Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Providing Research Opportunities for Medical Students: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Monograph
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research electives are very popular components within the undergraduate medical degree program at University College Cork, with all students required to complete an original translational or clinical research project in their final year. Barriers to the provision of undergraduate research opportunities include costs of laboratory-based and clinical projects, staffing resources, complex and lengthy research governance procedures, and increasing student numbers. In this article, we describe the undergraduate research program at our institution, and outline several initiatives designed to counteract the impact of these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cursiefen C, Beer M, Altunbas A. Should all medical-students do research during their studies?. Med Educ. 1995; 29: 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones M, Singh S, Meakin R. Undergraduate research in primary care: is it sustainable? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2008; 9: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2010 Sep 10 [cited 2012 Dec 12]; 15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2939395/

  5. O’Tuathaigh CMP, Duggan E, Khashan AS, Boylan GB, O’Flynn S. Selection of student selected component [SSCs] modules across the medical undergraduate curriculum: relationship with motivational factors. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 813–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenblatt RA, Desnick L, Corrigan C, Keerbs A. The evolution of a required research program for medical students at the University of Washington School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2006; 81: 877–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement in Basic Medical Education [Internet]. 2011 Sep 13 [cited 2011 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.wfme.org/standards/bme.

  8. General Medical Council. Tomorrows Doctors, outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council, 2009.

  9. British Medical Association. Academic medicine in the NHS: driving innovation and improving healthcare. London: British Medical Association, 2008.

  10. Frishman WH. Student research projects and theses: should they be a requirement for medical school graduation. Heart Dis. 2001; 3: 140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenhalgh T, Wong G. Doing an intercalated BSc can make you a better doctor. Med Educ. 2003; 37: 760–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemph JP, Sodeman W, Claybrook JR, Rand C. A follow-up of a program to foster medical students’ interest in research and academic careers. Acad Med. 1991; 66:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison J. Academic medicine and intercalated BScs. Med Educ. 2004; 38:1128–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sastre EA, Denny JC, McCoy JA, McCoy AB, Spickard A. Teaching evidence-based medicine: Impact on students’ literature use and inpatient clinical documentation. Med Teach. 2011; 33: 306–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heylings DJA, Tariq VN. Reflection and feedback on learning: a strategy for undergraduate research project work. Assess Eval High Educ. 2001; 26: 153–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikkar-Esfahani A, Jamjoom AAB, Fitzgerald JEF. Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Med Teach. 2012; 34:e317–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bortolotti L, Heinrichs B. Delimiting the concept of research: an ethical perspective. Theor Med and Bioeth. 2007; 28: 157–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Edwards SJL. Student projects in medicine: a lesson in science and ethics. Account Res. 2009; 16: 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Riley SC, Gibbs TJ, Ferrell WR, Nelson PR, Smith WC, Murphy MJ. Getting the most out of student selected components: 12 tips for participating students. Med Teach. 2009; 31: 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murdoch-Eaton D, Ellershaw J, Garden A, Newble D, Perry M, Robinson L, et al. Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on purpose. Med Teach. 2004; 26: 33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenhalgh T, Seyan K, Boynton P. “Not a university type”: focus group study of social class, ethnic, and sex differences in school pupils’ perceptions about medical school. BMJ. 2004; 328:1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenhalgh T, Russell J. Promoting the skills of knowledge translation in an online master of science course in primary health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26: 100–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Self DJ, Wolinsky FD, Baldwin DC Jr. The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students’ moral reasoning. Acad Med. 1989; 64: 755–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts LW, Green Hammond KA, Geppert CM, Warner TD. The positive role of professionalism and ethics training in medical education: a comparison of medical student and resident perspectives. Acad Psychiatry. 2004; 28: 170–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Hammond KA. Coexisting commitments to ethics and human research: a preliminary study of the perspectives of 83 medical students. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 5: W1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oakeshott P, Yadava R. Research governance: major barrier to student research. Brit J Gen Prac. 2006; 56: 139–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alcolado J, Bennett R. Research or audit? Ethical approval for medical student clinical projects. Med Educ. 2006; 40: 491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bueno M, Brevidelli MM, Cocarelli T, Santos GM, Ferraz M, Mion D Jr. Reasons for resubmission of research projects to the research ethics committee of a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clin. 2009; 64: 831–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Struthers Jr J, Guild Jr S. Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE Guide No. 69. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 754–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Larson E. The impact of physician-nurse interaction on patient care. Holist Nurs Pract. 1999; 13: 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Eileen Duggan, Kieran Doran, Siún O’Flynn &  Colm M. P. O’Tuathaigh

Authors
  1. Eileen Duggan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kieran Doran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siún O’Flynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Colm M. P. O’Tuathaigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colm M. P. O’Tuathaigh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duggan, E., Doran, K., O’Flynn, S. et al. Providing Research Opportunities for Medical Students: Challenges and Opportunities. Med.Sci.Educ. 23 (Suppl 1), 99–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341814

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341814

Keywords

Search

Navigation