Abstract
We consider the current debate between bioconservatives and their chief opponents — whom we dub bioliberals — about the moral acceptability of human enhancement and the policy implications of moral debates about enhancement. We argue that this debate has reached an impasse, largely because bioconservatives hold that we should honour intuitions about the special value of being human, even if we cannot identify reasons to ground those intuitions. We argue that although intuitions are often a reliable guide to belief and action, there are circumstances in which they are not reliable. Intuitions — including intuitions about enhancement — are subject to various cognitive biases rendering them unreliable in some circumstances. We argue that many bioconservative intuitions about enhancement are examples of such unreliable intuitions. Given this, it is unrealistic of bioconservatives to expect others to rely on their unexamined intuitions. Furthermore, refusing to engage in debates about the reasons and values that underpin their intuitions about enhancement will have the effect of making bioconservative voices less relevant in policy debates about enhancement than they would otherwise be.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bostrom, N. 2003. ‘The Transhumanist FAQ’, version 2.1 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html.
Bostrom, N. 2005. ‘In defense of posthuman dignity’. Bioethics 19(3): 202–214.
Bostrom, N.; Roache, R. 2007. ‘Ethical issues in human enhancement’. In New Waves in Applied Ethics, edited by Ryberg, J.; Petersen, T.S.; Wolf, C. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmill
Brandt, R. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, R; Sahakian, B.J; Matthews, K et al. 1997. ‘Effects of methylphenidate on spatial working memory and planning in healthy young adults’. Psychopharmacology 131(2): 196–206.
Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gilovich, T.; Griffin, D; Kahneman, D. (eds). 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glover, J. 2006. Choosing Children: The Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haidt, J. 2001. ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to rational judgement’. Psychological Review 108: 814–834.
Haidt, J; Graham, J. 2007. ‘When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that Liberals may not recognize’. Social Justice Research 20(1): 98–116.
Haidt, J; Joseph, C 2004. ‘Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues’. Daedalus 133: 55–66.
Haidt, J; Koller, S.H; Dias, M.G 1993. ‘Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 613–628.
Huxley, A. 1998 [1932]. Brave New World. New York: Harper Perennial.
Kass, L. 1997. ‘The wisdom of repugnance’. The New Republic 2 June: 17–26.
Kass, L. 2003. ‘Ageless bodies, happy souls: Biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection’. The New Atlantis. Spring: 9–28.
Kekes, J. 1998. A Case for Conservatism. New York: Cornell University Press.
Kleinmuntz, B. 1990. ‘Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach’. Psychological Bulletin 107: 296–310.
Kramer, P. 1993. Listening to Prozac. New York: Penguin.
Levin, Y. 2003. ‘The paradox of conservative bioethics’. The New Atlantis Spring: 53–65.
Levy, N. 2006. ‘Cognitive scientific challenges to morality’. Philosophical Psychology 19(5): 567–587.
Muller, U; Steffenhagen, N; Regenthal, R; Bublak, P. 2004. ‘Effects of Modafinil on working memory processes in humans’. Psychopharmacology 177(1–2): 161–169.
Nicol, C. 2007. ‘Brave New World at 75’. The New Atlantis Spring: 41–54.
Rawls, J. 1951. ‘Outline of a decision procedure for ethics’. Philosophical Review 60: 1–19.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Ross W.D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon.
Sandel, M. 2004. ‘The case against perfection’. The Atlantic April: 1–11.
Sandel, M. 2007. The Case Against Perfection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Savulescu, J; Foddy, B; Clayton, M 2004. ‘Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport’. British Journal of Sports Medicine 38: 666–670.
Schwarz, N.; Vaughn, L.A. 2002. ‘The availability heuristic revisited’. In Gilovich, T.; Griffin, D; Kahneman, D. (eds). 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, pp. 103–119. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scruton, R. 2001. The Meaning of Conservatism. 3rd edition. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Selgelid, M. 2002. ‘Social decision making and the new eugenics’. Europäische Akademie, Graue Reihe, Band 30. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.europaeische-akademie-aw.de/pages/publikationen/graue_reihe.php?lang=DE.
Singer, P 2005. ‘Ethics and intuitions’. The Journal of Ethics 9: 331–452.
Slovic, P.; Finucane, M.; Peters, E.; MacGregor, D.G. 2002. ‘The affect heuristic’. In Gilovich, T.; Griffin, D; Kahneman, D. (eds). 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, pp. 397–420. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Starr, C. 1969. ‘Social benefit versus technological risk’. Science 165: 1232–1238.
Sunstein, C. 2005. ‘Moral heuristics’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 531–573.
Thomson, J.J. 1971. ‘A defense of abortion’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1): 47–66.
Turner, D.C; Robbins, T.W; Clark, L.; et. al. 2003. ‘Cognitive enhancing effects of Modafinil in healthy volunteers’. Psychopharmacology 165(3): 260–269.
Tversky, A; Kahneman, D. 1973. ‘Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability’. Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232.
Wilson, T.D.; Centerbar, D.B.; Brekke, N. 2002. ‘Mental contamination and the debiasing problem’. In Gilovich, T.; Griffin, D; Kahneman, D. (eds). 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, pp. 185–200. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roache, R., Clarke, S. Bioconservatism, Bioliberalism, and the Wisdom of Reflecting on Repugnance. Monash Bioethics Review 28, 1–21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351306
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351306