Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der Einfluss der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung auf die Präsenz von Frauen in Aufsichtsräten

  • Aufsichtsrat
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Deutsche Corporate Governance Kodex fordert, „bei der Besetzung des Vorstands und Aufsichtsrats auf eine ausreichende Vielfalt“ zu achten. Mit einem Frauenanteil von knapp 4% auf der Kapitalseite deutscher Aufsichtsräte war man von diesem Ziel im Jahr 2007 noch weit entfernt. Diese Studie analysiert, welche Dimensionen der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung diesen geringen Anteil von Frauen im Aufsichtsrat erklären. Die Analysen umfassen die in den Jahren 1998 bis 2007 im CDAX gelisteten Unternehmen. Es zeigt sich, dass insbesondere die Zugehörigkeit zum eng verflochtenen Netz deutscher Aufsichtsräte einen negativen Effekt auf die Präsenz von Frauen auf der Kapitalseite von Aufsichtsräten hat. Demgegenüber hat der Anteil von Männern, die bereits Erfahrungen mit weiblichen Aufsichtsräten der Kapitalseite gemacht haben, einen positiven Einfluss. Ein solcher positiver Effekt geht auch von Frauen auf der Arbeitnehmerseite aus.

Abstract

The German Corporate Governance Codex stresses adequate consideration in supervisory boards. Empirical data indicates that there is still a long way to go: Currently, in German listed firm only some 4% of supervisory board members are female. Our paper analyses which dimensions of board characteristics (e.g., board networks or codetermination) explain this low portion. Our analyses are based on 44,596 supervisory board member positions and include approximately 600 German listed companies from 1998 to 2007. We find that the probability of having a female shareholder representative increases if the male directors already had the chance to experience a female director and if we can find women among employee representatives. In contrast, it decreases with the degree of centrality of the supervisory board within the “old boys’ network”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adams, Renee B./ Ferreira, Daniel (2009), Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94, S. 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Susann M./ Flynn, Patricia M. (2005), Local Knowledge Advances Women’s Access to Corporate Boards, in: Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13, S. 836–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, Ruth V./ Filatotchev, Igor/ Gospel, Howard/ Jackson, Gregory (2008), An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities, in: Organization Science, Vol. 19, S. 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguliera, Ruth V./ Jackson, Gregory (2003), The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appold, Stephen J./ Siengthai, Sununta/ Kasarda, John D. (1998), The Employment of Women Managers and Professionals in an Emerging Economy: Gender Inequality as an Organizational Practice, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, S. 538–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aretz, Hans-Jürgen/ Hansen, Katrin (2003), Erfolgreiches Management von Diversity. Die multikulturelle Organisation als Strategie zur Verbesserung einer nachhaltigen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, in: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 17. Jg., S. 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arfken, Deborah E./ Bellar, Stephanie. L./ Helms, Marilyn M. (2004), The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 50, S. 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autenrieth, Christine/ Domsch, Michel, E./ Pfeiffer, Petra (1994), Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung von weiblichen Führungskräften und Führungsnachwuchskräften in der Wirtschaft, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 64. Jg., S. 1373–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen. R./ Tolbert, Pamela S. (1997), Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 18, S. 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, James N./ Mittman, Brian S./ Newman Andrew E. (1991), Targets of Opportunity: Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Gender Integration within the California Civil Services, 1976–1985, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 96, S. 1362–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. (1964), Human capital, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. (1985), Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor, in: Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, S. 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Walther (2010), Frauenpower elektrisiert Vorstands-Mannschaft, in: Börsenzeitung, 14. Mai 2010, S. 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, Phillip (1972), Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, in: Journal of Mathematical Sociology Vol. 2, S. 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, Phillip (1987), Power and Centrality: A family of measures, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, S. 1170–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Hannah R./ Babcock, Linda/ Lai, Lei (2007), Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 103, S. 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, Stephen/ Millington, Andrew/ Pavelon, Stephen (2009), Corporate Reputation and Women on the Board, in: British Journal of Management, Vol. 20, S. 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, Lisa L. (2008), The Corporate Board Room: Still a Male Club, in: Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 33, S. 665–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Ronald J. (1997), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: A Needed Resource, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 16, S. 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L. (2007), Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, David A./ Simkins, Betty J./ Simpson, W. Gary (2003), Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value, in: The Financial Review, Vol. 38, S. 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, Julie/ Renaud, Stephane/ Morin, Lucie (2008), Predictors of Participation in Voluntary Vocational Training: An Empirical Study Among Canadian Female and Male Managers in: Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Vol. 63, S. 268–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, Stephen/ Loury, Glenn C. (1993), Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes?, in: The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, S. 1220–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsun, David L./ Costen, Wanda M. (2001), Is the Glass Ceiling unbreakable?, in: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 10, S. 