Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Differential Rates of Dark Adaptation to “Taboo” and “Neutral” Stimuli

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worthington (1964) reported detectability differences favoring neutral over taboo four-letter words. He measured the dark-adaptation time necessary, not to recognize, but merely to detect a stimulus. Our aim: to duplicate all the essential features of Worthington’s experiment; the outcome: no significant differences involving word class. Therefore it seems premature to conclude that perceptual defense plays a role in visual detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • WORTHINGTON, A. G. 1964. Differental rates of dark adaptation to “taboo” and “neutral” stimuli. Canad. J. Psychol., 18, 257–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weintraub, D.J., Krantz, D.H. Non-Differential Rates of Dark Adaptation to “Taboo” and “Neutral” Stimuli. Psychol Rec 18, 63–69 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393743

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393743

Navigation