Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Present and Former Deprivation on Consummatory Contrast

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consummatory contrast was investigated in food-deprived and nondeprived rats over repeated shifts from 32% to 4% sucrose. Repeated negative contrast was obtained across five downshifts, enduring in nondeprived subjects and tending to diminish in deprived subjects. Positive contrast was obtained with deprived subjects in the first upshift only but was not apparent with nondeprived subjects. In a second phase, deprivation conditions were reversed and subjects displayed patterns of negative contrast appropriate to the current deprivation condition, regardless of prior deprivation. Positive contrast was not obtained with formerly nondeprived subjects or when all subjects were on ad lib feeding, but reemerged when formerly deprived subjects were returned to a deprived state. The results are discussed in terms of the interaction of deprivation with the conflict mechanisms or the learned responses involved in contrast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BECKER, H. C. (1986). Comparison of the effects of the benzodiazepine midazolam and three serotonin antagonists on a consummatory conflict paradigm. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 24, 1057–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BOWER, G. H. (1961). A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRAZIER, M. M., & DACHOWSKI, L. (1991). Consummatory contrast effects in nondeprived rats following shifts in sucrose concentration. The Psychological Record, 41, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPALDI, E. D. (1971). Simultaneous shifts in reward magnitude and level of food deprivation. Psychonomic Science, 23, 357–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAPALDI, E. D., OWENS, J., & PALMER, K. A. (1994). Effects of food deprivation on learning and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by saccharin or sucrose. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F. (1991). Incentive contrast and selected animal models of anxiety. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 207–243). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., BECKER, H. C., & CHECKE, S. (1983). Repeated successive contrast in consummatory behavior with repeated shifts in sucrose concentration. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., BECKER, H. C., & DRISCOLL, C. (1982). Conditions under which amobarbital sodium influences contrast in consummatory behavior. Physiological Psychology, 10, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., BECKER, H. C., & POHORECKY, L. (1985). Correlation of corticosterone elevation and negative contrast varies as a function of postshift day. Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., GRIGSON, P. S., & LIND, S. (1990). Chlordiazepoxide and the moderation of the initial response to reward reduction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42B, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., & LARGEN, J. (1975). Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 653–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., LOMBARDI, B. R., WRIGHTSON, J., & DEPTULA, D. (1980). Conditions under which chlordiazepoxide influences successive gustatory contrast. Psychopharmacology, 67, 269–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FLAHERTY, C. F., & ROWAN, G. A. (1986). Successive, simultaneous, and anticipatory contrast in the consumption of saccharin solutions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 381–393.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GRIGSON, P. S., & FLAHERTY, C. F. (1991). Cyproheptadine prevents the initial occurrence of successive negative contrast. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 40, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEHIEL, R., & BOLLES, R. C. (1988). Learned flavor preferences based on calories are independent of initial hedonic value. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MELLGREN, R. L. (1972). Positive and negative contrast effects using delayed reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 3, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PREMACK, D., & HILLIX, W. A. (1962). Evidence for shift effects in the consummatory response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 284–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RABINER, D. L., KLING, J. W., & SPRAGUER, P. A. (1988). Modulation of taste- induced drinking: The effects of concentration shifts and drinking interruptions. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RILEY, E. P., & DUNLAP, W. P. (1979). Successive negative contrast as a function of deprivation condition following shifts in sucrose concentration. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHANAB, M. E., & FERRELL, H. J. (1970). Positive contrast in the Lashley maze under different drive conditions. Psychonomic Science, 20, 31–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHANAB, M. E., SANDERS, R., & PREMACK, D. (1969). Positive contrast in the runway obtained with delay of reward. Science, 164, 724–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of this study were conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

The author acknowledges the assistance of Lawrence W. Dachowski, Department of Psychology, Tulane University, in the supervision and direction of this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brazier, M.M. Effects of Present and Former Deprivation on Consummatory Contrast. Psychol Rec 46, 187–200 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395171

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395171

Navigation