Matching Theory in Natural Human Environments
- 8 Downloads
Matching theory is a mathematical account of behavior, many aspects of which have been confirmed in laboratory experiments with nonhuman and human subjects. The theory asserts that behavior is distributed across concurrently available response alternatives in the same proportion that reinforcement is distributed across those alternatives. The theory also asserts that behavior on a single response alternative is a function not only of reinforcement contingent on that behavior, but also of reinforcement contingent on other behaviors and of reinforcement delivered independently of behavior. These assertions constitute important advances in our understanding of the effects of reinforcement on behavior. Evidence from the applied literature suggests that matching theory holds not only in laboratory environments, but also in natural human environments. In addition, the theory has important therapeutic implications. For example, it suggests four new intervention strategies, and it can be used to improve treatment planning and management. Research on matching theory illustrates the progression from laboratory experimentation with nonhuman subjects to therapeutic applications in natural human environments.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Catania, A. C. (1981). Discussion: The flight from experimental analysis. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantificaiton of steady-state operant behaviour (pp. 49–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
- de Villiers, P. A. (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 233–287). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Killeen, P. R. (1982). Incentive theory. In D. J. Bernstein (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1981: Vol. 29. Response structure and organization. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- McDowell, J. J (1981a). On the validity and utility of Herrnstein’s hyperbola in applied behavior analysis. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour (pp. 311–324). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G., & Reid, J. (1970). Reciprocity and coercion: Two facets of social systems. In C. Neuringer & J. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 133–177). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. L. (1983). Skinner’s environmentalism: The analogy with natural selection. Behaviorism, 11, 133–153.Google Scholar
- Winett, R., & Roach, E. (1973). The effects of reinforcing academic performance on social behavior. Psychological Record, 23, 391–396.Google Scholar