Skip to main content
Log in

Reversal Learning Set in Successive Discrimination Reversal Learning and Transfer with Rats Using Visual and Olfactory Cues

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hooded male rats trained on simple discriminations between odor or brightness cues learned successively to reverse between the odor or brightness cues. They were then transferred to a successive discrimination reversal (SDR) of the other modality. The transfer data indicated that SDR training with one set of cues facilitated the learning of a subsequent discrimination in the other modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BITTERMAN, M. E., WODINSKY, J., & CANDLAND, D. K. 1958. Some comparative psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 20, 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FELLOWS, B. J. 1967. Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JENNINGS, J. W., & KEEFER, L. H. 1969. Olfactory learning sets in two varieties of domestic rat. Psychological Reports, 24, 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LANGWORTHY, R. A., & JENNINGS, J. W. 1972. Odd ball, abstract, olfactory learning in laboratory rats. The Psychological Record, 22, 487–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOVEJOY, 1968. Attention in discrimination learning. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1965. Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1969. Comparative studies of reversal and probability learning: Rats, birds and fish. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherladn (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J., MCGONIGLE, B., HOLGATE, V., & VANDERVER, V. 1968. Factors underlying improvement in serial reversal learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 85–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’GRADY, R. S., & JENNINGS, J. W. 1972. A comparison of olfactory and visual cue ultilization in laboratory rats. The Psychological Record, 22, 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDOWSKI, J. B., & LOCKHARD, R. B. 1966. Some preliminary considerations in research. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUTHERLAND, N. S. 1964. The learning of discriminations by animals. Endeavour, 23, 148–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, D. R. 1969. The use of operant conditioning techniques to investigate perceptual processes in animals. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, D. R., MILLER, J. T., & SVINICKI, J. G. 1971. Nonspecific transfer effects of discrimination training in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 74, 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Data for this report are from the first author’s Ph.D dissertation, University of Montana, 1973.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Grady, R.S., Jennings, J.W. Reversal Learning Set in Successive Discrimination Reversal Learning and Transfer with Rats Using Visual and Olfactory Cues. Psychol Rec 24, 243–251 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394240

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394240

Navigation