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, Catherine M./ Certo, S. Trevis/ Dalton, Dan R. (1999), A Decade of Corporate Women: Some Progress in the Boardroom, None in the Executive Suite, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, S. 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Catherine M. (2007), Queen bees: All sting, no honey, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 50, S. 349–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Börse AG (2008), Börsenordnung für die Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse, Stand: 28. April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (2008), Stellungnahme des DGB für die Anhörung im Rechtsausschuss des Deutschen Bundestages am 7. Mai 2008 zum Antrag der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen „Quote für Aufsichtsratsgremien börsennotierter Unternehmen einführen“, in: DGB Drucksache, (16/5279), S. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./ Powell, Walter W. (1983), The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Jane E./ Ashford, Susan J./ Lawrence, Katherine A./ Miner-Rubino, Kathi (2002), Red Light, Green Light: Making Sense of the Organizational Context for Issue Selling, in: Organization Science, Vol. 13, S. 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, Robin J. (1995), The power in Demography: Women’s Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, S. 589–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Kathleen A./ Hersch, Philip L. (2005), Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender, in Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 11, S. 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing, Marion/ Okech, Jana (2007), Vertikale Arbeitsmarktsegmentation nach dem Geschlecht? Ein neoinstitutionalistischer Erklärungsversuch am Beispiel Deutschlands und Schwedens, in: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 21. Jg., S. 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fich, Eliezer M./ Shivdasani, Anil (2006), Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?, in: Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, S. 689–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy, Felix R./ Kraft, Kornelius (1993), Economic Effects of Codetermination, in: The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, S. 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Egon/ Jungwirth, Carola (1998), Vorurteile als Karrierebremse? Ein Versuch zur Erklärung des Glass Ceiling-Phänomens, in: zfbf, 50. Jg., S. 1083–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, David A. (2006), On the so-called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors”, in: American Statistician, Vol. 60, S. 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, Gerald E./ Lerner, Linda D. (1989), Contrasting Corporate Profiles: Women and Minority Representation in Top Management Positions, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8, 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, B. (1999), Developing effective directors and building dynamic boards, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 32, S. 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Donald E./ Lawrence, Barbara S. (2009), Women’s and Men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations, in it: Organization Science (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Francis (1993), The Determinants of training of male and female employees in Britain, in: Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, Vol. 55, S. 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, William H. (2003). Econometric analysis, 5. Aufl., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, Kathryn R. (1981), Numbers and Positions of Women elected in Corporate Boards, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, S. 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawarden, Rosanne/ Stablein, Ralph E. (2008), New Zealand women directors: many aspire but few succeed, in: Vinnicombe, Susan/ Singh, Val/ Burke, Ronald J./ Bilimoria, Diana/ Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors–International Research and Practice, Cheltenham, S. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, Thomas (2004), Dynamics in the German system of corporate governance? Empirical findings regarding interlocking directorates, in: Economy & Society, Vol. 33, S. 218–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, Magnus/ Stenkula, Mickael (2009), Why are there so few female Top Executives in egalitarian welfare states?, in: The Independent Review, Vol. 14, S. 239–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Amy J./ Shropshire, Christine/ Cannella, Albert A. (2007), Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, S. 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, Michael A./ Ahlstrom, David/ Dacin, M. Tina/ Levitas, Edward/ Svobodina, Lilia (2004), The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia–in: Organization Science, Vol. 15, S. 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, Yael/ Ljungqvist, Alexander/ Lu, Yang (2007), Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance, in: Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, S. 251–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, Marit (2008), The quota story: five years of change in Norway, in: Vinnicombe, Susan/ Singh, Val/ Burke, Ronald J./ Bilimoria, Diana/ Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors–International Research and Practice, Cheltenham, S. 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, Martin/ Krempel, Lothar (2004), The Politics of the German Company Network, in: Competition & Change, Vol. 8, S. 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoetker, Glenn (2007), The use of Logit and Probit Models in strategic Management Research: Critical Issues, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, S. 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst, Elke/ Schimeta, Julia (2009), Nach wie vor kaum Frauen in den Top-Gremien großer Unternehmen, in: Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin, Nr. 18/2009.

