Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Versus Group Learning: Developmental and Social Differences in Two Selected Mouse Lines

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intent of this study was to evaluate whether differences in brain excitability would influence learning. Two selectively bred lines of mice hypothesized to be different for this trait were employed, and a unique apparatus was used to evaluate learning in these animals when trained and retested in groups as well as individually. The results of Experiment 1 clearly demonstrate that short-sleep (SS) mice learn better than long-sleep (LS) mice and that adult animals learn better than young animals for both lines. Additionally, it was demonstrated that animals trained and tested in groups performed worse than individual animals. Experiment 2 was designed to ascertain whether the detrimental effect of grouping animals occurred on acquisition or retention. The results surprisingly show that the animals had to be grouped during both acquisition and retention for a deficit to appear. Experiment 3 analyzed how a “plant” animal affected the other animals in the group during retention. It was discovered that for LS mice the experience of the plant animal did not matter, but for SS mice only an animal naive to the shock experience could disrupt performance. These results are discussed in the context of social learning in animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALLEE, W. C. (1938). Social life of animals. New York: Norton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ALPERN, H. P., & JACKSON, S. A. (1978). Stimulants and depressants: Drug effects on memory. In M. A. Lipton et al. (Eds.), Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress (pp. 663–675). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALPERN, H. P., & MARRIOTT, J. G. (1973). Short-term memory: Facilitation and disruption with cholinergic agents. Physiology and Behavior, 11, 571–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ALPERN, H. P., & MCINTYRE, T. D. (in press). Evidence that the selectively bred long-and short-sleep mouse lines display common narcotic reactions to many depressants. Psychopharmacology.

  • CHURCH, A. C., FULLER, J. L., & DUDEK, B. C. (1976). Salsolinol differentially affects mice selected for sensitivity to alcohol. Psychopharmacology, 47, 49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DAWSON, R. G., & MCGAUGH, J. L. (1973). Drug facilitation of learning and memory. In J. A. Deutsch (Ed.), The physiological basis of memory (pp. 78–111). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEUTSCH, J. A. (1973). The cholinergic synapse and the site of memory. In J. A. Deutsch (Ed.), The physiological basis of memory (pp. 59–76). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERGUSON, G. A. (1976). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALEF, B. G. (1976). Social transmission of acquired behavior: A discussion of tradition and social learning in vertebrates. In J. S. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 77–99). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALEF, B. G. (1977). Mechanisms for the social transmission of acquired food preferences from adult to weanling rats. In L.M. Barker, M. Best, & M. Domjan (Eds.), Learning mechanisms in food selection (pp. 123–148). Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GANDOLFI, G. (1976). Social learning in non-primate animals. Bulletin of Zoology, 42, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREER, C. A., & ALPERN, H. P. (1977). Mediation of myoclonic seizures by dopamine and clonic seizures by acetylcholine and G Ab A. Life Sciences, 21, 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREER, C. A., & ALPERN, H. P. (1978). Differential neurohumoral modulation of myoclonic and clonic seizures. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamic et de Thérapie, 236, 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAINARDI, D. (1976). Tradition and the social transmission of behavior in animals. In J. S. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 227–255). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCCLEARN, G. E., & KAKIHANA, R. (1973). Selective breeding for ethanol sensitivity in mice. Behavior Genetics, 3, 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCGAUGH, J. L., & PETRINOVICH, L. F. (1965). Effects of drugs on learning and memory. International Review of Neurobiology, 8, 139–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MCINTYRE, T. D., & ALPERN, H. P. (1983). The interaction of Cns depressants and Gabaergic drugs in mice selectively-bred for the narcotic effects of ethanol. Neuroscience Abstracts, 9(1), 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • THORPE, W. H. (1983). Learning and instinct in animals (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alpern, H.P., McIntyre, T.D. Individual Versus Group Learning: Developmental and Social Differences in Two Selected Mouse Lines. Psychol Rec 35, 203–211 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394926

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394926

Navigation