Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Discriminative Stimuli in Concurrent Performances: Duration of Changeover Delay

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pigeons alternated between simultaneously available, variable-interval 90-sec. schedules using a Findley changeover response procedure. Responses on the left key resulted in reinforcers according to the variable-interval schedules, while responses on the right key altered the reinforcement contingencies on the left key and initiated a changeover delay. Concurrent schedules were in effect when a changeover response alternated both the reinforcement schedule and discriminative stimulus on the left key. When the changeover response alternated only the reinforcement schedule, but not the discriminative stimulus on the left key, a parallel schedule was in effect. The lengths of the changeover delays were manipulated for both the concurrent and parallel schedules. For concurrent and parallel conditions, the birds were nondifferential between the components in terms of the relative proportion of responses emitted, time spent, and reinforcers received. When changeover delay was varied, changeover response rate was inversely related to the changeover duration. However, for a given changeover duration, changeover rate was consistently higher in concurrent than in parallel conditions. For both concurrent and parallel conditions, left-key response rate during the changeover delay was consistently greater than during post-changeover periods. A change in the discriminative stimulus (concurrent conditions) facilitates, but is not necessary for, the maintenance of changeover responding. These data suggest that the elevated rate on the left key during changeover delay is not affected greatly by variation in the discriminative stimuli, though the role of Pavlovian conditioning cannot be completely ruled out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BROWNSTEIN, A. J., & PLISKOFF, S. S. 1968. Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 683–688.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BROWNSTEIN, A. J., & SHULL, R. I. 1970. Effects of changeover delay in concurrent schedules of reinforcement of keypecking by pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 19, 131–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. 1966. Concurrent operants. W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C., & REYNOLDS, G. S. 1968. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 327–383.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FINDLEY, J. D. 1958. Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 123–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HEMMES, N. S. 1973. Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 171–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HERRNSTEIN, R. J., & LOVELAND, D. H. 1972. Food avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 369–383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KELLER, K. 1974. The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 249–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KILLEEN, P. 1972. A yoked-chamber chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 13–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • KISH, G. B. 1966. Sensory reinforcement. W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • MENLOVE, R. L. 1975. Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 309–337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PLISKOFF, S. S. 1971. Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 249–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. 1973. Contrast and matching. Psychological Review, 80, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REDFORD, M., & PERKINS, C. C. 1974. The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 145–150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B. 1974. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon depends upon the location of the stimulus. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B. 1975. Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 167–176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, B., & GAMZU, E. 1977. Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHULL, R. I., & PLISKOFF, S. S. 1967. Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: Some effects on relative performance measures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 517–527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SHULL, R. I., & PLISKOFF, S. S. 1971. Changeover behavior under pairs of fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 75–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SILBERBERG, A., & FANTINO, E. 1970. Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 13, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WYCKOFF, L. B., Jr. 1952. The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part 1. Psychological Review, 59, 431–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by funds granted to James T. Miller by the Organized Research Fund of the University of Texas at Arlington. Portions of these data were presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, May 1975. Reprints may be obtained from Gordon Bourland, Division of Behavioral Psychology, John F. Kennedy Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; or from James T. Miller, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bourland, G., Miller, J.T. Role of Discriminative Stimuli in Concurrent Performances: Duration of Changeover Delay. Psychol Rec 28, 263–271 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394535

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394535

Navigation