Skip to main content
Log in

Avoidance and Response Duration as a Function of the Length of the Warning Period

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four Ss (rats) were given 3000 trials under a discriminated avoidance training schedule in a lever pressing apparatus. The warning period was correlated with silence, and a 5 sec. intertrial interval was indicated by a buzzer. For three Ss the warning period was gradually increased over sessions from 1 sec. to 16 sec, and to 32 sec. for the fourth S. On a few sessions the distinction between the warning signal and inter-trial interval was eliminated and then reinstated; this tested for stimulus control. Measures of response latency to the warning stimulus and of response holding times were obtained. The results showed that percentage avoidance increased with the length of the warning period and was negatively correlated with the Ss’ lever holding behavior. Latencies of avoidance response fell at the mid-point of the warning periods investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BUGELSKI, B. R., & COYER, R. A. 1950. Temporal conditioning and anxiety reduction in avoidance learning. Amer. Psychol., 5, 264–265. (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’AMATO, M. R., KELLER, D., & DiCARA, L. 1964. Facilitation of discriminated Aavoidance learning by discontinuous shock. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol., 58, 344–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DILLOW, P. V., & HURWITZ, H. M. B. 1967. The safety signal in discriminated avoidance. Paper read to S.E.P.A., Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • DINSMOOR, J. A., MATSUOKA, Y., & WINOGRAD, E. 1958. Bar holding as a preparatory response in escape-from-shock training. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol., 51(5), 637–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HEARST, E., & WHALEN, R. E. 1963. Facilitating effects of D-Amphetamine on discriminated-avoidance behavior. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol., 56(1), 124–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. 1943 Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURWITZ, H. M. B. 1964a. Method for discriminated avoidance training. Science, 145, 1070–1071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HURWITZ, H. M. B. 1964b. Discriminated avoidance training in rats. Science, 146, 1600.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURWITZ, H. M. B., & DILLOW, P. V. 1966. The effect of strain of rats on the acquisition of discriminated avoidance response. Psychonomic Science, 6(9), 401–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HURWITZ, H. M. B., & DILLOW, P. V. 1967. The effects of the warning signal on response characteristics in avoidance learning. Paper for symposium on Discrimination Learning, Sussex University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAMIN, L. J. 1965. Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In William F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • KISH, G. B. 1955. Avoidance learning to the onset and cessation of conditioned stimulus energy. J. exp. Psychol, 50, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LEVINE, S., & ENGLAND, S. J. 1960. Temporal factors in avoidance learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 53, 282–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MYERS, A. K. 1960. Onset vs. termination of stimulus energy as the CS in avoidance conditioning and pseudo-conditioning. J. comp physiol. Psychol, 53, 72–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MEYER, D. R., CHO, C., & WESEMAN, A. 1960. On problems of conditioning discriminated lever-press avoidance responses. Psychol. Rev, 67, 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIGLER, B. 1963. Bar holding during escape conditioning. J. exp. Anal. Behav, 6, 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PEARL, J., & EDWARDS, R. E. 1962. Delayed avoidance conditioning: warning stimulus (CS) duration. Psychol. Reports, 11, 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The experiment was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom, and the preparation of this report was made possible by Grant GB-5379 from NSF.

The experiments were run during the summer of 1965 shortly before both authors transferred from Birkbeck College, London, to the University of Tennessee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurwitz, H.M.B., Dillow, P.V. Avoidance and Response Duration as a Function of the Length of the Warning Period. Psychol Rec 17, 517–524 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393727

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393727

Navigation