Skip to main content
Log in

A retrospective appreciation of Willard Day’s contributions to radical behaviorism and the analysis of verbal behavior

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Willard Day’s contributions to radical behaviorism are grouped under three headings: (a) an emphasis on the distinction between radical and methodological behaviorism; (b) an emphasis on the interpretation, rather than the prediction and control, of behavior; and (c) an emphasis on the analysis of verbal behavior as a natural, ongoing phenomenon. The paper suggests that the contributions above are listed in ascending order of significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, M. (1988, September). The Reno-methodology: A short description. Paper presented at the meeting of the Radical Behaviorist Retreat, Glenbrook, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, G. (1956). The contribution of John B. Watson. Psychological Review, 63, 265–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinker, R. P., & Jaynes, J. (1988). Waiting for the world to make me talk and tell me what I meant. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (pp. 168–171). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., & Harnad, S. (Eds). (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1969a). On certain similarities between the Philosophical Investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1969b). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 315–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1976). The case for behaviorism. In M. H. Marx & F. E. Goodson (Eds.), Theories in contemporary psychology (pp. 534–545). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1983). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism, 11, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1987). What is radical behaviorism? In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 13–39). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F., & Moore, J. (in press). On certain relations between contemporary philosophy and radical behaviorism. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on classical and modern behaviorism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  • Dougher, M. J. (1989). A functional analysis of a behavior analyst’s functional analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 19–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, T. J. (1989). In memorium: Willard F. Day, Jr. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 1–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (1964). Psychology and emerging conceptions of knowledge as unitary. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 1–45). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigland, S. (1989). On the relation between radical behaviorism and the science of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 25–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1975). On the principle of operationism in a science of behavior. Behaviorism, 3, 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. M., & Morris, E. K. (1987). A history of the term radical behaviorism: From Watson to Skinner. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 27–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 57, 270–277, 290–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. W., Sundberg, M. L, & Braam, S. J. (1988). A preliminary investigation of the consequences that define the mand and the tact. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 61–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (Eds.), (in press). Contemporary perspectives on classical and modern behaviorism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, J. A retrospective appreciation of Willard Day’s contributions to radical behaviorism and the analysis of verbal behavior. Analysis Verbal Behav 9, 97–104 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392863

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392863

Navigation