Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment Integrity, Commission Errors, and Reinstatement: A Primer

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Education and Treatment of Children Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of problem behavior, treatment integrity refers to the extent to which a behavioral intervention is implemented as intended. Treatment-integrity errors may lead to relapse of problem behavior. For example, omitting reinforcers can lead to increases in problem behavior called resurgence. Researchers have previously described the clinical implications of omitted reinforcers and resurgence, including a variety of methods for mitigating resurgence. However, omission errors are not the only type of treatment-integrity errors. Delivery of unplanned reinforcers (a commission error) can lead to recurrence of problem behavior through reinstatement. Unlike omitted reinforcers and resurgence, the research base on commission errors and reinstatement of problem behavior is limited. In this article, we describe a few considerations relevant to reinstatement as it applies to commission errors and clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Any data or information beyond that described herein are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Note that, for ease of interpretation, we use simply “reinstatement” to broadly refer to response-dependent reinstatement within the context of commission errors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chris Podlesnik, Dan Mitteer, and Harriet de Wit for their correspondence during the preparation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Kranak.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

No human subjects were involved in the preparation of this manuscript, thus informed consent was not necessary.

Competing Interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding authors declares there are no conflicts of or competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1604 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kranak, M.P., Falligant, J.M. Treatment Integrity, Commission Errors, and Reinstatement: A Primer. Educ. Treat. Child. 46, 249–262 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-023-00104-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-023-00104-x

Keywords

Navigation