Skip to main content
Log in

Aging and intrusion errors in an active visuo-spatial working memory task

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: This study examined whether remembering location information relies on efficient inhibitory functions. Methods: In two experiments, younger and older adults performed an active visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM) span task. Participants were presented with a series of locations and asked to remember only final target locations, which were manipulated according to source (e.g., indicated by the experimenter or participant). Results: Data showed that, as the complexity of the VSWM task increased, older adults made more intrusion errors than younger adults, and that, older adults especially seemed to have difficulty in recalling correct locations when non-final locations were directly manipulated. Conclusions: This study highlights how older adults’ performance in VSWM is influenced by inhibitory working memory functions, which become particularly crucial as attentional demands grow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornoldi C, Vecchi T. Visuospatial Working Memory and Individual Differences. Hove: Psychology Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland DE, Radvansky GA. Aging and integrating spatial mental models. Psychol Aging 2007; 22: 569–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salthouse T. The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology 1994; 8: 535–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maylor E, Vousden JI, Brown GA. Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: data and a model. Psychol Aging 1999; 14: 572–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornoldi C, Bassani C, Berto R, Mammarella N. Aging and the intrusion superiority effect in visuo-spatial working memory. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2007; 14: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vecchi T, Cornoldi C. Passive storage and active manipulation in visuo-spatial working memory: further evidence from the study of age differences. Eur J Cogn Psychol 1999; 11: 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanlierde A, Wanet-Defalque MC. Abilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery. Acta Psychol 2004; 116: 205–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vecchi T, Richardson JTE, Cavallini E. Passive storage versus active processing in working memory: evidence from age-related variations in performance. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2005; 17: 521–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasher L, Zacks RT. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 22: 193–225. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasher L, Zacks RT, May CP. Inhibitory control, circadian arousal and age. In Gopher D, ed. Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palladino P, De Beni R. Short term and working memory in aging: maintenance and suppression. Aging Clin Exp Res 1999; 11: 301–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 220–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Beni R, Palladino P, Pazzaglia F, Cornoldi C. Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. Q J Exp Psychol: A 1998; 51: 305–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Passolunghi MC, Cornoldi C, De Liberto S. Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Mem Cogn 1999; 27: 779–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daneman M, Carpenter PA. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 1980; 19: 450–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson MK, Raye L. Reality monitoring. Psychol Rev 1981; 88: 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 3–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Henkel LA, Johnson MK, De Leonardis DM. Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. J Exp Psychol Gen 1998; 127: 251–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell KJ, Johnson MK, Raye CL, Mather M, D’Esposito M. Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits. Psychol Aging 2000; 15: 527–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Glisky EL, Rubin SR, Davidson PSR. Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2001; 27: 1131–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oberauer K. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. J Exp Psychol Gen 2005; 134: 368–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wechsler D, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised manual. New York: Psychology Corporation, 1987.

  23. Della Sala S, Gray C, Baddeley A, Allamano N, Wilson L. Pattern span: a tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 1189–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spinnler H, Tognoni G. Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 1987; 8: 1–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cornoldi C, Mammarella N. Intrusion errors in visuo-spatial working memory performance. Memory 2006; 14: 176–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lehman EB, Mellinger JC. Effects of aging on memory for presentation modality. Dev Psychol 1984; 20: 1210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goolkasian P, Foos PW. Presentation format and its effect on working memory. Mem Cogn 2002; 30: 1096–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mammarella N, Fairfield B, Cornoldi C. Reality monitoring and resistance to forgetting under short retention interval. Q J Exp Psychol 2007; 60: 551–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zacks RT, Hasher L, Li K. Human Memory. In Craik F, Salthouse T, eds. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. London: LEA, 2000; 293–357.

  30. Kausler DH. Learning and Memory in Normal Aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chialfonte B, Johnson MK. Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Mem Cogn 1996; 24: 403–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baddeley AD. Is working memory still working? Eur Psychol 2002; 7: 85–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Mammarella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mammarella, N., Fairfield, B., De Beni, R. et al. Aging and intrusion errors in an active visuo-spatial working memory task. Aging Clin Exp Res 21, 282–291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324917

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324917

Keywords

Navigation