Skip to main content
Log in

A Proposal for Tenure

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assess the current role of tenure in academic health centers in this paper and present the current state of the discussion on the uses, abuses, present role, and short comings of academic tenure as it currently exists. We propose and discuss the proposition that all academics should be tenure eligible and that various pathways to tenure be based on achievements and contributions evaluated by institutional promotions committees. We also comment on the financial implications of universal tenure eligibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clawson D. Infrastructure. Tenure and the future of the university. Science. 2009;324(5931):1147–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson R. Tenure, RIP: What the vanishing status means for the future of education. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2010. http://chronicle.com/article/Tenure-RIP/66114/ Accessed May 07, 2011.

  3. Peterson, MR. Academic tenure and higher education in the United States: implications for the dental education workforce in the twenty-first century. J Dent Educ. 2007;71(3):354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seifert WE Jr, Strobel HW. Faculty and academic institution: a covenantal relationship. Med Sci Educ. 2011;21(1):37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Policy 115 — Faculty Tenure. http://www.uthouston.edu/hoop/policy.htm?id=168777 Accessed June 16, 2011.

  6. Weber State University. Academic Tenure: Definition/Implication/Termination. http://www.weber.edu/ppm/Policies/8-21_AcademicTenure.html Accessed June 16, 2011.

  7. American Association of University Professors. 940 Statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure with 1970 interpretive comments. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/policydocs/contents/i94ostatement.htm Accessed May 07, 2011.

  8. Texas A&M University System. 12.01 Academic Freedom, Responsibility and Tenure. http://policies.tamus.edu/12-01.pdf Accessed June 17, 2011.

  9. Fogg P. Presidents favor scrapping tenure. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005; 52(11):A31. http://chronicle.com/article/Presidents-Favor-Scrapping/23988/ Accessed May 07, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bunton SA. The relationship between tenure and guaranteed salary for U.S. medical school faculty. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 2010; 9(6). https://www.aamc.org/download/125190/data/aibvol9_no6.pdf Accessed May 07, 2011.

  11. Bunton SA, Corrice AM. Trends in tenure for clinical M.D. faculty in U.S. medical schools: a 25-year review. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 2010; 9(9).

  12. AAUP faculty salary survey. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2011. http://chronicle.com/stats/aaup/index.php. Accessed February 14, 2011.

  13. AAMC Faculty Salary Survey Reports. https://services.aamc.org/fssreports/menu.cfm Accessed February 23, 2011. Permission to access these reports must be obtained from the AAMC.

  14. Gardner JW. Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent, too? Revised edition. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Seifert Jr. Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seifert, W.E., Strobel, H.W. A Proposal for Tenure. Med.Sci.Educ. 21, 375–381 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341739

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341739

Keywords

Navigation