Abstract
Medical student research is recognized as a critical component of undergraduate medical education. Current studies focusing on curricular improvements to promote student research are limited by lack of objective outcome data. At the Mayo Medical School, research has been an integral component of the curriculum since its inception in 1972. In 2006, selectives (periods of time free from competing didactic or clinical responsibilities) were implemented, which permitted students flexibility in their pre-clinical years to pursue service projects, research endeavors, and career exploration. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of this curricular revision on research productivity by Mayo medical students. Publications by Mayo medical students graduating in the 2004–2011 time period were queried in the PubMed database. The number, impact factor, and time to publication for these publications was assembled and analyzed in a cohort of students that graduated before and after selectives were implemented. We found that students who participated in selectives published more papers, papers with a higher impact factor, and published papers earlier in their training than students who graduated prior to the implementation of selectives. We propose that selectives are an effective means to increase research productivity in the Mayo medical school curriculum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bierer SB, Chen HC. How to measure success: the impact of scholarly concentrations on students-a literature review. Acad Med. [Review]. 2010 Mar;85(3):438–52.
Reinders JJ, Kropmans TJ, Cohen-Schotanus J. Extracurricular research experience of medical students and their scientific output after graduation. Med Educ. [Letter]. 2005 Feb;39(2):237.
Chongsiriwatana KM, Phelan ST, Skipper BJ, Rhyne RL, Rayburn WF. Required research by medical students and their choice of a women’s health care residency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2005 May;192(5):1478–80.
Gotterer GS, O’Day D, Miller BM. The Emphasis Program: a scholarly concentrations program at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Acad Med. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2010 Nov;85(11):1717–24.
Parsonnet J, Gruppuso PA, Kanter SL, Boninger M. Required vs. elective research and in-depth scholarship programs in the medical student curriculum. Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):405–8.
Sanford T, Chancer Z, Kiyosaki K. Medical student research at the John A. Burns School of Medicine (JABSOM): the Research Interest Group. Hawaii Med J. 2010 Jul;69(7):172–3.
Schor NF, Troen P, Kanter SL, Levine AS. The Scholarly Project Initiative: introducing scholarship in medicine through a longitudinal, mentored curricular program. Acad Med. 2005 Sep;80(9):824–31.
van Eyk HJ, Hooiveld MH, Van Leeuwen TN, Van der Wurff BL, De Craen AJ, Dekker FW. Scientific output of Dutch medical students. Med Teach. 2010;32(3):231–5.
Zier K, Coplit LD. Introducing INSPIRE, a scholarly component in undergraduate medical education. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Aug;76(4):387–91.
Zier K, Friedman E, Smith L. Supportive programs increase medical students’ research interest and productivity. J Investig Med. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2006 May;54(4):201–7.
Elwood JM, Pearson JC, Madeley RJ, Logan RF, Beaver MW, Gillies PA, et al. Research in epidemiology and community health in the medical curriculum: students’ opinions of the Nottingham experience. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Sep;40(3):232–5.
Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, Adler SR, Nothnagle M, Parsonnet J, et al. Encouraging scholarship: medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):1409–18.
Kramer K. Medical student involvement in research in the pre-clinical years. Hawaii Med J. 2005 Jul;64(7):190–1.
Boninger M, Troen P, Green E, Borkan J, Lance-Jones C, Humphrey A, et al. Implementation of a longitudinal mentored scholarly project: an approach at two medical schools. Acad Med. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2010 Mar;85(3):429–37.
Ogunyemi D, Bazargan M, Norris K, Jones-Quaidoo S, Wolf K, Edelstein R, et al. The development of a mandatory medical thesis in an urban medical school. Teach Learn Med. [Evaluation Studies]. 2005 Fall;17(4):363–9.
Colleges AoAM. Medical School Graduation Questionnaire: 2012 All Schools Summary Report. 2012 July 2012.
Dyrbye LN, Davidson LW, Cook DA. Publications and presentations resulting from required research by students at Mayo Medical School, 1976–2003. Acad Med. 2008 Jun;83(6):604–10.
Porter BL, Grande JP. Mayo Medical School. Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9 Suppl):S300–4.
Colleges AoAM. Medical School Graduation Questionnaire: 2012 Individual School Report Mayo Medical School. 2012 July 2012.
Zwahlen M, Junker C, Egger M. The journal impact factor in the evaluation of research quality: villain, scapegoat or innocent bystander? Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(1):19–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peacock, J.G., Warner, L.L., Drozdowicz, L.B. et al. Curricular Flexibility in the Pre-Clinical Years Promotes Medical Student Scholarship. Med.Sci.Educ. 23 (Suppl 1), 92–98 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341813
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341813