Abstract
The ability to construct an indefinite number of ideas by combining a finite set of elements in a hierarchically structured sequence is a signal characteristic of human cognition. To illustrate, consider the sentence The girl who kissed the boy closed the door. It is immediately clear to any proficient English speaker that the state of affairs described by this sentence is that the girl is doing the closing. This specific interpretation is as effortless as automatic, and if anybody interpreted it any differently it might be sufficient grounds for doubting her proficiency of the English language. Nonetheless, one might wonder why, for example, we do not interpret the noun phrase the boy as being the subject of the verb phrase closed the door. After all, the boy is linearly much more proximal to the verb phrase than is the girl. Furthermore, the sentence actually even contains the well-formed fragment […] the boy closed the door, in which, of course, it is the boy doing the closing. Yet, when we consider the full sentence, the relative linear proximity of its component elements does not appear to guide our interpretation. How is it then that we so effortlessly and automatically interpret the sentence above as describing a state of affairs in which a (certain) girl, who just so happens to have given a kiss to a (certain) boy, has closed the door? One explanation, which is perhaps the founding intuition of the modern study of language as a mental phenomenon, is that despite the fact that language is typically manifested as a temporally linear sequence of utterances, in our mind we spontaneously build a rich abstract hierarchical representation of how each discrete element within the sequence relates to every other element. It is the building of these abstract representations that allows us to assign meaning to strings of utterances. Although this ability is most prominently displayed in our use of natural language, it also characterizes several other aspects of human cognition such as logic reasoning, number and music cognition, action sequences and spatial relations, among others. As I will describe below, at least at an intuitive level, these seemingly distant domains of human cognition all appear to be organized at an abstract level and might therefore share, hidden behind a linear surface structure, the hierarchical and recursive features that are most commonly described by the syntactic trees built by linguists (see Fig. 5.1 for an example).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As described below, given that deductive reasoning is most often elicited by the means of verbal stimuli, it is trivial that linguistic processes are needed to apprehend the stimuli. What is under discussion here is whether linguistic processes play a role in deductive reasoning beyond the initial encoding of verbal materials.
- 2.
It might be worth clarifying that so-called Mental Rules theories of deduction (e.g., Osherson and Falmagne 1975), despite being sometimes portrayed as language based (see Goel et al. 1998, 2000), might in fact be better understood as describing deductive inference as a “syntax-like,” algebraic, computation, rather than a linguistic one (cf., Monti et al. 2007).
References
Beall, J. C., & van Fraassen, B. C. (2003). Possibilities and paradox: An introduction to modal and many-valued logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bekinschtein, T. A., Davis, M. H., Rodd, J. M., & Owen, A. M. (2011). Why clowns taste funny: The relationship between humor and semantic ambiguity. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9665–9671.
Bellugi, U., Marks, A. B., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1993). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (p. 177–189). Hove: Psychology.
Ben-Shachar, M., Hendler, T., Kahn, I., Ben-Bashat, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2003). The neural reality of syntactic transformations evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychological Science, 14, 433–440.
Bloom, P. (1994). Generativity within language and other cognitive domains. Cognition, 51, 177–189.
Boeckx, C. (2010). Language in cognition: Uncovering mental structures and the rules behind them. Malden: Wiley.
Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188.
Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 26, 221–233.
Butterworth, B. (2008). Developmental dyscalculia. In J. Reed & J. Warner-Rogers (Eds.) Child neuropsychology: Concepts, theory, and practice (pp. 357–374). Chichester: Wiley.
Canessa, N., Gorini, A., Cappa, S. F., Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Danna, M., Fazio, F., et al. (2005). The effect of social content on deductive reasoning: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 30–43.
Cappelletti, M., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2001). Spared numerical abilities in a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1224–1239.
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
Chomsky, N. (1983). Noam Chomsky’s views on the psychology of language and thought. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Dialogues on the psychology of language and thought: Conversations with Noam Chomsky, Charles Osgood, Jean Piaget, Ulric Neisser, and Marcel Kinsbourne. New York: Plenium.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures (Vol. 16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corballis, M. C. (1992). On the evolution of language and generativity. Cognition, 44, 197–226.
Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24, 427–432.
Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218–224.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
Delazer, M., Girelli, L., Semenza, C., & Denes, G. (1999). Numerical skills and aphasia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 213–221.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & D’Ausilio, A. (2009). Broca’s area in language, action, and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 448–458.
Fangmeier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C. C., & Sloutsky, V. (2006). fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 320–334.
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97, 179–210.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought (Vol. 5). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Friederici, A. D. (2004). Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 245–247.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concepts. Science, 306, 441–443.
Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. Neuroimage, 12, 504–514.
Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 39, 901–909.
Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87, B11–B22.
Goel, V., Gold, B., Kapur, S., & Houle, S. (1997). The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning. NeuroReport, 8, 1305–1310.
Goel, V., Gold, B., Kapur, S., & Houle, S. (1998). Neuroanatomical correlates of human reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 293–302.
Grice, H. P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grodzinsky, Y., & Santi, A. (2008). The battle for Broca’s region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 474–480.
Grosenick, L., Clement, T. S., & Fernald, R. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445, 429–432.
Hadamard, J. (1954). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Mineola: Courier Corporation.
Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416–423.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Hoenig, K., & Scheef, L. (2005). Mediotemporal contributions to semantic processing: fMRI evidence from ambiguity processing during semantic context verification. Hippocampus, 15, 597–609.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114.
Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. (2003). Reasoning, models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 559–573.
Koscik, T. R., & Tranel, D. (2012). The human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is critical for transitive inference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1191–1204.
Lees, R. B., & Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Language, 33, 375–408.
Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83, 265–294.
Locke, J. (1824). The works of John Locke in nine volumes. London: Rivington.
Losonsky, M. (1999). Humboldt: ‘On language’: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maruyama, M., Pallier, C., Jobert, A., Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2012). The cortical representation of simple mathematical expressions. Neuroimage, 61, 1444–1460.
Monti, M. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2012). Logic, language and the brain. Brain Research, 1428, 33–42.
Monti, M. M., Osherson, D. N., Martinez, M. J., & Parsons, L. M. (2007). Functional neuroanatomy of deductive inference: A language-independent distributed network. Neuroimage, 37, 1005–1016.
Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2009). The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12554–12559.
Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2012). Thought beyond language neural dissociation of algebra and natural language. Psychological Science, 23(8), 914–922.
Noveck, I. A., Goel, V., & Smith, K. W. (2004). The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content. Cortex, 40, 613–622.
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 906–924.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(24), 9868–9872.
Osherson, D., & Falmagne, R. (1975). Logic and models of logical thinking. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults (pp. 81–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. (2001). New evidence for distinct right and left brain systems for deductive versus probabilistic reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 954–965.
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236.
Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533.
Prado, J., & Noveck, I. A. (2007). Overcoming perceptual features in logical reasoning: A parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 642–657.
Prado, J., Van Der Henst, J.-B., & Noveck, I. A. (2010a). Recomposing a fragmented literature: How conditional and relational arguments engage different neural systems for deductive reasoning. Neuroimage, 51, 1213–1221.
Prado, J., Noveck, I. A., & Van Der Henst, J.-B. (2010b). Overlapping and distinct neural representations of numbers and verbal transitive series. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 720–729.
Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: Contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 335–359.
Reverberi, C., Cherubini, P., Frackowiak, R. S., Caltagirone, C., Paulesu, E., & Macaluso, E. (2010). Conditional and syllogistic deductive tasks dissociate functionally during premise integration. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1430–1445.
Reverberi, C., Cherubini, P., Rapisarda, A., Rigamonti, E., Caltagirone, C., Frackowiak, R. S., et al. (2007). Neural basis of generation of conclusions in elementary deduction. Neuroimage, 38, 752–762.
Reverberi, C., Shallice, T., D’Agostini, S., Skrap, M., & Bonatti, L. L. (2009). Cortical bases of elementary deductive reasoning: Inference, memory, and metadeduction. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1107–1116.
Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rodriguez-Moreno, D., & Hirsch, J. (2009). The dynamics of deductive reasoning: An fMRI investigation. Neuropsychologia, 47(4), 949–961.
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., & Halgren, E. (2006). Abstract grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in Broca’s area: Evidence from fMRI. Cortex, 42, 540–562.
Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5, 207–214.
Sapir, E. (1931). Conceptual categories in primitive languages. Science, 74(1927), 578.
Spelke, E. S. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277–311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition, 78, 45–88.
Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia. Brain, 123, 2240–2255.
Tettamanti, M., & Weniger, D. (2006). Broca’s area: A supramodal hierarchical processor? Cortex, 42, 491–494.
Uddén, J., & Bahlmann, J. (2012). A rostro-caudal gradient of structured sequence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2023–2032.
Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10, 723–726.
Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J., Romanowski, C. A., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3519–3524.
Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., Kreifelts, B., & Ethofer, T. (2006). Cerebral processing of linguistic and emotional prosody: fMRI studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 249–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monti, M.M. (2017). The Role of Language in Structure-Dependent Cognition. In: Mody, M. (eds) Neural Mechanisms of Language. Innovations in Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7325-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7325-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7323-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7325-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)