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1953). The logic of modern science. Chicago: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology (2nd ed.) Bloomington, IN: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1969). Scientific psychology and specious philosophy. The Psychological Record, 19, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1970). The analysis of the experimental analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 101–108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1971). The aim and progress of psychology and other sciences. Chicago: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYCAN, W. G. (1988). Skinner and the mind-body problem. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior (pp. 325–326). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHAEL, J. L. (1993). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, Ml: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RIBES, E. (1984). The relation between interbehaviorism and the experimental analysis of behavior: The search for a paradigm. The Psychological Record, 34, 567–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIBES, E. (1986). Is operant conditioning sufficient to cope with human behavior? In P. N. Chase & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Psychological aspects of language. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEGAL, E. F. (1973). Induction and the provenance of operants. In R. M. Gilbert & J. R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: Behavioral analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 406–418.

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ZIMMERMAN, D. (1979). Quantum theory and interbehavioral psychology. The Psychological Record, 29, 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayes, L.J., Adams, M.A. & Dixon, M.R. Causal constructs and conceptual confusions. Psychol Rec 47, 97–112 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395214

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395214

Navigation