  • Jansen, Simon/ Pfeiffer, Christian (2009), Betriebsinterne Arbeitsmärkte, Hierarchien und Neueinstellungen: Eine empirische Untersuchung mit Personaldaten, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 79. Jg., S. 633–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, Karen A./ Northcraft, Gregory B./ Neale, Margaret A. (1999), Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, S. 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C./ Meckling, William H. (1979), Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor-managed Firms and Codetermination, in: Journal of Business, Vol. 52, S. 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Stefanie K./ Murphy, Susan E./ Zewdie, Selamawit/ Reichard, Rebecca J. (2008), The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 106, S. 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, Lois (2008), Women board directors in the United States: an eleven year retrospective, in: Vinnicombe, Susan/ Singh, Val/ Burke, Ronald J./ Bilimoria, Diana/ Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors–International Research and Practice, Cheltenham, S. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, Alexandra/ Dobbin, Frank/ Kelly, Erin (2006) Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 71, S. 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1976), The impact of hierarchical structures on the work behavior of women and men, in: Social Problems, Vol. 23, S. 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1977), Men and women of the corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Thomas/ Gogel, Robert (1981), Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network, in: American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 40, S. 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce/ Walker, Gordon (2001), The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 66, S. 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell, Gertraude (2000), Managing Diversity. Optionen für (mehr) Frauen in Führungspositionen, in: Peters, Sibylle/ Bensel, Norbert (Hrsg.), Frauen und Männer im Management. Diversity in Diskurs und Praxis, Wiesbaden, S. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krell, Gertraude (2008), Programme und Maßnahmen zur Realisierung von Chancengleichheit in deutschen Großunternehmen von Mitte der 1990er Jahre bis 2006–Befragungen der Mitglieder des „Forum Frauen in der Wirtschaft“, in: Krell, Gertraude (Hrsg.), Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik–Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in Unternehmen und Verwaltungen. Rechtliche Regelungen–Problemanalysen–Lösungen, 5. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, Hema A. (2009), What causes turnover among women on top management teams?, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, S. 1181–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, Hema A./ Park, Daewoo (2005), A few good women on top management teams, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, S. 1712–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederle, Sabine (2007), Die Einführung von Diversity Management in deutschen Organisationen: Eine neoinstitutionalistische Perspektive, in: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 21. Jg., S. 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynall, Matthew D./ Golden, Brian R./ Hillman, Amy J. (2003), Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: a Multitheoretic View, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 416–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, Mairi/ Harvey, Charles (2008), Women on corporate boards of directors: the French perspective, in: Vinnicombe, Susan/ Singh, Val/ Burke, Ronald J./ Bilimoria, Diana/ Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors–International Research and Practice, Cheltenham, S. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Miller/ Smith-Lovin, Lynn/ Cook, James M. (2001), Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks, in: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27, S. 415–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Heiner (2007), Co-determination in Germany: The Recent Debate, Working Paper Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, (http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/etes/documents/WDW004.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Georgina (2001), Interlocking directorates: what do they tell about corporate power in Australia, in: Journal of Australian Political Economy, Vol. 47, S. 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Sabina (2009), Women directors, board working style and board task performance, in: Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), The Value Creating Board, London/ New York, S. 437–451.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, Raymond A. (1988), Women and Mentoring: A Review and Research Agenda, in: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, S. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehmichen, Jana/ Rapp, Marc S./ Wolff, Michael (2009), Busy board in a two-tier system: old-boys network or efficient monitoring technology?, Arbeitspapier präsentiert im Rahmen der Jahrestagung der European Economic Association & Econometric Society 2009 in Barcelona (Spanien).