Skip to main content
Log in

An Approach to Identifying the Conditions Under Which Response Interruption Will Reduce Automatically Reinforced Problem Behavior

  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response interruption is a common intervention for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement, but this intervention is challenging for caregivers to implement with consistent fidelity. In the current study, we challenged the integrity of response interruption across two participants by examining carry over into conditions in which the procedure was not implemented, by removing the presence of an interventionist, and by introducing delays to implementation. The results indicated that these challenges severely compromised treatment efficacy. Conditions under which response interruption procedures are likely to be effective and possible strategies to increase the effectiveness of response interruption are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., MacDonald, R. P. F., & Chung, B. I. (2007) Assessing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 263–275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Fazzini, D. (1969). Density and delay of punishment of free—operant avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 1029–1037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Lindover, S. E., Alterson, C. J. & Thompson, R. H. (1998). Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 513–527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Kuhn, D. E., Thompson, R. H. (1998). Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 543–560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24, 3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, G. (1984). Learning due to the response—shock contingency in signaled punishment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 36B, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Contrucci Kuhn, S. A., Long, E. S., Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: Using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforce density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., Thompson, R. H., & Lindberg, J. S., (2000). A component analysis of “stereotypy as reinforcement” for alternative behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 285–297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K.E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self—injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 131–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lalli, J. S., Livezey, K., & Kates, K. (1996). Functional analysis and treatment of eye poking with response blocking. Journal of Applied Beahvior Analysis, 29(1), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C. & Iwata, B. A. (1996). A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 231–233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, B. E., Grosser, J. W., Iwata, B. A., & Powers, L. A. (2005). An analysis of response—blocking parameters in the prevention of pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 391–394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, C. C., Adelinis, J. D., Hanley, G. P., Goh, H., & Delia, M. D. (2000). An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 13–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., & Fisher, W. W. (1996). Functional analysis and treatment of cigarette pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 437–450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H., Parson, M. B., Phillips, J. F., & Green, C. W. (1993). Reduction of self—injurious hand mouthing using response blocking, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 139–140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds G.S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 57–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rincover, A., Cook, R., Peoples, A., & Packard, D. (1979). Sensory extinction and sensory reinforcement principles for programming multiple adaptive behavior change. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 221–233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Slifer, K. J., Iwata, B. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1984). Reduction of eye gouging using a response interruption procedure. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 15, 369–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. G., Russo, L., & Le, D. D. (1999) Distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects of response blocking: a replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 367–370.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bessette, K. K. (2006). Incorporating descriptive assessment outcomes into the design of functional analysis: A case example. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, T. R. (1994). The concept of automatic reinforcement: Implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 187–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey H. Tiger.

Additional information

This study was conducted in partial completion of the requirements for the Masters of Arts in School Psychology degree from Louisiana State University by the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kliebert, M.L., Tiger, J.H. & Toussaint, K.A. An Approach to Identifying the Conditions Under Which Response Interruption Will Reduce Automatically Reinforced Problem Behavior. Behav Analysis Practice 4, 17–26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391771

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391771

Keywords

Navigation