Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Frequenzeffekte in der Satzverarbeitung. Wie Erfahrung den Erwerb und die Verarbeitung von Sprache beeinflusst

Frequency Effects in Sentence Processing. How Experience Influences the Acquisition and Processing of Language

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distributional properties of language and the implicit acquisition of knowledge about these properties influences human language processing. Connectionist approaches of sentence processing provide a paradigm that places the role of frequency at the core of psycholinguistic reasoning. We introduce this paradigm and some of its consequences by focusing on simple recurrent networks (Elman 1990) and the processing differences of relative clauses (MacDonald/Christiansen 2002). An effect of frequency that is predicted by connectionist models–but not by classical, computational symbol processing models–is the interference of so-called ›local syntactic coherences‹: embedded sequences that have–if they occur in isolation–a particular interpretation. However, embedded in a complex sentence, this interpretation is incorrect because the preceding context of the global sentence renders it ungrammatical. It has been shown in both reading- and visual world studies that the local, syntactically invalid analysis of such sequences is in fact processed, interferes with the globally correct analysis, and can even influence interpretational processes. This is remarkable since such effects seem to be in conflict with fundamental assumptions about economical language processing. In addition, we show that the amount of ›distraction‹ that the local sequence causes depends on the tendency of the local sequence towards the local analysis, where this tendency was measured by examining corpus data. We take these effects as strong evidence in favour of processing accounts that do not take effects of distributional properties in processing as mere phenomena of ›performance‹ but rather as results of the fundamental mechanisms and processes language acquisition and processing are built on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Anderson, John R.: Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R./ Lebiere, Christian: The atomic components of thought. Mahwah. NJ 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R./ Bothell, Daniel/ Byrne, Michael D./ Douglass, Scott/ Lebiere, Christian/ Qin, Yulin: »An Integrated Theory of the Mind«. In: Psychological Review 111/4 (2004), S. 1036–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auer, Peter: »On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language«. In: Language Sciences 31 (2009), S. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever, Thomas G.: »The cognitive basis for linguistic structures«. In: John R. Hayes (Hg.): Cognition and the development of language, Bd. 279. New York, NY 1970, S. 279–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, Klinton/ Levy, Roger: »A model of local coherence effects in human sentence processing as consequences of updates from bottom-up prior to posterior beliefs«. In: Proceedings of North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT) 2009 conference. Boulder, CO 2009, S. 665–673.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, Klinton/ Levy, Roger/ Demberg, Vera: »Correcting the incorrect: Local coherence effects modeled with prior belief update«. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS). Berkeley, CA 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Morten H./ Chater, Nick: »Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance«. In: Cognitive Science 23/2 (1999), S. 157–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Roger M.: »The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing«. In: Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974), S. 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, Steffan/ Crocker, Matthew W.: »The modular statistical hypothesis: Exploring lexikal category ambiguity«. In: Matthew W. Crocker/ Martin Pickering/ Charles Clifton (Hg.): Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge UK 2000, S. 135–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, Meredith/ Carpenter, Patricia A.: »Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading«. In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19/4 (1980), S. 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Jeffrey L.: »Finding structure in time«. In: Cognitive Science 14 (1990), S. 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Jeffrey L.: »Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small«. In: Cognition 48 (1993), S. 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Jeffrey L.: »An alternative view of the mental lexicon«. In: Trends in Cognitive Science 8/7 (2004), S. 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Jeffrey L.: »On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon«. In: Cognitive Science 33/4 (2009), S. 547–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, Jeffrey L./ Bates, Elizabeth A./ Johnson, Mark H./ Karmiloff-Smith, Annette: Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge MA 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Lyn: »Sentence processing: A tutorial review«. In: M. Coltheart (Hg.): Attention and Performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ 1987, S. 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Lyn/ Fodor, Janet D.: »The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model«. In: Cognition 6/4 (1978), S. 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward: »Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies«. In: Cognition 68 (1998), S. 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward: »The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-based Theory of Linguistic Complexity«. In: Alec Marantz/ Yasushi Miyashita/ Wayne O’Neil (Hg.): Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium. Cambridge, MA 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward: »The interaction of top-down and bottom-up statistics in the resolution of syntactic category ambiguity«. In: Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006), S. 363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Peter C./ Hendrick, Randall/ Johnson, Marcus: »Memory interference during language processing«. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001), S. 1411–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, John T.: »A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model«. In: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA 2001, S. 