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, Elenor (2002), Non-Executive directors on boards in Ireland: co-option, characteristics and contributions, in: Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 10, S. 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Gary N./ Butterfield, Anthony. D. (1994), Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotion to top management, in: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, S. 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randel, Amy E. (2002), Identity Salience: A Moderator of the Relationship between Group Gender Composition and Work Group Conflict, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, S. 749–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, Ray/ Zuckerman, Ezra W. (2001), Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams, in: Organization Science, Vol. 12, S. 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Orlando C./ Barnett, Tim/ Dwyer, Sean/ Chadwick, Ken (2004), Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the moderating Role of Entrepreneural Orientation Dimensions, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, S. 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, Katja/ Osterloh, Margit (2008), You Pay a Fee for Strong Beliefs: Homogeneity as a Driver of Corporate Governance Failure, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühl, Monika (2007), Diversity Management–Erfahrungen mit der Einführung bei Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, in: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 21. Jg., S. 176–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelman, Lee/ Zeng, Langche (1999), Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models, in: Political Analysis, Vol. 8, S. 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süß, Stefan (2008), Diversity-Management auf dem Vormarsch. Eine empirische Analyse der deutschen Unternehmenspraxis, in: zfbf, 60. Jg., S. 406–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri (1982), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, Siri/ Singh, Val (2008), Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 83, S. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, Siri/ Singh, Val/ Vinnicombe, Susan (2008) Do women still lack the ‘right’ kind of human capital for directorships on the FTSE 100 corporate boards?, in: Vinnicombe, Susan/ Singh, Val/ Burke, Ronald J./ Bilimoria, Diana/ Huse, Morten (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors–International Research and Practice, Cheltenham, S. 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharenou, Phyllis (2008), Disruptive decisions to leave home: Gender and family differences in expatriation choices, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 105, S. 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela S. (1985), Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, S. 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael (1982), Classwide Rationality in the Politics of Managers and Directors of Large Corporations in the United States and Great Britain, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, S. 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Dieter/ Sepehri, Payvand (2000), Managing Diversity–Wahrnehmungen und Verständnis im Internationalen Management, in: Personal–Zeitschrift für Human Resource Management, 52. Jg., S. 456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley/ Faust, Katherine (1997), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Rey, Daniela (2009), Änderungen des Deutschen Corporate Governance Kodex 2009, in: Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Bankenrecht–Wertpapiermitteilungen, 63. Jg., S. 2255–2264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, James D./ Milton, Laurie P. (2000), How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, S. 366–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windolf, Paul/ Beyer, Jürgen (1996), Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain, in: The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 47, S. 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Unternehmensführung, Postfach 6980, 76128, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Jana Oehmichen (Dipl.-Wi.-Ing.)

  2. Technische Universität München, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS), Arcisstrasse 21, 80333, München, Deutschland

    Marc Steffen

  3. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Unternehmensführung, Postfach 6980, 76128, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Michael Wolff

Authors
  1. Jana Oehmichen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Steffen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Wolff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Oehmichen.

Additional information

Wir danken den anonymen Gutachtern für hilfreiche Anmerkungen und Hinweise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oehmichen, J., Steffen, M. & Wolff, M. Der Einfluss der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung auf die Präsenz von Frauen in Aufsichtsräten. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 62, 503–532 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372834

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372834

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation