Skip to main content
Log in

Shifts in Magnitude of a Shock Us for Goldfish (Carassius Auratus) in a Respiratory Conditioning Situation

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goldfish were classically conditioned with tone as the CS, shock as the US, shock-induced cessation of breathing as the UCR, and a decrease in breathing as the CR. During the first phase of training half the classically conditioned fish experienced a high intensity US and half experienced a low intensity US. During the second phase of training half the fish with each shock intensity were shifted to the other shock intensity. Respiration was lower in response to the high as compared to the low intensity US during the first phase of training. Following a change in US magnitude, fish rapidly shifted their respiration level. A negative contrast effect was obtained for fish shifted to a lower level of shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • BITTERMAN, M. E. 1966. Animal learning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • BREUNING, S. E., & WOLACH, A. H. 1977. Successive negative contrast effects with goldfis? (Carassius auratus). The Psychological Record, 27, 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BREUNING, S. E., & WOLACH, A. H. 1979. Successive negative contrast effects for activity-conditioned goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a function of housing conditions. The Psychological Record, 29, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURSTEIN, K. R. 1965. The influence of UCS upon the acquisition of the conditioned eyelid response. Psychonomic Science, 2, 203–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAPALDI, E. J., & LYNCH, D. 1967. Repeated shifts in reward magnitude: Evidence in favor of an associational and absolute (noncontextual) interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 226–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COCHRANE, T. L., SCOBIE, S. R., & FALLON, D. 1973. Negative contrast in goldfis (Carassius auratus). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAY, R. R., & MACKINNON, J. R. 1969. A simplified technique for conditioning respiratory mouth movements in fish. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GONZALEZ, R. C., POTTS, A., PITCOFF, K., & BITTERMAN, M. E. 1972. Runway performance of goldfish as a function of complete and incomplete reduction in amount of reward. Psychonomic Science, 27, 305–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GONZALEZ, R. C., & POWERS, A. S. 1973. Simultaneous contrast in goldfish. Animal Learning and Behavior, 1, 96–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOWES, G., & BITTERMAN, M. E. 1967. Reward and learning in the goldfish. Science, 157, 456–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1971. Reward and aftereffects of reward in the learning of goldfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 225–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MELLGREN, R. L. 1971. Positive contrast in the rat as a function of number of preshift trials in the runway. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 77, 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OST, J. W. P., & LAUER, D. W. 1965. Some investigations of classical salivary conditioning in the dog. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning: A symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAYMOND, B., ADERMAN, M., & WOLACH, A. H. 1972. Incentive shifts in the goldfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 78, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R. A. 1974. Effect of inflation of the unconditioned stimulus value following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. 1953. Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of the intensity of the UCS. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W. 1956. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W., HAGGARD, D. F., & ROSS, L. E. 1958. UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 404–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPENCE, K. W., & PLATT, J. R. 1966. UCS intensity and performance in eyelid conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOLACH, A. H., RAYMOND, B., & HURST, J. W. 1973. Reward magnitude shifts with goldfish. The Psychological Record 23, 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breuning, S.E., Ferguson, D.G., McHale, M.A. et al. Shifts in Magnitude of a Shock Us for Goldfish (Carassius Auratus) in a Respiratory Conditioning Situation. Psychol Rec 30, 367–375 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394686

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394686

Navigation