Abstract
Successive positive and negative contrast effects in consummatory behavior were investigated following shifts in sucrose concentrations in nondeprived subjects. Forty-four male albino rats were given daily 5-min access to either a 4%- or 32%-sucrose solution across a 14-day preshift period. Subjects in each group were then assigned to either a control or shifted condition. Shifted groups were upshifted (4–32%) or downshifted (32–4%) for a 10-day postshift period. Negative contrast was apparent in both lick rate and time spent at the drinking tube across the first 4 days of postshift. Positive contrast effects were not obtained, but rather a significant effect opposite to positive contrast occurred. The improbability of the ceiling effect explanation for the present results is discussed. Differences relative to deprivation state and the role of perceptual (taste) factors in contrast effects are also examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BLACK, R. W. (1976). Reward variables in instrumental conditioning: A theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 199–244). New York: Academic Press.
BOWER, G. H. (1961). A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 196–199.
CALEF, R. S., CALEF, R. A., MAXWELL, F. R., & MCHEWITT, E. R. (1975). Positive discrimination contrast with delay of reward or low drive. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 120–122.
CHECHILE, R., & FOWLER, H. (1973). Primary and secondary negative incentive contrast in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 189–197.
DACHOWSKI, L., & BRAZIER, M. M. (1991). Consummatory incentive contrast: Experimental design relationships and deprivation effects. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 245–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
FLAHERTY, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 409–440.
FLAHERTY, C. F. (1991). Incentive contrast and selected animal models of anxiety. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 207–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
FLAHERTY, C. F., BECKER, H. C., & DRISCOLL, C. (1982). Conditions under which amobarbital sodium influences contrast in consummatory behavior. Physiological Psychology, 10, 122–128.
FLAHERTY, C. F., GRIGSON, P. S., & ROWAN, G. A. (1986). Chlordiazepoxide and the determinants of negative contrast. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 315–321.
FLAHERTY, C. F., & LARGEN, J. (1975). Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiololgical Psychology, 88, 653–664.
FLAHERTY, C. F., & ROWAN, G. A. (1986). Successive, simultaneous, and anticipatory contrast in the consumption of saccharin solutions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 381–393.
FLAHERTY, C. F., & ROWAN, G. A. (1989). Negative contrast in the consumption of sucrose and quinine-adulterated sucrose solutions. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 8, 47–55.
MATSUMOTO, R. T. (1969). Relative reward effects in differential conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 589–592.
MCHEWITT, E. R. (1974). A comparison of S+ and S- depression effects in differential conditioning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 3–5.
MCHOSE, J. H., & HOWARD, G. S. (1973). Performance in differential instrumental conditioning with infrequent S+ presentations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 132–134.
MEINRATH, A. B., & FLAHERTY, C. F. (1988). Effect of varied taste experience on negative contrast in consummatory behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 87–96.
MELLGREN, R. L. (1972). Positive and negative contrast effects using delayed reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 3, 185–193.
PANKSEPP, J., & TROWILL, J. A. (1971). Positive and negative contrast in licking with shifts in sucrose concentration as a function of food deprivation. Learning and Motivation, 2, 49–57.
PREMACK, D., & HILLIX, W. A. (1962). Evidence for shift effects in the consummatory response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 284–288.
RILEY, E. P., & DUNLAP, W. P. (1979). Successive negative contrast as a function of deprivation condition following shifts in sucrose concentration. American Journal of Psychology 92, 59–70.
SHANAB, M. E., & FERRELL, H. J. (1970). Positive contrast in the Lashley maze under different drive conditions. Psychonomic Science, 20, 31–32.
SHANAB, M. E., & MCCUISTION, S. (1970). Effects of shifts in magnitude and delay of reinforcement upon runway performance in the rat. Psychonomic Science, 21, 264–266.
SHANAB, M. E., SANDERS, R., & PREMACK, D. (1969). Positive contrast in the runway obtained with delay of reward. Science, 164, 724–725.
WILLIAMS, B. A. (1983). Another look at contrast in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 345–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Tulane University, New Orleans.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brazier, M.M., Dachowski, L. Consummatory Contrast Effects in Nondeprived Rats Following Shifts in Sucrose Concentration. Psychol Rec 41, 125–132 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395098
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395098