Abstract
The ongoing discussion regarding the propriety of cognitive enhancement is, at its core, biopolitical. In an attempt to understand the underlying issues, it is instructive to view the subject through the perspectives of those at the extremes – the Transhumanists who enthusiastically support the development of cognitive enhancement and the Bioconservatives who view the enterprise with disapprobation. I argue that many of the positions undertaken by proponents of either view are influenced to a considerable degree by a variety of pre-existing political positions as much as, if not more so than, by deeper philosophical reflection, a phenomenon very much in keeping with Jonathan Haidt’s social intuitionist model of moral reasoning (Haidt, Psychol Rev 108:814–834, 2001). Despite the vocal nature of the extremes, there also exists a broad middle ground which I term The view from reasonableness which is much less of a polemic and more of a conversation. Given that the ultimate outcome rests more on how the populace responds than the views of experts, I suggest that supplementing normative claims driven by biopolitical intuitions with empirical data on public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement might allow us to move beyond polemics to deepen our appreciation of how to move forward.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agar N (2007) Whereto Transhumanism? The literature reaches a critical mass. Hastings Cent Rep 37:12–17
Baily D, Sandberg A, Alves G, More M, Wagner H, Vita-More N, Leitl E, Staring B, Pearce D, Fantegrossi B et al (1998) Transhumanist declaration. http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/
Baker S (2009) Building a better brain. Discover 30:54–59
Bolt I, Schermer M (2009) Psychopharmaceutical enhancers: enhancing identity? Neuroethics 2:103–111
Bostrom N, Ord T (2006) The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. Ethics 116:656–679
Bostrom N, Sandberg A (2009) Cognitive enhancement: methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Sci Eng Ethics 15:311–341
Cascio J (2009) Get smarter. Atlantic 304:94–100
Chatterjee A (2004) Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology 63:968–974
Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25:228–245
Erler A (2011) Does memory modification threaten our authenticity? Neuroethics 4:235–249
Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan RM, Gardner H, Kandel ER, King P, Parens E, Sahakian B, Wolpe PR (2004) Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 5:421–425
Faust H (2008) Should we select for genetic moral enhancement? A thought experiment using the MoralKinder (MK+) haplotype. Theor Med Bioeth 29:397–416
Franke AG, Bonertz C, Christmann M, Huss M, Fellgiebel A, Hildt E, Lieb K (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44:60–66
Garreau J (2006) A dose of genius: “smart pills” are on the rise. But is taking them wise. Washington Post, June 11, 2006, D01
Glannon W (2006) Psychopharmacology and memory. J Med Ethics 32:74–78
Greely HT (2010) Enhancing brains: what are we afraid of? Cerebrum. http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=28786
Greely HT, Sahakian B, Harris J, Kessler RC, Gazzaniga MS, Campbell P, Farah MJ (2008) Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456:702–705
Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834
Hall S (2003) The quest for a smart pill. Sci Am 289:54–65
Hamilton R, Messing S, Chatterjee A (2011) Rethinking the thinking cap: ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation. Neurology 76:187–193
Harris J (2010) Enhancements are a moral obligation. Wellcome Sci 1:16–17
Hughes J (2009) Technoprogressive biopolitics and human enhancement. In: Moreno JD, Berger S (eds) Progress in bioethics: science, policy, and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 163–188
Hughes J (2010) Contradictions from the enlightenment roots of transhumanism. J Med Philos 35:622–640
Huxley J (1957) New bottles for new wine. Chatto & Windus, London
Hyman SE (2011) Cognitive enhancement: promises and perils. Neuron 69:595–598
Jones D (2007) The depths of disgust. Nature (Lond) 447:768–771
Jowett B (1892) The dialogues of Plato: translated into English, with analyses and introductions. Oxford University Press, London
Kadosh RC, Levy N, O’Shea J, Shea N, Savulescu J (2012) The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation. Curr Biol 22:R108–R111
Kass LR (1997) The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. New Repubic 216:17–26
Kraemer F (2010) Authenticity anyone? The enhancement of emotions via neuro-psychopharmacology. Neuroethics 4:51–64
Levy N (2011) Enhancing authenticity. J Appl Philos 28:308–318
McCabe S, Knight J, Teter C, Wechsler H (2005) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction 100:96–106
McKibben B (2003) Enough: staying human in an engineered age. Times Books, New York
Mehlman MJ, Berg JW, Juengst ET, Kodish E (2011) Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20:30–45
Mercier H, Sperber D (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav Brain Sci 34:57–74
Mooney C (2006) The republican war on science. Basic Books, New York
Moreno JD (2011) The body politic. Bellevue Literary Press, New York
Nadler RC, Reiner PB (2010) A call for data to inform discussion on cognitive enhancement. Biosocieties 5:481–482
Nadler RC, Fitz N, Manogaran P, Chong E, Reiner PB (submitted) Public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement
Niemelä J (2010) What puts the “yuck” in the yuck factor? Bioethics 25:267–279
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Blackwell, Oxford
Nussbaum M (2004) Hiding from humanity: disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Outram SM (2012) Ethical considerations in the framing of the cognitive enhancement debate. Neuroethics 2:172–184
Parens E (1998) Is better always good? The enhancement project. Hastings Cent Rep 28:S1–S17
Partridge B, Lucke J, Finnoff J, Hall W (2011) Begging important questions about cognitive enhancement, again. Am J Bioeth 11:14–15
Persson I, Savulescu J (2008) The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. J Appl Philos 25:162–177
President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) Beyond therapy: biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington, DC, p 373
Racine E, Forlini C (2010) Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Neuroethics 3:1–4
Reiner PB (2010) The rise of neuroessentialism. In: Illes J, Sahakian B (eds) Oxford handbook of neuroethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–175
Rifkin J (2002) Fusion biopolitics. Nation-New York 274:7–23
Riis J, Simmons JP, Goodwin GP (2008) Preferences for enhancement pharmaceuticals: the reluctance to enhance fundamental traits. J Consum Res 35:495–508
Rozin P, Millman L, Nemeroff C (1986) Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(4):703–712
Rozin P, Haidt J, Fincher K (2009) Psychology. From oral to moral. Science 323:1179–1180
Sahakian BJ, Morein-Zamir S (2011) Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 25:197–204
Savulescu J (2005) New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance. Reprod Biomed Online 10:36–39
Savulescu J (2006) Justice, fairness, and enhancement. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1093:321–338
Schermer M (2008) Enhancements, easy shortcuts, and the richness of human activities. Bioethics 22:355–363
Schneider S (2009) Mindscan: transcending and enhancing the human brain. In: Schneider S (ed) Science fiction and philosophy: from time travel to superintelligence. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–256
Schulz K (2006) Brave neuro world. The Nation 282:11–16
Singh I, Kelleher KJ (2010) Neuroenhancement in young people: proposal for research, policy, and clinical management. AJOB Neurosci 1:3–16
Stix G (2009) Turbocharging the brain. Sci Am Mag 301:46–55
Sunstein C (2005) Moral heuristics. Behav Brain Sci 28:531–573
Taylor C (1989) Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
White BP, Becker-Blease KA, Grace-Bishop K (2006) Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. J Am Coll Health 54:261–268
Acknowledgement
Supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiner, P.B. (2013). The Biopolitics of Cognitive Enhancement. In: Hildt, E., Franke, A. (eds) Cognitive Enhancement. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6252-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6253-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)