The Value of Negotiating Cost-Based Transfer Prices

Abstract

This paper analyzes the potential of one-step transfer prices based on either variable or full costs for coordinating decentralized production and quality-improving investment decisions. Transfer prices based on variable costs fail to induce investments on the upstream stage. In contrast, transfer prices based on full costs provide strong investment incentives for the upstream divisions. However, they fail to coordinate the investment decisions. We show that negotiations prevent such coordination failure. In particular, we find that the firm benefits from a higher degree of decentralization so that total profit increases in the number of parameters being subject to negotiations.

References

  1. Anctil, Regina M. and Sunil Dutta (1999): Negotiated Transfer Pricing and Divisional vs. Firm-Wide Performance Evaluation, The Accounting Review, 74 (1): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldenius, Tim (2000): Intrafirm Trade, Bargaining Power, and Specific Investments, Review of Accounting Studies, 5 (1): 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldenius, Tim, Stefan Reichelstein, and SavitaA. Sahay (1999): Negotiated versus Cost-Based-Transfer Pricing, Review of Accounting Studies, 4 (2): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Che, Yeon-Koo and Donald B. Hausch (1999): Cooperative Investments and the Value of Contracting, The American Economic Review, 89 (1): 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chwolka, Anne and Dirk Simons (2003): Impacts of Revenue Sharing, Profit Sharing and Transfer Pricing on Quality-Improving Investments, European Accounting Review, 12 (1): 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Czechowicz, I. James, Frederick D. S. Choi, and VinodB. Bavishi (1982): Assessing Foreign Subsidiary Performance: Systems & Practices Of Leading Multinational Companies, Business International Corporation: New York (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drury, Colin (2004): Management and Cost Accounting, 6th ed., Thomson Learning: London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eccles, Robert G. (1985): The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice, Lexington Books: Lenham.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edlin, Aaron S. and Stefan Reichelstein (1995): Specific Investment under Negotiated Transfer Pricing: An Efficiency Result, The Accounting Review, 70 (2): 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edlin, Aaron S. and Stefan Reichelstein (1996): Holdups, Standard BreachRemedies, and Optimal Investment, The American Economic Review, 86 (3): 478–501.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst & Young (2001): Transfer Pricing 2001 Global Survey, Ernst & Young International Limited, http://www2.eycom.ch/publications/items/transfpric/en.pdf (Access date: 2003-09-03).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst & Young (2003): Transfer Pricing 2003 Global Survey, EYGM Limited, http://webapp01.ey.com.pl/EYP/WEB/eycom_download.nsf/resources/Transfer%20Pricing%20Survey%20Report_2003.pdf/$FILE/Transfer%20Pricing%20Survey%20Report_2003.pdf (Access date: 2005-06-23).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grabski, Severin V. (1985): Transfer Pricing in Complex Organizations: A Review and Integration of Recent Empirical and Analytical Research, Journal of Accounting Literature, 4: 33–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holmstrom, Bengt and Jean Tirole (1991): Transfer Pricing and Organizational Form, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7 (2): 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horngren, Charles T., Srikant M. Datar, and George Foster (2005): Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, 12th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River (NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, Nicole Bastian (2006): Divisional Performance Measurement and Transfer Pricing for Intangible Assets, Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (2/3): 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lengsfeld, Stephan, Thomas Pfeiffer, and Ulf Schiller (2006): Centralized versus Decentralized Transfer Pricing and Cost-System Choice, Working Paper, SSRN.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Myerson, Roger B. (1981): Utilitarianism, Egalitarianism, and the Timing Effect in Social Choice Problems, Econometrica, 49 (4): 883–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nash, John F. (1950): The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica, 18 (2): 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nash, John F. (1953): Two-Person Cooperative Games, Econometrica, 21 (1): 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. OECD (1999): Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sahay, Savita A. (2003): Transfer Pricing Based on Actual Cost, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15(1): 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simon, Hermann (1989): Price Management, North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tang, Roger Y. W. (1993): Transfer Pricing in the 1990s: Tax and Management Perspectives, Quorum Books: Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wielenberg, Stefan (2000): Negotiated Transfer Pricing, Specific Investment, and Optimal Capacity Choice, Review of Accounting Studies, 5 (3): 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Chwolka.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chwolka, A., Martini, J.T. & Simons, D. The Value of Negotiating Cost-Based Transfer Prices. Bus Res 3, 113–131 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342718

Download citation

Keywords

  • transfer pricing
  • centralized management
  • decentralized management
  • investment
  • product differentiation
  • negotiations