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, John T.: »What a rational parser would do«. In: Cognitive Science 35/3 (2011), S. 399–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, John A.: Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jurafsky, Dan: »A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation«. In: Cognitive Science 20/2 (1996), S. 137–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, Marcel A./ Carpenter, Patricia A.: »A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory«. In: Psycholocigal Review 99/1 (1992), S. 122–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Jonathan/ Just, Marcel A.: »Individual differences in syntactic processing: the role of working memory«. In: Journal of Memory and Language 30/5 (1991), S. 580–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, Lars: »The psychological reality of local coherences in sentence processing«. In: Bruno Bara/ Larry Barsalou/ Monica Bucciarelli (Hg.): Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ 2005, S. 1178–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, Lars/ Müller, Daniel/ Baumann, Peter/ Hachmann, Wibke/ Wolfer, Sascha: »Local syntactic coherence interpretation, and how prosody modulates it.« Posterpräsentation auf der 22nd Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. 26.–28. März 2009. Davis, CA 2009b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, Lars/ Müller, Daniel/ Hachmann, Wibke/ Schwarzkopf, Sarah/ Wolfer, Sascha: »Local syntactic coherence interpretation. Evidence from a visual world study«. In: N. A. Taatgen/ H. van Rijn (Hg.): Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX 2009, S. 1133–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, Lars/ Ruh, Nicolas/ Müller, Daniel: »What’s in an error? A closer look at SRNs processing relative clauses«. In: Andrew Howes/ David Peebles/ Richard P. Cooper (Hg.): Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. Manchester, UK 2009, S. 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, Lars/ Weldle, Helmut/ Wolfer, Sascha/ Müller, Daniel/ Baumann, Peter/ Feldmeth, Anne Karina/ Kühner, David/ Teske, Minkus: »Local coherences interfere with online anaphora resolution. « Posterpräsentation auf der 15th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 09). 7.–9. September 2009. Barcelona 2009c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukona, Anuenue/ Tabor, Whitney: »Impulse processing: A dynamical systems model of incremental eye movements in the visual world paradigm«. In: Cognitive Science 35 (2011), S. 1009–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Roger: »Expectation-based syntactic comprehension«. In: Cognition 106/3 (2008a), S. 1126–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Roger: »A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input«. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Waikiki/Honululu, Hawai 2008b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Richard L./ Vasishth, Shravan: »An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval«. In: Cognitive Science 29/3 (2005), S. 375–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Maryellen C./ Pearlmutter, Neil J./ Seidenberg, Mark S.: »The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution«. In: Psychological Review 101 (1994), S. 676–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Maryellen C./ Christiansen, Morten H.: »Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996)«. In: Psychological Review 109/1 (2002), S. 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Daniel/ Hachmann, Wibke/ Konieczny, Lars: »Local syntactic and semantic coherence in reading«. Posterpräsentation auf der 15th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 09), 7.–9. September 2009. Barcelona 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Feldmeth, Daniel/ Baumann, Peter/ Wolfer, Sascha/ Konieczny, Lars: »A connectionist model of graded effects in local syntactic coherence interpretation«. Posterpräsentation auf der 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. 14.–16. März 2012. New York, NY 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, Mark S./ McClelland, James L.: »A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming«. In: Psychological Review 96/4 (1989), S. 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, Michael J.: The Continuity of Mind. New York, NY 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, Whitney: »Lexical Change as Nonlinear Interpolation«. In: J. D. Moore/ J. F. Lehman (Hg.): Proceedings of the 17th Annual Cognitive Science Conference. Hillsdale, NJ 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, Whitney/ Bruno Galantucci/ Daniel Richardson: »Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing«, in: Journal of Memory and Language, 50/4 (2004), S. 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, John C./ Tanenhaus, Michael C.: »Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution.«. In: Charles Clifton/ Lyn Frazier/ Keith Rayner (Hg.): Perspectives in Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ 1994, S. 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, Julie A.: »Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing«. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33/2 (2007), S. 407–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, Tim: »The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science«. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21/5 (1998), S. 615–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldle, Helmut/ Konieczny, Lars/ Müller, Daniel/ Wolfer, Sascha, Baumann, Peter: »Connectionist modeling of situated language processing: Language and meaning acquisition from an embodiment perspective«. In: N. A. Taatgen/ H. van Rijn (Hg.): Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX 2009, S. 827–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Justine B./ Christiansen, Morten H./ Race, David S./ Acheson, Daniel J./ MacDonald, Maryellen C.: »Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension«. In: Cognitive Psychology 58 (2009), S. 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, Rolf A./ Madden, Carol J.: »Embodied sentence comprehension«. In: Diane Pecher/ Rolf D. Zwaan (Hg.): Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge, UK 2005, S. 224–245.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduiertenkolleg DFG GRK 1624, »Frequenzeffekte in der Sprache«, Starkenstr. 44, D-79104, Freiburg, Deutschland

    Daniel Müller-Feldmeth

  2. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Zentrum für Kognitionswissenschaft, Friedrichstr. 50, D-79098, Freiburg, Deutschland

    Lars Konieczny

Authors
  1. Daniel Müller-Feldmeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lars Konieczny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Müller-Feldmeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller-Feldmeth, D., Konieczny, L. Frequenzeffekte in der Satzverarbeitung. Wie Erfahrung den Erwerb und die Verarbeitung von Sprache beeinflusst. Z Literaturwiss Linguistik 43, 96–121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379875

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379875

Search

Navigation