Skip to main content
Log in

Designing Courseware: Prompts from Behavioral Instruction

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior analysis has been at the forefront of instructional design for many years. However, this leadership position is rapidly eroding as teachers, trainers and other educators insist that behavioral instruction is good only for meeting simplistic educational goals. I argue that in order for behavior analysis to continue to influence the field of instructional design, behavior analysts need to help people develop instructional programs that use advanced interactive computer systems and that are based on all the components of behavioral instruction. Therefore, this paper suggests the following strategy. First, it teaches people to select authoring systems that will enable them to design interactive computer programs. Second, in order to improve current authoring systems it provides a set of prompts that integrate the features of behavioral instruction. I claim that the integration of these prompts with an advanced authoring system will facilitate the development of complex, conceptual learning programs and minimize current criticisms of behavioral instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Faust, G. W. (1973). Educational psychology. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C., & Engelmann, S. E. (1978). Analysis of achievement data on six cohorts of low income children from 20 school districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model Technical Report 78-1. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Follow Through Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C., Edelmann, S. E., & Thomas, D. R. (1975). Teaching 2: Cognitive learning and instruction. Palo Alto: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Kratwohl, D. R. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: MacKay, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1968). Contemporary research in operant behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayton, T. G., & Madsen, C. H. (1975). A comparison of three methods of teaching child psychology using a progressive multiple baseline achievement test. In J. M. Johnston (Ed.), Research and technology in college and university teaching (pp. 205–214). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968). The systems approach. New York: Dell Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. M. (1982). Defining applied behavior analysis: An historical analogy. The Behavioral Analyst, 5, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S. E. (1969). Conceptual learning. San Rafael, CA: Dimensions Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S. E., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington Pub., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Wager, W., & Rajas, A. (1981). Planning and authoring computer-assisted instructional lessons. Educational Technology, 21, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. J. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1962). Psychology and instructional technology. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training research and education (pp. 1–30). Pittsburgh: Université Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. G., Solomon, C., Doran, J., & Frezza, D. A. (1976). The analysis of behavior in planning instruction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J., & Johnson, K. R. (1983, May). An analysis of PSI, DI, CAI and precision teaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis. Milwaukee, WI.

  • Johnson, K. R., & Chase, P. N. (1981). Behavior analysis in instructional design: A functional typology of verbal tasks. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 103–122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Ruskin, R. (1977). Behavioral instruction: An evaluative review. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NY: LEA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (1982). Authoring systems in computer based education. Communications of the ACM, 25, 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1968). “Goodbye teacher ….” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. (1950). Principles of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. H. (1984). Evaluators and designers: Another aspect of computer literacy. Computers in Schools, 1, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Direct measurement and prothesis in retarded children. Journal of Education, 147, 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Belmont, CA: Fearon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1972). Goal analysis. Palo Alto: Fearon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M. (1967). Empirical testing of programs. In P. C. Lange (Ed.), Programmed instruction (pp. 104–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K., & Weaver, F. H. (1972). A multiple baseline achievement test. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 393–399). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Follow Through Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, R. B. (1984). Courseware for the 80’s. T.H.E. Journal, 12, 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M. (1979). Theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 14, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M., & Feldman, R. S. (1984). Educational psychology: Applications and theory. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J. M. (1981). Microcomputer systems for authoring, diagnosis and instruction in rule-based subject matter. Educational Technology, 21, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. P. (1984). Whole-brain training: Ticket to the information age? Training, 21, 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, R. (1977). Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J. S. (1977). Behavioral psychology for teachers. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional Teaching (2nd ed.), Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. G. (1977). A behavioral typology of educational objectives for the cognitive domain. Educational Technology, 17, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. (1984). Evaluating computer-assisted instruction: The good, the bad and why. Training, 21, 22–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chase, P.N. Designing Courseware: Prompts from Behavioral Instruction. BEHAV ANALYST 8, 65–76 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391913

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391913

Navigation