Skip to main content

Tax-optimal step-up and imperfect loss offset

Abstract

In the field of mergers and acquisitions, German and international tax law allow for several opportunities to step up a firm’s assets, i.e., to revaluate the assets at fair market values. When a step-up is performed the taxpayer recognizes a taxable gain, but also obtains tax benefits in the form of higher future depreciation allowances associated with stepping up the tax base of the assets. This tax-planning problem is well known in taxation literature and can also be applied to firm valuation in the presence of taxation. However, the known models usually assume a perfect loss offset. If this assumption is abandoned, the depreciation allowances may lose value as they become tax effective at a later point in time, or even never if there are not enough cash flows to be offset against. This aspect is especially relevant if future cash flows are assumed to be uncertain. This paper shows that a step-up may be disadvantageous or a firm overvalued if these aspects are not integrated into the basic calculus. Compared to the standard approach, assets should be stepped up only in a few cases and — under specific conditions — ata later point in time. Firm values may be considerably lower under imperfect loss offset.

References

  • Brähler, Gernot, Max Göttsche, and Bernhard Rauch (2009): Verlustnutzung von Kapitalgesellschaften bei Umwandlungen- Eine ökonomische Vorteilhaftigkeitsanalyse, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 79 (10): 1175–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapeau-Blondeau, Fran¢ois and Abdelilah Monir (2002): Numerical Evaluation of the Lambert W Function and Application to Generation of Generalized Gaussian Noise With Exponent 1/2, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50 (9): 2160–2165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corless, Robert M., Gaston H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, David J. Jeffrey, and Donald E. Knuth (1996): On the Lambert W Function, Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5 (1): 329–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, Harry and Ronald W. Masulis (1980): Optimal Capital Structure Under Corporate and Personal Taxation, Jounal of Financial Economics, 8 (1): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diller, Markus (2008): Effektive Seuerbelastungen bei unvollständigem Verlustausgleich und unsicheren Erwartungen, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 68 (4): 404–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash K. and Robert S. Pindyck (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Merle (1998): The Effect of Taxes on the Structure of Corporate Acquisitions, Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (2): 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Merle and Shiing-Wu Wang (2000): The Effect of Transaction Structure on Price: Evidence from Subsidiary Sales, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (1): 59–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Merle and Shiing-Wu Wang (2007): Tax Benefits as a Source of Merger Premiums In Acquisitions of Private Corporations, Accounting Review, 82 (2): 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gryglewicz, Sebastian, Kuno J. M. Huisman, and Peter M. Kort (2008): Finite Project Life and Uncertainty Effects on Investment, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32 (7): 2191–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K. (1990): Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions?, Journal of Finance, 45 (5): 1471–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Robert L. and Daniel R. Siegel (1986): The Value of Waiting to Invest, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (4): 707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Heiko and Birk Semmler (2003a): Das Entscheidungsproblem der Wahl des steuerlichen Wertansatzes bei einer Einbringung in eine Kapitalgesellschaft nach § 20 UmwStG, Steuer & Studium, 24 (4): 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Heiko and Birk Semmler (2003b): Steuerbedingter Kaufpreisabschlag bei Anteilen an einer Kapitalgesellschaft, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 73 (6): 583–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Heiko, Dirk Langkau, and Thomas-Patrick Schmidt (2011): Etragsteueroptimale Alternativen zur Umwandlung einer Kapitalgesellschaft in ein Personenunternehmen, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 63 (2): 90–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • PwC (2006): Mergers and Acquisitions: A Global Tax Guide with a Country-by-Country Guide, Wiley & Sons: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, Katherine and Abbie Smith (1991): Effects of Management Buyouts on Corporate Interest and Depreciation Tax Deductions, Journal of Law and Economics, 34 (2): 295–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, Myron S., Mark A. Wolfson, Merle Erickson, Edward L. Maydew, and Terry Shevlin (2009): Taxes and Business Strategy — A Planning Approach, 4th ed., Pearson: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, Ulrich (2008): Besteuerung der Unternehmen, 2th ed., Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trezevant, Robert (1992): Debt Financing and Tax Status: Tests of the Substitution Effect and the Tax Exhaustion Hypothesis Using Firms’ Responses to the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Journal of Finance, 47 (4): 1557–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Diller.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diller, M. Tax-optimal step-up and imperfect loss offset. Bus Res 5, 8–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342729

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342729

JEL classifiation

  • H25
  • M41

Keywords

  • business taxation
  • hidden reserves
  • step-up